- Banned
- #251
What happened with Masala & MTL?
When I initially checked the scores it looked like 103-102 victory to Masala. Now a draw.
When I initially checked the scores it looked like 103-102 victory to Masala. Now a draw.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I saw a draw at first. Then checked later and it was a one point win. So perhaps a live score error?What happened with Masala & MTL?
When I initially checked the scores it looked like 103-102 victory to Masala. Now a draw.
I saw a draw at first. Then checked later and it was a one point win. So perhaps a live score error?
Dont count on itScoreboard and goal umpires had masala winning by a point at full time, time keepers had t as a draw. I believe the result is going to be decided by the league but would of thought goal umpires scorecards would win out if there was no discrepancy
I would have thought two goal umpires agreeing would outweigh timekeepers? Seems logical doesn't it?Scoreboard and goal umpires had masala winning by a point at full time, time keepers had t as a draw. I believe the result is going to be decided by the league but would of thought goal umpires scorecards would win out if there was no discrepancy
I would have thought two goal umpires agreeing would outweigh timekeepers? Seems logical doesn't it?
Yes. Both Goal Umpires scorecards agreed on a 1 point win to Masala, both Timekeepers scorecards agreed on a draw. The 1 point discrepancy was identified at 3/4 time. Scoreboard and Live Score reflected the Goal Umpires scorecards. Officiating Field Umpires said that the Timekeepers scorecards take precedence - but they have referred the matter to VAFA for review.That's what I would of thought. I wasn't there so can't 100% confirm this but from what Ive heard goal umpires both agreed masala was up by a point at the end
Some Clubs dropping down to Clubbies are put in Club XVIII (1) whilst others are put in Club XVIII (2). Would love to know how the decision is made.I've no issue with the club's, I just think that any "Senior" side dropping down for whatever reason would most likely better suited to Club XVIII (1) rather than (2). All for club's doing what they need to do to regroup and get going again. It's an administrative thing from HQ.
Yeah fair enough.
Bizzare..So beautifully put.
Was the game videoed by either side? Fast forwarding through the third quarter and recording scores as they happened should show any error.
Yes. Both Goal Umpires scorecards agreed on a 1 point win to Masala, both Timekeepers scorecards agreed on a draw. The 1 point discrepancy was identified at 3/4 time. Scoreboard and Live Score reflected the Goal Umpires scorecards. Officiating Field Umpires said that the Timekeepers scorecards take precedence - but they have referred the matter to VAFA for review.
I think the answer is today.When in the year would teams not be able to accept new players? I'm moving back to Melbourne next week and wouldn't mind having a run around.
Yep, the draw stands.What was the outcome? Still a draw?