Rumour Busted De Goey De Gone - Signs on with Pies until 2020

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bloody hell Eddie is such an appalling hypocrite complaining that the media are going too hard over De Goey.

Eddie absolutely hung us out to dry over the Jay Schulz drink driving charge. He made absol8utely sure the TAC had no choice but to drop us.

What did 'Sarah' think of it?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Where was this outrage when Hodge got done for drink driving? Much more of a shit bloke also.
There were a few difference with the Hodge drink drive.

1. Hodge had a full licence not a P player so doesn't need to be 0.00
2. Hodge blew less than 0.095, which means under 0.05 over the limit so different penalties under the law.
 
Mate that's just unfair. Eddie asked her off air if she was really a player's mum and she said yes so he put her on air. What more could he do?

Facepalm. And to think you were a Big Footy Mod during the Essendon Drugs case, imagine the stuff that people could have really said without your biased moderating on the issue.
 
Think people are being harsh, footballers aren’t paid that well and Uber’s are really expensive.



Not defending Jordan’s behaviour, but that’s a whole 0.01 over the majority of western worlds BAC limit.



Agreed.
well, not really... it may be for UK and USA but they are outliers and not standard

http://etsc.eu/blood-alcohol-content-bac-drink-driving-limits-across-europe/

In Europe out of 29 countries a grand total of 2 are above .05. And in any case, .09 is still >> .08.

I know for myself when I'm around .05 because I'm feeling tipsy. AFAIC .09 is severely impaired and when the stakes are so high it's a dereliction of personal duty to drive at that level
 
Look at the Essendon supporters always bringing up the doping scandal.

Bloody obsessed they are.
 
There were a few difference with the Hodge drink drive.

1. Hodge had a full licence not a P player so doesn't need to be 0.00
2. Hodge blew less than 0.095, which means under 0.05 over the limit so different penalties under the law.
Hodge was also a fully grown and mature adult.

He also blew close to twice the legal limit.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Did he get the good bloke allowance?
nah he got a low range offense discount (being under .07 and over 26 years old - 10 demerit points, and as he still had a full allocation of points he still retained his license).

De Goey is 21 year old who recorded a BAC reading 50% higher than Hodges offense (hence why I said they weren't similar offenses). Very lucky the kid didn't do some serious damage. Well on the road anyway, his apartment is another story.
 
He blew 0.068
Still over stop trying to justify it hodge should have got done.

Eddie complaining about the press coverage , maybe he needs to look back at his comments about jay Schulz.

Drink drive bloody idiot
 
nah he got a low range offense discount (being under .07 and over 26 years old - 10 demerit points, and as he still had a full allocation of points he still retained his license).

De Goey is 21 year old who recorded a BAC reading 50% higher than Hodges offense (hence why I said they weren't similar offenses). Very lucky the kid didn't do some serious damage. Well on the road anyway, his apartment is another story.
Agree , what would the outcry have been if he cleaned a family up?
 
Still over stop trying to justify it hodge should have got done.

Eddie complaining about the press coverage , maybe he needs to look back at his comments about jay Schulz.

Drink drive bloody idiot
Never tried to justify it. He wasn't close to being double the limit though.
 
Never tried to justify it. He wasn't close to being double the limit though.
Irrelevant he was over, should not have got behind the wheel,

Take your brown and gold glasses off, just because he wasn’t double the limit doesn’t make it ok
 
Irrelevant he was over, should not have got behind the wheel,

Take your brown and gold glasses off, just because he wasn’t double the limit doesn’t make it ok
Never said it was. There is a difference in the eyes of the law between being 0.018 and 0.095 over though.
 
Never said it was. There is a difference in the eyes of the law between being 0.018 and 0.095 over though.

Was hodge .018 or was he over the legal limit?

Stop and take your brown and gold glasses off, you’re trying to justify Luke hodge who was over the legal limit at .068 by making up a number.

At .018 he wouldn’t have got fined and 10 points
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top