FromTheBoundaryLine
Club Legend
- Jun 7, 2022
- 1,234
- 2,901
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Didn’t want to hijack other threads so putting up a separate one.
Watching the VFL the other day I was really finding it difficult to gauge player performance or development with seemingly 3 levels of talent in the one team: Senior AFL players who’ve been dropped or coming back from injury, drafted players, club level players.
It honestly made me wonder if we should leave the VFL, for example, to the best juniors (U/19) who go into the draft 19yo - 20yo.
Bring back the AFL “reserves/seconds” for draftees, senior AFL players not in the firsts, mature age recruits, mature age mid season draftees, SSP nominees etc.
We’ve got so many categories of recruits at present that having a dedicated “reserves team” outside the VFL may actually simplify the pathway approach.
I reckon the AFL and clubs could could afford it, if not then subsidies could be directed here rather than the draft. Given the absurd amounts of money being suggested for players recently and length of contracts being offered it may also ensure a fairly even spread of resources rather than being concentrated at the upper end. Also, having players drafted 19yo -20yo would perhaps be better for their development and an opportunity for them to get employment and life experience prior to drafting which may set them up to succeed in footy and outside of footy.
I’m thinking out loud with all of the above and realise it’s unlikely to happen but interested in other’s thoughts on the current systems in place which to me become more and more confusing each year.
Watching the VFL the other day I was really finding it difficult to gauge player performance or development with seemingly 3 levels of talent in the one team: Senior AFL players who’ve been dropped or coming back from injury, drafted players, club level players.
It honestly made me wonder if we should leave the VFL, for example, to the best juniors (U/19) who go into the draft 19yo - 20yo.
Bring back the AFL “reserves/seconds” for draftees, senior AFL players not in the firsts, mature age recruits, mature age mid season draftees, SSP nominees etc.
We’ve got so many categories of recruits at present that having a dedicated “reserves team” outside the VFL may actually simplify the pathway approach.
I reckon the AFL and clubs could could afford it, if not then subsidies could be directed here rather than the draft. Given the absurd amounts of money being suggested for players recently and length of contracts being offered it may also ensure a fairly even spread of resources rather than being concentrated at the upper end. Also, having players drafted 19yo -20yo would perhaps be better for their development and an opportunity for them to get employment and life experience prior to drafting which may set them up to succeed in footy and outside of footy.
I’m thinking out loud with all of the above and realise it’s unlikely to happen but interested in other’s thoughts on the current systems in place which to me become more and more confusing each year.