Didak latest Magpie in trouble

Remove this Banner Ad

RoyalBlue said:
Don't they have a curfew?

These guys aren't focussed.
No they do not have a curfew

By the way, what is Didak supposed to have done that would warrant any action anyway? All he has done is get into a verbal argument, wow, so what? He didnt actually get into a fight with anyone or do anything illegal
 

Log in to remove this ad.

RoyalBlue said:
Don't they have a curfew?

These guys aren't focussed.

This is the point that amazes me. For the lolly these guys are being paid, you'd think they would be giving themselves every opportunity to be in peak condition on the football field. This includes eating all the correct foods, laying off the alcohol, and proper bed times. I can't believe clubs allow players to run their own race when they are paying so much money to perform.
 
Svenny said:
staggers me why players do this stuff I know they need a life away from footy and all of that but geez be smart about it.....

No offense but have you not ever had a fight with your girlfriend in a public space? Ok so it happens, and in so far as him being out in a club at 1.00am or there abouts well I am tipping the spat happend at Boutique and the reason he goes that, and this has been fairly publicised already, is that his girfriends puts of a fashion show there each Saturday night and he goes there to support her. It could all be fairly innocent.
 
LifeSpan-Void said:
and in other news, Tarrant seen leaving Motel at 4am chewing his face off ;)

Would have been later than that, closer to 4:30-5am I reckon.
 
no1bankteller said:
No offense but have you not ever had a fight with your girlfriend in a public space? Ok so it happens, and in so far as him being out in a club at 1.00am or there abouts well I am tipping the spat happend at Boutique and the reason he goes that, and this has been fairly publicised already, is that his girfriends puts of a fashion show there each Saturday night and he goes there to support her. It could all be fairly innocent.

Wonder if he belted her?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Zeke said:
Doesn't matter.

He was investigated, so he must be guilty.

Actually, that is incorrect. If you are investigated, charged, and acquitted, you are innocent.

It's only if you're investigated and not charged that you clearly bribed your victim and are as guilty as sin.

I thought this was common knowledge.
 
Baby Blue said:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20116058-661,00.html


What is going on at that bloody club?????????

Didak lunged at another bloke cause his plastic girlfriend dared to talk to him! What an insecure loser!

Who knows what the other guy said or did or what Didak's girlfriend said in the heat of the moment (I used that phrase as a poor excuse to link to this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvxKcMU4kuo&feature=PlayList&p=613B9D0287E52080&index=31).

Leave the guy alone.

Thanks to no1bankteller for giving us the real 'meat' of the story. One good turn deserves another - http://www.skins.be/wallpaper/cassie-lane/4876/1024x768/
 
Well with any luck the Herald-Sun will be able to devote about seven pages to this terribly vital story in tomorrow's paper. Alan Didak argues with his girlfriend in a public place... now, that is truly newsworthy!
 
really,

i mean i hate collingwood as much as the other 99% of the population, but ffs
that article ( other than the rap sheet at the bottom ) seriously didnt need to be written.

bloke had a bit of a tiff with his missus, just happened to be in public. DOES THAT REALLY NEED TO BE IN THE NEWSPAPER???

lift your game journos.

lol @ "llegedly lunged towards the man." sounds like the days of our lives writers are on long service leave or something, doing a bit a of holiday work at the HS!!!
 
FightFan2006 said:
really,

i mean i hate collingwood as much as the other 99% of the population, but ffs
that article ( other than the rap sheet at the bottom ) seriously didnt need to be written.

bloke had a bit of a tiff with his missus, just happened to be in public. DOES THAT REALLY NEED TO BE IN THE NEWSPAPER???

lift your game journos.

lol @ "llegedly lunged towards the man." sounds like the days of our lives writers are on long service leave or something, doing a bit a of holiday work at the HS!!!

"lunged".....hahahahaha Apparently has been charged with "lunging causing actual bodily harm", "lunging with malicious intent", "lunging with a deadly weapon" and ASIO have him on "lunging causing a threat to the nation's security".
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Didak latest Magpie in trouble

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top