Schulzenfest
TheBrownDog
Lukosius salary dump. We take on the full salary and get pick 13 as well, just like Geelong when they traded Bowes.
Yep.
Delusional.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Lukosius salary dump. We take on the full salary and get pick 13 as well, just like Geelong when they traded Bowes.
Yep.
AFLPA would never agree to thatEveryone says this. But if we did abolish compensation, you can say goodbye to any notion of equalisation.
The only solution is to scrap free agency entirely. Which imo is the right thing. It doesn’t suit our game.
Everyone says this. But if we did abolish compensation, you can say goodbye to any notion of equalisation.
The only solution is to scrap free agency entirely. Which imo is the right thing. It doesn’t suit our game.
It was an enormous, disastrous mistake to institute a Free Agency without the accompanying trading without consent. FA works in American sport because it's balanced by teams being able to trade contracted players without the player's consent.
It's wildly unbalanced in the AFL and they can never fix it without having to make some huge concessions to the AFLPA.
Yeah I’ve said this before. It was adopted from an American system where players come into the league already developed by insanely professional high school and college systems.
Teams that lose players coming into their prime didn’t spend years waiting for the player to physically develop or to learn to play the game.
It’s just incredibly stupid here.
Do You think North can convince Houston to go thereNorth looking to split pick 2
Do You think North can convince Houston to go there
I think if Port tell him that they'll accept North's deal tomorrow but they won't accept Blues or Pies' deal of only 1 mid first rounder then it'll be very interesting to see what he does.900k a year. Leadership role. Playing finals in a couple of years?
If I were in his position I wouldn't mind it if it was Ports preferred deal.
I don't believe Carlton or Collingwood can get a deal done.
To be honest, if North have the best trade deal in front of us we shouldn’t be giving Houston a choice.900k a year. Leadership role. Playing finals in a couple of years?
If I were in his position I wouldn't mind it if it was Ports preferred deal.
I don't believe Carlton or Collingwood can get a deal done.
Noble and Rioli are only "worth" that because Gold Coast don't need those picks. Those prices wouldn't be entertained at other clubs. Dan is worth Pick 2 though.So let me get this straight.
Dan Rioli is worth pick 6
Josh Battle is worth pick 8
John Noble is worth pick 13.
On that basis/weighting, Dan Houston is worth pick 2. Nothing else should be entertained.
I’ve got a gut feeling that we’ll settle for a first rounder in the early teens and f2.900k a year. Leadership role. Playing finals in a couple of years?
If I were in his position I wouldn't mind it if it was Ports preferred deal.
I don't believe Carlton or Collingwood can get a deal done.
To be honest, if North have the best trade deal in front of us we shouldn’t be giving Houston a choice.
He wants to be back in Victoria, tell him we will trade him to which ever Victorian club offers us the best deal.
Do you think this is part of the reason he wants to go. Could this be the real issue here.Tell Dan if it's not Roos or Tigers we will rewrite his contract to 800 a yr like we were going to offer Perryman
Pick 2 is absolutely more than enough for Dan. Probably overs to be honest.Just tell Norf if they want Dan we want Pick 2 and change
Yep. I would grab pick 2, and give them something back as well.Pick 2 is absolutely more than enough for Dan. Probably overs to be honest.
Pick 2 for a soon to be 28yr old in May next year is massive.Have I missed something here? We've gone from 2 top 10 picks, to 2 first rounders, to one first rounder and a good second, to pick 2 being overs?
Are we being buttered up to take another rogering?
AA in the last two seasons, 3 years left on contract, will easily be in any clubs top few. If Rioli and Smith are inside the top 10, then two first rounders for Dan isn't unreasonable.
Have I missed something here? We've gone from 2 top 10 picks, to 2 first rounders, to one first rounder and a good second, to pick 2 being overs?
Are we being buttered up to take another rogering?
AA in the last two seasons, 3 years left on contract, will easily be in any clubs top few. If Rioli and Smith are inside the top 10, then two first rounders for Dan isn't unreasonable.