Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

[Kurve]

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:

• Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
• 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
• 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
• Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty

TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

 

[Angry Red Bull]

I have seen many discussion regarding time of photo. I really don't know, and I have just let everyone else slog it out. My suggestion was for someone to go to the house around the 12th Sept on sunny and cloudy days and take a few snaps. I am not suggesting were the light source was from, or angle or height. But why not a small weak flash close enough to just impact Williams eyes. The light would not be strong enough to light up the whole area. Some of those camera flashes are a rectangle shape built into the camera. I can see the roof reflection in the windows, not sure of the significance. i can see shadows of the table legs and the pink drink bottle which all seem to correspond to me. I think it would be quite bright at that time of year from 7:30 onwards. Drink Bottle - SH for shadow and R for reflection. It is clearly a reflection on the shiny deck as you can also see the colours of the bottle. The main light is brighter on Williams left side of his face (i.e the right side of the photo as you look at it). His right cheek is in a bit of a shadow.

Edit: sorry somehow my attached files are added to yours. Told you Im not IT.

I've pointed out previously that there is strong shadow from planter stand legs back toward the photographer which can only arise from the light on wall direction of that back wall just off verandah where we located what appears as a light high on wall. I suspect it was on and created those shadows and may also have been the unnatural light source detected with water bottle.

Yes I firmly believe that light was on and reflecting on wall and affecting shadows on verandah itself

There is another such light (matching to that one) that was just above the clothes line off the verandah in opposite direction. I have no idea whether it was on but given the other one possibly was you wonder whether that one also was on too

Of course these being on, if they were, contributes to the narrative of time being earlier than 9.37. Earlier more gloomy put outside lights on. Possible.

All this has been provided in my responses to TCP already which inexplicably have been ignored instead preferring to suddenly NOW find an unnatural light source or two on that back verandah where before he has insisted there were none. If he had confirmed what I had deduced it would make obvious the blatant deficiencies of his total light direction shadow analysis....which for purposes of vanity he simply can't do.

I don't care about vanity or who may be right or wrong. I care about solving the case and whosoever can contribute credible evidence to that end.

People who are disingenuous whilst simultaneously seeking to maintain an aura of superiority p*ss me off. Want to ridicule me directly TCP? and I'll call you an arrogant narcissistic fool to your face. Grow up

My mother has been admitted to hospital yesterday with 3 separate TIAs (which I presume you know about TCP being a neurosurgeon) so I'm in no mood to deal with DHs

 

[Wallace52]

I've pointed out previously that there is strong shadow from planter stand legs back toward the photographer which can only arise from the light on wall direction of that back wall just off verandah where we located what appears as a light high on wall. I suspect it was on and created those shadows and may also have been the unnatural light source detected with water bottle.

Yes I firmly believe that light was on and reflecting on wall and affecting shadows on verandah itself

There is another such light (matching to that one) that was just above the clothes line off the verandah in opposite direction. I have no idea whether it was on but given the other one possibly was you wonder whether that one also was on too

Of course these being on, if they were, contributes to the narrative of time being earlier than 9.37. Earlier more gloomy put outside lights on. Possible.

All this has been provided in my responses to TCP already which inexplicably have been ignored instead preferring to suddenly NOW find an unnatural light source or two on that back verandah where before he has insisted there were none. If he had confirmed what I had deduced it would make obvious the blatant deficiencies of his total light direction shadow analysis....which for purposes of vanity he simply can't do.

I don't care about vanity or who may be right or wrong. I care about solving the case and whosoever can contribute credible evidence to that end.

People who are disingenuous whilst simultaneously seeking to maintain an aura of superiority p*ss me off. Want to ridicule me directly TCP? and I'll call you an arrogant narcissistic fool to your face. Grow up

My mother has been admitted to hospital yesterday with 3 separate TIAs (which I presume you know about TCP being a neurosurgeon) so I'm in no mood to deal with DHs

I’m very sorry to hear about your mum.

And it takes years of researching this case to even start to understand it. You’ve been looking at this case for a very long time and your thoughts and views carry a lot of weight (to me) because you know just about as much as it’s possible to know (as a non law enforcement person).