Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone
 
Last edited:
Occam's Razor.

When you have to keep making excuses for different factors in these photos;

Whether it be the direction of shadows and lighting indicating a different day and even month.
Whether it be the teeth.
Whether it be the timestamps.
Whether it would be the neurological development.
Whether it be head to body ratio
Whether it be the items in the pram, the missing Spiderman doll, the items on the table, the different hat.
Whether it be the flowers in the planter pot.
Whether it be the that after the photos were examined forensically that the FM was made the sole 'person of interest'
When the FM supplies other photos at the next available Coroners hearing.

Maybe it's time that Occam's razor is applied and seek a simpler explanation requiring only one act to explain the discrepancy.
I disagree but it's not making excuses. It's simply that I don't believe:

1. The photos were taken in the middle of the day,
2. The photos were taken months before WT went missing,
3. His teeth are not correct for his age,
4. The flowers in the pot are somehow incorrect,
5. The spiderman doll was missing (as it is clearly on the deck).

I am of the opinion, however, that the original time stamp on the photos (7.40am) is more likely to have been correct, as it fits with the various activities the family undertook. That is not to say I believe WT went missing at 7.40, it's that I think it was well before the accepted time according to FM (10am-10.25am).
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You're right and the rest of the world is wrong. I have to ask you this, because I am wondering since your very first response to me. Do you know the foster family? Your over reaction sort of gives you away.
Again you are arguing with me when I am agreeing with you!
Do you believe in Occam's razor as a principle or not?
How is this an over-reaction? The simplest explanation is that everything is exactly as it appears to be, and that everyone is lying. Because the stories make no sense, but photographs don't lie.
No I don't know the fosters, have never met them (to my knowledge). Don't have much time for them. I believe they were unfit to be foster parents. I don't believe the stories they tell - they just don't make sense. I am suspicious about certain things - the drive in FGM car, the hand injury to the FM for starters. The involvement of a PR company. The way they treated William and his sister. I don't believe they ever had William's interests at heart. I think they are selfish and entitled people.
Is that an over-reaction?
 
I hope and pray you are right :rainbow:
I’ve got to hold onto some hope, at this point.

There have been plenty of inquests in Australia that have played out before a suspect was charged and then convicted.

I think about the tragic cases Daniel Morecombe, Lynette Dawson, and the role that Coronial Inquests played in those long processes. But in those cases, the murders were convicted and are currently in jail.

Then I think of the Leveson case, where police were able to be lead to the body, and then I think well, that was at least some kind of outcome for that family.
 
Last edited:
I disagree but it's not making excuses. It's simply that I don't believe:

1. The photos were taken in the middle of the day,
2. The photos were taken months before WT went missing,
3. His teeth are not correct for his age,
4. The flowers in the pot are somehow incorrect,
5. The spiderman doll was missing (as it is clearly on the deck).

I am of the opinion, however, that the original time stamp on the photos (7.40am) is more likely to have been correct, as it fits with the various activities the family undertook. That is not to say I believe WT went missing at 7.40, it's that I think it was well before the accepted time according to FM (10am-10.25am).
Except the verandah would be in complete shade and you have to explain the light on the newspaper. Was someone holding a big mirror? Show me the Spiderman doll in any of the 5 photos. It's then left in the exact location he is sitting in. The photo taken that afternoon looks completely staged.

I will show you again. See the light on the newspaper and the shadow on her legs The light source is above her. See the deep shadow on the right side of her chair. It is simply impossible for it to be 7.30am.
Image.jpeg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top