- Apr 29, 2016
- 13,723
- 12,022
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
he really didn't though. It's just that no-one expects anything from Hickey. If Hickey had Gawn's numbers people would be saying the same thing.Gawn just got chopped by Hickey
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
he really didn't though. It's just that no-one expects anything from Hickey. If Hickey had Gawn's numbers people would be saying the same thing.Gawn just got chopped by Hickey
One game doesn't matter when comparing careers, but Hickey being good/better than Gawn definitely helped make the difference on the weekend.he really didn't though. It's just that no-one expects anything from Hickey. If Hickey had Gawn's numbers people would be saying the same thing.
So at what stage do the player ratings factor in all of the game time that Gawn was deep forward and Jackson was rucking?One game doesn't matter when comparing careers, but Hickey being good/better than Gawn definitely helped make the difference on the weekend.
Well if he’s kicking goals and otherwise doing stuff I’m sure the ratings would give him points, if he’s standing around doing bugger all up there, well not so much!So at what stage do the player ratings factor in all of the game time that Gawn was deep forward and Jackson was rucking?
Of course. You're saying Hickey beat Gawn. Yet you're using player ratings which mark Gawn down signicantly for time when hickey and Gawn weren't even playing on each other. If anything, your stats show that Gawn likely outperformed Hickey when rucking against each other due to his time spent forward and Jackson rucking.Well if he’s kicking goals and otherwise doing stuff I’m sure the ratings would give him points, if he’s standing around doing bugger all up there, well not so much!
The whole point of the ratings is their impact over the entire game. Are you suggesting he shouldn’t be rated for when he is up forward?
One's ranked two out of 44 and the other 5. Meaningless.One game doesn't matter when comparing careers, but Hickey being good/better than Gawn definitely helped make the difference on the weekend.
I don’t know, the Cox is better than Gawn because Tom Hickey was a pretty compelling argument.One's ranked two out of 44 and the other 5. Meaningless.
Especially when May is ranked 8 when most consider him best on ground after one of the great finals games by a key defender.
The coaches awarded 6 players votes in the Gary Ayres Medal, yet they awarded none to Gawn or Hickey. I'm far more interested in the eye test than ''ratings points''.
Don’t know what part of this you can disagree with…One game doesn't matter when comparing careers, but Hickey being good/better than Gawn definitely helped make the difference on the weekend.
You can discuss whatever you like.Are we allowed to talk about Gawns performances in finals yet? The 5 goal prelim looking like the massive exception to what he’s been putting up otherwise
Cool raw stats. How about 7 effective disposals against Darcy Fort of all people.You can discuss whatever you like.
Gawn wasn't the reason we lost last night.
15 disposals, 2 contested marks, 3 tackles, 5 clearances, 36 hitouts would be in line with his career averages (or better).
Do you want to talk about his and Cox's career records when it comes to coaches and Brownlow votes ?
He didn't have a great game, but it was far from a shocker.Cool raw stats. How about 7 effective disposals against Darcy Fort of all people.
Disappeared in the second half when the lions made their move. Fort had more second half touches.
Need more from your best players
Because Dean Cox only ever played excellent games…He didn't have a great game, but it was far from a shocker.
When the heat was on, i.e. early in a final, he led the way.
We know he has groin issues, which may have limited him later in the match, but c'est la vie.
Back to the coaches and Brownlow votes ? Or their respective contested marking history ?
Dean Cox’s corkies were much better than Max Gawn’s corkies.Gawn was s**t but he also had a corky and couldn't move.
Its a stupid comparison, because West Coast fans naturally don't remember any bad games Cox had given he retired long ago.
You’ve already showed horrific judgement on Oliver vs. Berry.cox accolades collected amongst a field of stronger contemporaries than gawn
cox for me
i see melbourne fans take after their players by attacking the man rather than the game. very sad and insecure lot.You’ve already showed horrific judgement on Oliver vs. Berry.
Congratulations on winding back to simply poor judgement. It’s a step forward for you
Attacking your poor judgement. Yes, you earned it.i see melbourne fans take after their players by attacking the man rather than the game. very sad and insecure lot.
you seem tired and emotional. ill ignore you until youre over your straight sets exitAttacking your poor judgement. Yes, you earned it.
You ignoring me? I win.you seem tired and emotional. ill ignore you until youre over your straight sets exit