Please no
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Delisted free agents
- Thread starter pablo disco bar
- Start date
- Tagged users None
He's injury prone and not that good anyway. Very mediocre.
Stupid not to promote Mason Cox with so many talls gone and no back up ruckman.
Rookies can play though can't they?
Saintly Viewed
.
30k Posts
10k Posts
Collingwood - Tyler Brown Player Sponsor 2020
Collingwood Magpies - Brayden Sier 2019 Player Sponsor
Collingwood - Jaidyn Stephenson Player Sponsor 2018
Collingwood Board Goal Kicking Tip Comp
Collingwood - Matthew Scharenberg Player Sponsor 2017
Shiny Penny
- Aug 10, 2015
- 48,085
- 39,987
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Will we take any?
frizzle
Norm Smith Medallist
Collingwood Board Goal Kicking Tip Comp
Veteran
Collingwood Board Goal Kicking Tip Comp
Collingwood Board Goal Kicking Tip Comp
Collingwood - Matthew Scharenberg Player Sponsor 2017
Collingwood Board Goal Kicking Tip Comp
Collingwood Magpies - James Aish Player Sponsor 2016
Collingwood - Taylor Adams Player Sponsor 2015
Probably not. Got 2 father sons to nail down & I think we will probably look at promoting Smith.
Wouldn't mind a look at Richards but Dekka knows his worth far more than me. I think we may hang on to the draft picks.
ADD72
Rookie
- Nov 1, 2016
- 32
- 20
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
I would of thought 14 @ 80% 15 @ 80% and 16 @ 73% kicking efficiency wouldn't be such a bad kick at all
ADD72
Rookie
- Nov 1, 2016
- 32
- 20
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
He's played 25 games at 82% kicking efficiency can't be that bad
Pedro
Brownlow Medallist
If we promote him to the Senior list, we have to carry his inflated salary on the books. Smart thing is to leave him on the Rookie list as long as possible. He'll get his chance to play without the need to upgrade him prematurely
I don't reckon we need Henderson, Litherland or O'Shea nearly as much as we need Richards. We have zero tall forward backup. I would also look at Fitzpatrick, we need a backup ruck. Can you put a DFA straight on the rookie list?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nathan Brown was in the best 22 on the AFL for disposal efficiency in 2016 with almost 85%.
That goes to show how ****en useless the DE stat is!
ADD72
Rookie
- Nov 1, 2016
- 32
- 20
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Brown played deep and dink kicked 15 metres some of the others played a lot further up the ground less space to kick into. Teams let brown have that kick cause they knew it wasn't gonna hurt them and if they were quick enough and made him kick long there was a good chance they would get the pill back
ADD72
Rookie
- Nov 1, 2016
- 32
- 20
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
You also have to consider other stats as well brown averaged 10 disposal for 110 metres no wonder he hit at 85% I could hit at that distance
- Sep 29, 2014
- 3,583
- 7,465
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
I know SFA but my understanding is that a rookie can only play (be elevated to the AFL list proper) if he is replacing a player moved to the long term injury list.
So l would imagine Marsh will be moved, so Cox can come onto the list at some point during the season.
I think we will, we would look to bolster our defencies in either the ruck, or key position.
Kicking efficiency counts long kicks as effective. He just boots it long most of the time.
- Dec 13, 2012
- 5,062
- 8,265
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- The Exers
EFA
- May 7, 2011
- 64,248
- 14,887
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Celtics, Tottenham, Oakland Raiders
That was the rule, plus the mid-season elevation, but weren't they talking about opening up more?
doodles98
Cancelled
- Aug 6, 2012
- 6,867
- 8,711
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
A long kick to a 50/50 should count as an effective disposal.. especially for a backman clearing the danger area.
- May 7, 2011
- 64,248
- 14,887
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Celtics, Tottenham, Oakland Raiders
Yeah, if Marsh decided not to come back for now, and has a demonstrated depression issue, he may end up on the LTI list, if not rookied or outright delisted.
- Jan 22, 2011
- 10,792
- 20,990
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood VFL, #TeamBatman
If they run with a senior list of 38, then two rookies can be "nominated" to fill spots 39 and 40, which makes them eligible for senior selection without the need for an LTI.
- Sep 29, 2014
- 3,583
- 7,465
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Wasn't the "nominated rookie" allowed in place of two "veterans" ........a classification which I think has now been scrapped?
Lots of AFL capable DFA's this year more than I can ever remember. We would be silly not to take advantage of this. We will us our first 3 picks in the NAB draft - two being FS hopefully. This means then it is either picks some DFA's or late picks starting at #62.
Lets be honest at the end of the day pick 62+ is 50/50 at very best to play an AFL game. With DFA you know what you are getting and can target what you need, I think it is the smart and safe play given we have some list insecurities, unless there is a big slider I don't see a speculative draft pick being much help at this stage.
Lets be honest at the end of the day pick 62+ is 50/50 at very best to play an AFL game. With DFA you know what you are getting and can target what you need, I think it is the smart and safe play given we have some list insecurities, unless there is a big slider I don't see a speculative draft pick being much help at this stage.
No, there is still a Veterans list. Now it is just the clubs can nominate as many players that qualify and 1.229% of the total player payments are excluded from the Total Player Payments (salary cap) per player, which is a bit over 100k, which will most likely change with a new agreement being arranged soon.
Last edited:
