Resource Copyright and BF- new rules

[Gasometer]

Referring to the sticky above, this means whole articles snipped from online papers/magazines behind pay walls?

What about photos? Eg the Duursma Mark?

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Referring to the sticky above, this means whole articles snipped from online papers/magazines behind pay walls?

What about photos? Eg the Duursma Mark?

As far as we know it is articles in their entirety. A relevant snippet and a photo no dramas, as long as they have the article link in the post to drive traffic to the source.

We had similar concerns over the last year with full articles from The Mongrel Punt being posted and those authors were justifiably miffed their work behind a paywall was being exposed (they were always quite kind and patient when touching base with the mods).

 

[shintemaster]

Fair enough IMO, but I still won't be paying money for the dross that gets printed nowadays.

 

[Gasometer]

As far as we know it is articles in their entirety. A relevant snippet and a photo no dramas, as long as they have the article link in the post to drive traffic to the source.

We had similar concerns over the last year with full articles from The Mongrel Punt being posted and those authors were justifiably miffed their work behind a paywall was being exposed (they were always quite kind and patient when touching base with the mods).

Paywall…posting..whole pages?

Schultz defence

 

[czero]

I assume if we are DMd said news then its all good?

Asking for a friend.

 

[koshari]

Ppppffft, just plagerise it. Most of its plagerised anyway already.

I mean 100 monkeys and typewriters and all that stuff.

 

[gokangas]

Tell 'em they're dreamin'.

 

[DuckYeah]

Anything for public interest should be free of any copyright breaches. Sport is public interest and should be freely available to every Australian!

 

[kool kangas]

As far as we know it is articles in their entirety. A relevant snippet and a photo no dramas, as long as they have the article link in the post to drive traffic to the source.

We had similar concerns over the last year with full articles from The Mongrel Punt being posted and those authors were justifiably miffed their work behind a paywall was being exposed (they were always quite kind and patient when touching base with the mods).

So they actually read Big Footy ....

 

[Gasometer]

So they actually read Big Footy ....

Damo is on this Board

 

[Shermanator]

Bigfooty members release multiple footy angles online for everyone to read for free.

‘Journos’ concoct story by using Bigfooty members info and then hide it behind a paywall.

Bigfooty members must now pay ‘Journos’ to read their original footy angles..

Sounds fair..

 

[Colby Cheer Squad]

According to the admin Wosh ...

"Fair dealing in many jurisdictions allows for a small amount of a work to be reproduced for a number of purposes, including parody/satire and criticism or review."

So it's okay to post John Ralph content as long as you take the piss out of him immediately after?