Corona virus, Port and the AFL.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
So what are we being swamped by in SA? I'm genuinely interested what's smashing our hospitals.

I already told you what I know. I know that’s not very satisfying. I concur.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

There's a lot wrong with that graph lol I wonder if he borrowed the program from Michael Mann?

If you want to read in depth about the author's method and process, read the Reddit thread.

 
Because you would have seen that Forzaport wasn't labelled as you suggested and a respectful discussion was had that enlightened and informed anyone who read it.

You seem to be one of those that's put your flag in the contrarian camp and attack anyone that challenges you.

Why is that?

It was a joke because he dared suggest that Covid-19 data was skewed on two counts. I'm sorry if that didn't come through. People seem to take very seriously any 'contrarian' posts I make.

I'm flattered that you have made an analysis of my posting style. How was it contrarian? Because I asked the question could Covid-19 statistics might be skewed because comorbidity data has not been factored into most hospitalisation and morbidity rates? They may not make a huge difference but it does make a difference. I've posted that most future projections are based on the assumption that we will treat the virus with no greater efficacy than we have in the first 3 months that we learned of its existence. I bash Trump for being an ineffectual leader in a time of crisis, who has possibly done more with his cronies to damage efforts to fight the virus than to help. You really call those contrarian???

I don't attack anyone that challenges me. I attack those who attack and ridicule those who may have a different, valid but non populist view to make and are brave enough to express it. Those who misrepresent and misquote those same people labelling them with views they never had. Because it shits me. However I'd like to think in most cases what I post is moderate, respectful and generally backed up by some sort of source or fact. If I don't jump on a particular posting bandwagon because I don't agree, tough. I hope that answers your question to the extent that I feel the need to explain my posting style to anyone.
 
If I were the ALP (and hence the ABC) I'd be ensuring that this thing finishes up costing the government so much money that I couldn't lose the next election.

Remind me who it is that funds the ABC? Is it the ALP, the party that's been in opposition for the past 7 years, or is it the party that's been in power for those past 7 years?
 
There's a lot wrong with that graph lol I wonder if he borr.....
"Some COVID deaths are probably going to be included in this season’s flu numbers, and some deaths that would have been attributed to the flu in most years are going to be attributed to COVID. Such is the nature of our mortality statistics."


^ like seriously we need to know how many deaths are being attributed to covid that wouldn't necessarily be otherwise across the board.
 
I hope it's all returned negative.

How does it work? You give them your mobile and wait for a sms?
Gotta sign up to sms results separately otherwise I guess hospital or GP ring you.

I'm sure I'm fine, I was just advised to take one as a precaution as I have a cold and could be displaying minor symptoms and spread to my partner who is on immunosuppressants.

Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk
 
I think they need to split out out the stats when they can of From and With.

So we know now the US has confirmed anyone who dies of anything but has even a sniff of Corona is now a victim but it would be helpful to split out the died from and died with. There's been other US commentators now noticing a drop in other deaths which would be because of this coding change. I don't mind it if it's to make sure they capture all COVID data so they can analyse afterwards common preconditions etc but just make the data clear, available publicly and explain it. Whether it's here and there and everywhere for the public.

(ignore the twitter account its' from ffs just watch the video. And for all the just the flu crowd\TDS sufferers no I don't even have a twitter account so I'm in no way subscribed or endorsing the journo, it's just the first clip I found with the bit I wanted)

 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If you want to read in depth about the author's method and process, read the Reddit thread.



I did, he states something we did on here last night and got labelled as 'just the flu' people, how ironic.

"I’d also be wary of treating the COVID numbers as more accurate—as others have pointed out, the nature of the virus means lots of people are getting it who would have died anyway and our lack of testing means that deaths that might have been attributed to flu-associated pneumonia in a normal year will be attributed to COVID.

I think what we’re all finding is that our mortality data is surprisingly messy when you scratch at it at all, so it’s not as simple as we’ve become accustomed to with causality counts from accidents, disasters and combat."
 
It will be harder for a Labor government to attack these initiatives than vice versa. A taxing the rich/business in a climate of double digit unemployment whilst also cutting services is not something Labor can run with. Labor will find it hugely difficult to win the next election. Libs will win the next election, then embark on a large cost cutting of all the essential services and privatise whatever we've got left to privatise. They'll go too far in many people's eyes and then Labor will win the election after that.

Freydenberg has already said the Coalition will not be touching the GST so there are not many other ways they can recover 320 billion and you have hit two of them on the head. They will slash services and selloff assets.
 
I think they need to split out out the stats when they can of From and With.

So we know now the US has confirmed anyone who dies of anything but has even a sniff of Corona is now a victim but it would be helpful to split out the died from and died with. There's been other US commentators now noticing a drop in other deaths which would be because of this coding change. I don't mind it if it's to make sure they capture all COVID data so they can analyse afterwards common preconditions etc but just make the data clear, available publicly and explain it. Whether it's here and there and everywhere for the public.

(ignore the twitter account its' from ffs just watch the video. And for all the just the flu crowd\TDS sufferers no I don't even have a twitter account so I'm in no way subscribed or endorsing the journo, it's just the first clip I found with the bit I wanted)



Get corona -> die

Couldn't have possibly been the corona!
 
So we know now the US has confirmed anyone who dies of anything but has even a sniff of Corona is now a victim but it would be helpful to split out the died from and died with.

Hang on, this is a revelation to you? That a full coronial investigation hasn't gone into every single death to determine what percentage of responsibility is Covid's and what percentage is something else?

I think most of us were kind of taking that for granted.
 
He mentioned Michael Mann so I'm guessing he's a climate denier as well, so you won't get far with this one

You realise the guy making the bad graph has said the same thing you called us "JUST THE FLU" for yesterday?

Also, it was apt as the graph resembled quite accurately one of the biggest scientific frauds of the last century, I just figured maybe he'd borrowed his algorithm. You can be a climate believer/denier/agnostic but you're a complete moron if you still believe that graph and scientist has any place in the conversation anymore. In a non politicised scientific field he'd have nuked his own career for good with that and anyone associated with it.
 
Hang on, this is a revelation to you? That a full coronial investigation hasn't gone into every single death to determine what percentage of responsibility is Covid's and what percentage is something else?

I think most of us were kind of taking that for granted.

*face palm* just go back and read the last 15 pages if you need help working it out.
 
You realise the guy making the bad graph has said the same thing you called us "JUST THE FLU" for yesterday?

Also, it was apt as the graph resembled quite accurately one of the biggest scientific frauds of the last century, I just figured maybe he'd borrowed his algorithm. You can be a climate believer/denier/agnostic but you're a complete moron if you still believe that graph and scientist has any place in the conversation anymore. In a non politicised scientific field he'd have nuked his own career for good with that and anyone associated with it.

Clearly hyperbole and it's quite pathetic that contrarian/denier/tinfoil crowd singles out this graph as if it's some kind of smoking gun, ignoring the thousands of others published papers and global consensus.

The key conclusion that the planet is warmer now than it has been on the past 1000 years has been proven 100% correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top