- Jun 20, 2011
- 2,704
- 2,713
- AFL Club
- Gold Coast
Dr Shuey's beef with Andrews
Independent experts are meant to impartial. If the author has a vested interest in the matter that should disqualify his report.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Dr Shuey's beef with Andrews
You would be very nieve to think it doesn't happen here.This isn't the USA! The author of the report was a decorated retired former Assistant Commissioner for Traffic and Operations with VicPol who received an AO. You don't get AO's if you are undeserving do you? Oh wait...
An AO for a retired senior public servant is the modern equivalent of a gold watch.This isn't the USA! The author of the report was a decorated retired former Assistant Commissioner for Traffic and Operations with VicPol who received an AO. You don't get AO's if you are undeserving do you? Oh wait...
Dr Shuey's beef with Andrews was that he used VicPol to not just avoid police scrutiny over the accident but to shift blame. Andrews' then chief of staff was all over it like a rash, and in 2019 Dan rewarded the former policeman by appointing him as an assistant commissioner of VicPol, a move described at the time by The Age because it made a mockery of a fundamental principle being that the association between police and government should never be politicised
Sarcasm meter run out of battery?An AO for a retired senior public servant is the modern equivalent of a gold watch.
Sarcasm meter run out of battery?
Perhaps. Why am I surprised you defend Andrews like he is a saint? There are simply way too many discrepancies in this case for it not to warrant further investigation. For example:You would be very nieve to think it doesn't happen here.
You're going to go with the expert that best supports your case.
I'm not defending him at all. I'm pointing out that in legal cases it's common to get experts to back up your narrative and make the other side look bad. You'll find the other side will do similar. In the end both sides will cross examine and the truth will come out in the wash.Perhaps. Why am I surprised you defend Andrews like he is a saint?
It's been investigated. How much more do you want? A Royal Commission?There are simply way too many discrepancies in this case for it not to warrant further investigation. For example:
If only, but it won't and never will. I know that. I genuinely hope the kid (who is now an adult) get's his just desserts, but sadly, I suspect the 'Machine' will work against him.You like so many who hate him are hoping this is the smoking gun that will finally punish him.
I suspect you would believe anything negative about Andrews because you hope it will be thing that punishes him.
You only ever use an independent experts report that supports your case. If you consult an expert that doesn't support your case, you don't submit their opinion as evidence. If you have enough money, you just keep asking until you get one that gives you what you want, and if you have all the money, you engage every single expert as to ensure they are conflicted from being called by the other side. It is simply how the game is played.I'm not defending him at all. I'm pointing out that in legal cases it's common to get experts to back up your narrative and make the other side look bad. You'll find the other side will do similar. In the end both sides will cross examine and the truth will come out in the wash.
You can just look at the location and know that a kid riding a bike along that path has no chance of being seen by a car turning that corner. It's basic common sense. You don't need to invent or spread conspiracy theories. They were in opposition at the time of all of this too. It's not like he could strong-arm the police minister.If only, but it won't and never will. I know that. I genuinely hope the kid (who is now an adult) get's his just desserts, but sadly, I suspect the 'Machine' will work against him.
Answer me this question - why do you think it is that Andrews is/was such a divisive figure? Moreso than Morrison, or any other politician that I can remember. Maybe its because he has NEVER faced the music for any of his alleged wrongdoings, starting with the Hotel Quarantine Security debacle.
the same way footballers and tv actors etc got away with stuff back then.You can just look at the location and know that a kid riding a bike along that path has no chance of being seen by a car turning that corner. It's basic common sense. You don't need to invent or spread conspiracy theories. They were in opposition at the time of all of this too. It's not like he could strong-arm the police minister.
None of the conspiracy makes any sense compared to the official story.
Easy he's a Labor politician who made unpopular decisions in covid.Answer me this question - why do you think it is that Andrews is/was such a divisive figure? Moreso than Morrison, or any other politician that I can remember. Maybe its because he has NEVER faced the music for any of his alleged wrongdoings, starting with the Hotel Quarantine Security debacle.
I'd say it's the magnitude of the stuff-upsHow come other states had thier own stuff ups in covid those leaders don't cop the same treatment? None of them have "faced the music" either
Easy he's a Labor politician who made unpopular decisions in covid.
Throw in a very bias media who got increasingly desperate to nail him.
How come other states had thier own stuff ups in covid those leaders don't cop the same treatment? None of them have "faced the music" either
Gladys mucked up. She's no longer Premier and the party she led is now in opposition.
Not sure what other state "had their own stuff up" to the extent of the preventable and unique hotel quarantine outbreak in 2020 in Victoria.
Expedience. The states run the hospitals and health services. The Feds just provide funding. Nobody had any concept just how big this was going to be in Australia, as we had not experienced anything like it in over 100 years, despite many pandemic like outbreaks across the world.Why did the LNP under Scomo shirk their quarantine responsibilities to begin with?
I assume the media held Morrison up to a very high standard? Oh, no, that's right, they unanimously editorialised for him.Why did the LNP under Scomo shirk their quarantine responsibilities to begin with?
Andrews isn't the Premier either. Gladys left due to a completely unrelated matter.Gladys mucked up. She's no longer Premier and the party she led is now in opposition.
Not sure what other state "had their own stuff up" to the extent of the preventable and unique hotel quarantine outbreak in 2020 in Victoria.
So why did Dan proclaim his hotel quarantine was the "Gold Standard" to be envied by all other states?Hotels were not designed to be quarantine facilities.
Oh ffs...a young kid was nearly killed.
The alleged drivers in the car were never breath tested.
An unroadworthy vehicle was driven away from the scene of an almost fatal collision..
I suspect many posters here are parents, and it wouldn't matter who the driver was, you would want answers if it was your child.
It doesn't matter who commissioned the report or their allegiances...it still contains many indisputable facts!
Or something else is happening that perhaps certain people don't want to draw attention to.Must be a slow news day.
Is there a thread for whatever it is you're referring to?Or something else is happening that perhaps certain people don't want to draw attention to.
Or something else is happening that perhaps certain people don't want to draw attention to.
Labor in QLD is not in opposition yet. They will be soon enough, but not yet.Gladys mucked up. She's no longer Premier and the party she led is now in opposition.
Not sure what other state "had their own stuff up" to the extent of the preventable and unique hotel quarantine outbreak in 2020 in Victoria.