- Jul 5, 2013
- 7,843
- 15,141
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Is Sid Draper the best available at pick 2 or is it the SA factor?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I'll put it this way, his ceiling isn't as high as Smith, FOS, Langford but he's more consistent with his output than them imo. I think pick 2 is high for him personally.Is Sid Draper the best available at pick 2 or is it the SA factor?
i would be taking smiley langford and lalor ahead of draperI'll put it this way, his ceiling isn't as high as Smith, FOS, Langford but he's more consistent with his output than them imo. I think pick 2 is high for him personally.
We can dream. I agree though.We ain’t getting pick 2, stop debating who we would pick with it lol
If it's North's (or anyone's) F1 we should make them wait to 2026 for the trade. If they want him now we should ask for picks in the current draft.If it’s Norths F1, they could rise next year, why not take Saints this year if they’re offering?
I don’t want to wait until next year!
For us but I doubt they do that. Not sure they would even do 14 and F1.What about if North split pick 2 into say pick 9 and 14. They keep pick 14 and give us pick 9, along with their future first pick next year. That would work.
So why would we trade him for anything less than that?For us but I doubt they do that. Not sure they would even do 14 and F1.
So why would we trade him for anything less than that?
You've got a guy who will play very high level football and transform the way his new club moves the ball from HB and enters 50, for the next 6 years (minimum). Are we supposed to take our chances that pick 14 might be an equivalent player in due course?
Why should we accept that? There's no pressure on us at all here to buckle.
First feasible and fair trade exchange I can recall seeing.North's future first seems perfect for a three way with GC who want to get more into next years draft and have R1 picks to burn this year.
North: F1 for Houston
GC: Luko,12 for NM F1
Port: Houston for Luko, 12
Some pick swaps or later picks to balance things out but that's a pretty good guts of a deal.
? But in your earlier post you said you wanted P9 along with the F1? And then a F1 now is fair?First feasible and fair trade exchange I can recall seeing.
I think pick 2 would also get you a third pick in te 20sWhat about if North split pick 2 into say pick 9 and 14. They keep pick 14 and give us pick 9, along with their future first pick next year. That would work.
I stated in another thread that we should turn Houston into a top 12 pick and Lukosius.? But in your earlier post you said you wanted P9 along with the F1? And then a F1 now is fair?
Either way I don’t disagree with you that I’d like more than a F1 from NM, I am just not sure we will get that.
Is Sid Draper the best available at pick 2 or is it the SA factor?
What about if North split pick 2 into say pick 9 and 14. They keep pick 14 and give us pick 9, along with their future first pick next year. That would work.
We are Port BuckleaideSo why would we trade him for anything less than that?
You've got a guy who will play very high level football and transform the way his new club moves the ball from HB and enters 50, for the next 6 years (minimum). Are we supposed to take our chances that pick 14 might be an equivalent player in due course?
Why should we accept that? There's no pressure on us at all here to buckle.
Our F1 is a top 4 pick.
We could triple our wins and still get pick 4.
We’ll have to give back something with Soldo then, unless GC really value the salary dump.Luko should be tied into the Soldo deal, not the Houston deal