Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

[Kurve]

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:

• Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
• 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
• 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
• Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty

TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

 

[truecrimepath]

He’s been following the case since 2022. He’s not an expert on that case but he does attend every single mention and court case that the fosters are involved in, so imo he knows about as much as your regular court reporter or crime reporter. I think you’ll find he was in the UK prior to 2022 and very much not across the case prior to 2022.

I would say Lia Harris, Caroline Overington and Candace Sutton and there are others also who are actually experts on the case.

I learnt last night via Spotlight that Dan has no idea who leaked the info about the briefs against the FM. No clue.

Come to think of it, Tiffany Genders is also very much an expert on the case.


All moo

The whole program was a disappointment. Wish I had not waited up to see it. He makes one valid point, the time to concoct a story in the time frame does not fit. The fall from the verandah and dumping his body in the local creek is just horseshit.

Do you like the way they state they are going to give a balanced view towards the FM and then provide nothing from a police perspective. There is clearly a concerted effort to get information out.

The problem with the Journalists and experts in this case, is they just about all got into bed with the foster family and may have to massage their reputations for getting too close. They all lost objectivity.

 

[truecrimepath]

TCP the pink flower photo was taken at a different time because there is a grey plastic bag near FGM chair there are other items under the chair, there is a green cap of some kind on the table. The water bottle has gone so a person has spent a considerable amount of time there. The planter may be to keep flowers there ready for the cemetery.

The plastic bag is in the FGM walkthrough.

 

[stormbird]

"The foster parents", episode 3, Witness: William Tyrrell, 21 Oct 2024

https://omny.fm/shows/witness/the-foster-parents-3

"Description: William’s foster family, and the moment he goes missing."

 

[truecrimepath]

Is a problem when you are reliant upon media accuracy. That plater flower content is different. The other two seem compatible

What would explain the difference? They are annuals flowers and Whites photo was 12 months earlier.

The photographer for the SMH has taken both photos, the plastic bag under the table is the same as the FGM walkthrough. Suggests it is taken within 6 days of disappearance.

 

[31550]

Ask yourself, Had he already outgrown the shoes. It would be nice to have known when they were purchased. Children's feet grow rapidly at this age.

If he had outgrown the shoes, they are unlikely to have been taken to Kendall, or left on the verandah in the photos. Whether he had outgrown them is irrelevant. The question is, "Was he wearing the shoes?" when he 'disappeared'? If he wasn't wearing them, then why were the shoes still not on the verandah when police arrived? If he was wearing them, how did he get them on his feet, since he reportedly suddenly jumped up and ran off the verandah after the 'Roar' photograph? Did FM tell the 000 operator he was wearing the shoes? Why has her answer to this direct question not been made public?

 

[truecrimepath]

If he had outgrown the shoes, they are unlikely to have been taken to Kendall, or left on the verandah in the photos. Whether he had outgrown them is irrelevant. The question is, "Was he wearing the shoes?" when he 'disappeared'? If he wasn't wearing them, then why were the shoes still not on the verandah when police arrived? If he was wearing them, how did he get them on his feet, since he reportedly suddenly jumped up and ran off the verandah after the 'Roar' photograph? Did FM tell the 000 operator he was wearing the shoes? Why has her answer to this direct question not been made public?

It's not irrelevant, it's just another possible reason they were not there. The photo was not taken that day. Look at the McDonalds photograph. Different shoes?

All she has to say is he must of put his shoes on. NO grilling FM is going to make the slightest difference.

 

[31550]

"The foster parents", episode 3, Witness: William Tyrrell, 21 Oct 2024

https://omny.fm/shows/witness/the-foster-parents-3

"Description: William’s foster family, and the moment he goes missing."

Episode suggests police were trying to "set up" FM.
Disappointing thing for me is that the "Lane Cove Ladies" were not interviewed by police until it was eight years too late.

 

[31550]

It's not irrelevant, it's just another possible reason they were not there. The photo was not taken that day. Look at the McDonalds photograph. Different shoes?

All she has to say is he must of put his shoes on. NO grilling FM is going to make the slightest difference.

Kids have more than one pair of shoes. Simplest explanation is the McDonalds shoes (if they are actually different) would have been the ones he wore to daycare and he was wearing them when he was picked up. The next day if he was walking around the house barefoot, it would have made sense to have sandals ready in case he went into the garden - saves putting socks on. Nothing about the shoes suggests the photo wasn't taken that day.

 

[Underarrest_]

"The foster parents", episode 3, Witness: William Tyrrell, 21 Oct 2024

https://omny.fm/shows/witness/the-foster-parents-3

"Description: William’s foster family, and the moment he goes missing."

One thing I take from this podcast is that William was wearing a Spider-Man suit when visited by the case worker at the home in early September. Bio Grandmother said William was always in outfits on their visits, which were supported by the case worker.
Did the case worker ever see William in anything but long sleeved clothing. This would be a red flag. We know they saw the bruised eye as it can’t be covered up. Also, what did daycare notice about his clothing (did they notice him wearing long sleeves on a warmer day.)