Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone
 
Last edited:
And because I’m totally confused with this case I have two points
-I’m very suspicious of why FM would drive this far to look for William. There’s no way he would have walked this far.
- on the other hand if there’s any chance RC is right in what he saw, and someone took William, they would have driven down Benaroon onto bater creek Rd and then taken their first right into Laurel st (taking a back street way) instead of the continued main way down BCRoad, which would make a lot of sense to me. (Photo is of the turn into Laurel st, I’ve cut the houses out for privacy.)
 

Attachments

  • B323160B-3ABF-47E0-9B82-4240388C7995.jpeg
    B323160B-3ABF-47E0-9B82-4240388C7995.jpeg
    182 KB · Views: 4
Check Google Maps. Street view. Turn right out of Benaroon into BC Rd. It turns into single lane with no lane marking or edge marking. I don't reckon a semi trailer would get far, and if it did there would be very few places where a car could pass or be passed.
There’s many rural areas where semis/heavy vehicles travel on narrow roads. An example is where I live there is actually a road where drivers move over to allow bigger vehicles pass and a bridge where one direction of traffic has to give way to the other.
It’s not proof FM saw a semi, but semis travel in that area.
I’ve added a photo of the direction semi was driving.
 

Attachments

  • 471CEB33-A4B9-4CC4-9848-2F4A5880D780.jpeg
    471CEB33-A4B9-4CC4-9848-2F4A5880D780.jpeg
    190 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Check Google Maps. Street view. Turn right out of Benaroon into BC Rd. It turns into single lane with no lane marking or edge marking. I don't reckon a semi trailer would get far, and if it did there would be very few places where a car could pass or be passed.
We live on a road with no centre line and we have B-doubles, road trains and even the occasional B-triples, carrying grains and other produce from farms to storage or processing. Width of the road is no indication of the type of vehicles that use it. If you are too nervous to pass, you can always pull over.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That's not what I read. I read that the fields can be edited quite easily and further that it's difficult to detect edits when all in .possession of the editor. I even saw a demonstration video

I'm no expert on this.

What is your background and how do you know this for certain?

I take an interest in OSINT. You can edit the fields in EXIF data however the editing history is almost impossible to fake without high end hacking.

Ie if I were to edit exif data of an image and sent it to yourself it would be obvious that I had done that.
 
So because there is no absolute symmetry between the two accounts you think one is possibly fake and the other related to driving rather than pulling over..Ok interesting suggestion.

We may be able to verify if semi trailers travel the road and endorse or rebut LH and AMS scepticism. I think that traffic analysis done some time ago by Stormbird I recall actually broke down the traffic into types of vehicles. We might get some insight into whether they travel the Rd.. I'll look.....
.post 8062 Stormbird.....virtually nil Heavy trucks. The only heavy vehicles recorded were buses..so the nature of vehicle seemingly a lie.

imo there is absolutely no reason to volunteer the information about the Semi. It serves no purpose in the alleged hoax. The singular reason she might raise it is because someone did see her and she was concerned if she didn't mention it it would blow up in her face. If I recall though she only raised it a short time later almost as an afterthought..So she didn't want to attract attention to it whilst simultaneously raising it in case her testimony is challenged. Despite the scepticism this behaviour points to truth.
This is no doubt pretty far fetched, but then so are a lot of things about this case, so

What if she was seen by a truck driver, but not on B C road. Maybe she drove somewhere completely different and it’s there she has that ‘interaction’ with the truck.

However to throw things off track, she said it happened on BC road. … and if the truck driver heard something about her being on BC Rd, he’d think, oh well not the woman I saw them because that wasn’t on BC Rd.

I came across this though which I don’t recall having heard previously ( is it just the reporter mistaking car for truck perhaps, or is this a possible witness to the BC Rd drive )
‘She told police she drove down Batar Creek Road looking for William and stopped at the riding school to let a car behind her pass, taking a moment to make sure he wasn't nearby’

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top