Cricket Discussion - Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

The top bowling Strike Rates for bowlers who have taken 20 or more wickets in Australia. Here is a cut and paste of the top 30 ever.

1st Boland
4th Bumrah
9th Cummins
20th Starc.

No wonder its been a bowler's series. Some of the best ever are playing. Hazlewood is 36th with 168 wickets and strike rate of 52.00. Lyon is 102nd, 64.5 with 268 wickets - he hasn't really been needed this series. He's on par with Clarrie Grimmett who is 104th, 64.7 with 105 wickets.

Hard to believe Funky Miller is a tad behind Dennis Lillee, yes wickets taken are 202 less by Funky. Surprised Malcolm Marshall is 51st with 54.3 and Joel Garner 64th with 56.9, I thought they would be top 30 type figures but under 60 balls per wicket is still very good.

Siraj is 52nd just behind Marshall with 29 wickets and a 54.5 strike rate.



1735876214543.png
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Cricket is the ultimate leveller - Reddy goes from heroic century maker in Melbourne to golden duck today.
Best example that I can think of that, in 1 game let alone next test, is this one by Viv Richards in the test that Hilditch - 100+ and Border batted well for almost all day of 5 at the MCG, and Oz hung on to draw, were 8 down in the end, after Oz were belted in the first 3 tests by the West Indies.

It was Border's first test as captain, a gritty draw was the first of many to come under his leadership, and Craig McDermott made his debut as a 19 year old. Viv made his 200 off just over 200 balls in the first innings, then McDermott got him LBW 2nd ball in the second innings.



139
West Indies​
208
0
Australia​
 
Last edited:
History repeats as this time Washington Sundar goes caught off the glove after a DRS referral. Up yours cricindians if our boy Alex Carey thinks it is out it is out.
IMHO not even remotely comparable to the Jaiswal dismissal at the MCG. In that dismissal there was a clear and strong deviation in the trjectory of the ball as it passed his bat/glove. And everyone went up in unison.

This time the deviation was minuscule if at all and the snicko was noisy and far from conclusive. Only Carey expressed any interest. Cummins was lukewarm. The case to overturn the decision wasn't there.

We'd be rightly pissed off it was a decision that led to one of our batters departing.
 
Konstas is really under their skins though.
True. But who benefits?

Konstas fired up Bumrah with only two balls remaining before stumps. The one bowler who has our measure. And we lost a wicket on stumps. And united the Indian team.

Not a smart move from Konstas in my view. His immaturity showing. Hopefully he learns to temper his chirping just a tad.
 
Last edited:
True. But who benefits?

Konstas fired up Bumrah with only two balls remaining before stumps. The one bowler who has our measure. And we lost a wicket on stumps. And united the Indian team.

Not a smart move from Konstas in my view. His immaturity showing. Hopefully he learns to temper his chirping just a tad.

I don't know you can blame Konstas for Khawaja's abysmal lack of footwork. There was nothing special about the delivery, the ball before had more than the usual "hyperextension".

I'm glad Konstas is getting in their faces, they are completely distracted by him. And really all he did was explain why Khawaja was wasting time ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top