Daniel Chick to Freo??

[Portia]

It seems to be what you're expecting.

Get a top four pick, draft a player, then trade that player for a top notch player and another top four pick.

Why would a club trade for the #1 pick, and then pass that -and- a good player on when with the #1 pick, they can get their own Pavlich/Koschitzke/Ottens/Gardiner/Longmuir and just wait a year or two (if that)?

 

[sabre_ac]

Originally posted by Porthos
It seems to be what you're expecting.

Get a top four pick, draft a player, then trade that player for a top notch player and another top four pick.

Why would a club trade for the #1 pick, and then pass that -and- a good player on when with the #1 pick, they can get their own Pavlich/Koschitzke/Ottens/Gardiner/Longmuir and just wait a year or two (if that)?

Not at all
Pavlich is the exception.
2 interviews that I have seen hardly put my fears to rest if anything they made them worse

Show me where I said number 1 pick and a good player?
I remeber high first round aka 1-8 and chick

 

[Portia]

Originally posted by sabre_ac
Show me where I said number 1 pick and a good player?
I remeber high first round aka 1-8 and chick

So Chick isn't a good player now? Ouch.

 

[sabre_ac]

Originally posted by Porthos
So Chick isn't a good player now? Ouch.

Are you having problems following the bouncing ball??

Hight first round pick and a good player (aka chick)

Maybe I didnt make it blatantly obvious
Pick 1-8 (With chances of getting the higher ones less) and a good player

 

[Portia]

Originally posted by sabre_ac
Unless its chick and a top 3 pick you can kiss that idea good bye.

 

[sabre_ac]

Firstly there is a big difference between 1st and 3rd pick (In my opinion anyway.No I dont want to get into that as there is a lengthy discussion on teh topic)

Secondly the top 3 pick was in reference to getting Wells.

Chick and Well for Pavlich sounds liek a good deal to me.

That said where does it say Chick isnt a good player

 

[Portia]

Your implication, whether you know it or not.

Show me where I said number 1 pick and a good player?
I remeber high first round aka 1-8 and chick

*sigh*

As the #1 pick is clearly in the range of the second statement, and you deny saying #1 pick and a good player in the first, it can easily be read that you don't rate Chick as a good player, due to mentioning a trade of him and a #1 pick in your second statement.

In more mathematical terms (but barely)

#1 + GoodPlayer = Too Good (Statement 1)
#1 + Chick = Accurate (Statement 2)
Too Good > Accurate

therefore #1 + GoodPlayer > #1 + Chick
therefore GoodPlayer > Chick
therefore Chick is less than a Good Player

 

[sabre_ac]

Originally posted by Porthos
Your implication, whether you know it or not.

*sigh*

As the #1 pick is clearly in the range of the second statement, and you deny saying #1 pick and a good player in the first, it can easily be read that you don't rate Chick as a good player, due to mentioning a trade of him and a #1 pick in your second statement.

In more mathematical terms (but barely)

#1 + GoodPlayer = Too Good (Statement 1)
#1 + Chick = Accurate (Statement 2)
Too Good > Accurate

therefore #1 + GoodPlayer > #1 + Chick
therefore GoodPlayer > Chick
therefore Chick is less than a Good Player

Could it be that I just rate Pavlich that highly?
Like I said there is a big difference between 1 and 3 as far as I am concerned which I have said previously.
Chick is a good player but not what fremantle need at the moment.

I showed wat I consider a high first round pick.
I also pointed out that the higer up you go the less likely you are to gain that pick.
Hence where I would like 1st pick I doubt we would get it.

Would you like me to broaden the range for you where I said high first round pick if that will make it easier and more realistic?

6-3 and chick sounds a good deal to me

 

[Portia]

Originally posted by sabre_ac
Would you like me to broaden the range for you where I said high first round pick if that will make it easier and more realistic?

Its actually narrowing it, but thats ok

6-3 and chick sounds a good deal to me

So from 1-3 and chick, to 1-8 and chick, to 6-3 and chick. Any other offers?

I guess if Pavlich is as good as his hype, it would be reasonable to have #6-#3 and Chick in that trade.

 

[sabre_ac]

Originally posted by Porthos
Its actually narrowing it, but thats ok

So from 1-3 and chick, to 1-8 and chick, to 6-3 and chick. Any other offers?

I guess if Pavlich is as good as his hype, it would be reasonable to have #6-#3 and Chick in that trade.

1-3??
Is what it would take to get Wells most likely
But realistically we wouldnt b able to ask for that and chick
hence why I have pointed out we dont want chick.

 

[Macca19]

Originally posted by sabre_ac


1-3??
Is what it would take to get Wells most likely
But realistically we wouldnt b able to ask for that and chick
hence why I have pointed out we dont want chick.

In that case...why did you originally say that pick 1-3 is all that you would take. If you thought it was unrealistic then why say it?

 

[sabre_ac]

Originally posted by Macca19


In that case...why did you originally say that pick 1-3 is all that you would take. If you thought it was unrealistic then why say it?

Macca to the rescue huh?

Well this is if Chick was in the deal

 

[Finnigan]

Originally posted by sabre_ac
we dont want chick.

Are you high up on the Fremantle board?

 

[sabre_ac]

Originally posted by Finnigan


Are you high up on the Fremantle board?

As high as it goes
I am behind the scenes pulling the strings

But just before any one makes any wise cracks I only was recently hired

 

[Macca19]

Originally posted by sabre_ac


Macca to the rescue huh?

Well this is if Chick was in the deal

yes if Chick was in the deal. You said "Unless its chick and a top 3 pick you can kiss that idea good bye. "

Now you are saying its unrealistic to get a top 3 pick??
Id say Freo would be happy with Chick and a 5-10 pick for Pavlich.

But in all reality i cant see anyone offering freo another top draft pick this year. Chick and a 10-20 would be what i think Hawthorn would offer Freo.

 

[dbhattarai]

If Hawthorn had the chance to get Pavlich for Chick + 1st round pick (probably about 6-12), they would do it IMHO.