Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone
 
Last edited:
Read the article saying police applied to have head investigator questioned on stand. Was denied.

There are I suspect rules regarding secrecy of police evidence that could be circumvented if the coroner controls it instead
That is true but coroner can decide what evidence is to be heard public or in camera.
Remember quite a lot of evidence was not made public ( e.g William's sister).
The coroner has decided not to hear Laidlaw (at all). She has also declined to make public her reasons for doing so. I don't think it has anything to do with secrecy. It's about necessity, relevance, procedure, and protocol.
Whatever Laidlaw needs to present should already be in the brief.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That is true but coroner can decide what evidence is to be heard public or in camera.
Remember quite a lot of evidence was not made public ( e.g William's sister).
The coroner has decided not to hear Laidlaw (at all). She has also declined to make public her reasons for doing so. I don't think it has anything to do with secrecy. It's about necessity, relevance, procedure, and protocol.
Whatever Laidlaw needs to present should already be in the brief.

In a way if you allow Laidlaw it's just a mouthpiece to contrive an outcome police want.

Show the evidence itself and let the Coroner decide. That's why she's there....to adjudicate.. Agree completely with her.

I do believe the request was to drive media response and coerce an outcome.......'died at hands of someone known'

Reading between the lines I'd say it possibly means the evidence is so frail that they , the police, need a narrator
 
Last edited:
That is true but coroner can decide what evidence is to be heard public or in camera.
Remember quite a lot of evidence was not made public ( e.g William's sister).
The coroner has decided not to hear Laidlaw (at all). She has also declined to make public her reasons for doing so. I don't think it has anything to do with secrecy. It's about necessity, relevance, procedure, and protocol.
Whatever Laidlaw needs to present should already be in the brief.

"The coroner has decided not to hear Laidlaw (at all)."

Hang on, the news.com article was talking about this week. Maybe it's standard for the head of the investigation to be called near the end (so, in December).
 
The FM had every break for years until Jubelin was relieved of his position and the investigation eventually after all that time of getting nothing on anybody else, properly turned focus to her. When they did, the FD was removed as being in danger and they were both charged for assaults and intimidation.

Of course it's for the courts to determine whether the FM removed WT but she's so full of it anyway.

From the same article:

“I believe that if the police had properly investigated this case, instead of persecuting me, they may well have found the person responsible for William’s disappearance,” she said.
 
One thing I am clinging to is that the coroner's findings are based on balance of probability and do not need to be "beyond reasonable doubt".
So if she finds that William 'probably' died at Kendall on the 12th, as opposed to have becoming lost in the bush, or abducted by person(s) unknown, then she will find exactly that.
 
Just because you do not like a particular journalist or the way they write, it doesn’t mean they are wrong or inaccurate. And don’t call people “sneaky”. The DMA have a legal department too, and you may be hiding behind a keyboard but you’re a real person saying real things about real people.

There are many journalists that saw the merchandise outside court. Lia Harris was there also. Overington was there for a bit, and the list goes on and on. Dan Box wasn’t there. Nina Young wasn’t there either.

At least even you can see that you see that, in retrospect, how ugly it was to have ever sold Where’s William merchandise outside court, which is evident by the fact that you’re trying to deny it even happened and gaslight me.

And don’t come at me about framing things. Every journalist or writer has an angle.

There is an entire podcast being curated with this assistance of Clare and Alice Collins, with JS and SD and their team.

IMO, News are framing the fosters up to be innocent, and they are throwing mud Laidlaw’s way to portray him in a certain light. That is their angle.

I’m really done with this discussion so I’m good to move on.

You know you’ve hit a nerve when new members come in swinging. It happens in other cases here. Greg Lynn case off the top of my head.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So! …. Bike riding could have happened before breakfast.
That would mean William et al. Ate the night before at Macas then breakfast at what 8.30 who knows.
The point I am making is if he did not have a bath/shower he also DID NOT EAT FOR WHAT ABOUT 14hours?
Didn’t eat, didn’t bathe, didn’t shower….
 
The Advertiser / AAP, 04 Nov 2024

From the Advertiser / AAP link:

"On Monday, counsel assisting Gerard Craddock SC reopened the inquest for a fifth round of evidence, saying the focus would be on a theory the foster mother was involved in unlawfully disposing of William's body after his accidental death. ...

Evidence will be given from a truck driver who drove past where the foster mother allegedly disposed of the body at the time. ...

One lead involved a car that was heard doing a U-turn in the street outside the foster grandmother's home about the time of the disappearance, Mr Craddock said.
But police were unable to verify that information or track down the vehicle."
 
So when was the yogurt breakfast?
When he woke
When he watched movie
When they had the fight about toys
When they rode bikes
When he did not want to climb a tree
When he played with the dice
When he drew
When she played Mummy monsters
When he jumped off the patio daddy tigers
When he played hiding with his sister
When he had a silver service breakfast
Wonder if I was 🤮plain Greek yogurt hope it was chocolate at least for his last meal.
😔
 

From the News.com.au / NewsWire link:

"The witness list for Monday includes Professor Jon Olley, Senior Constable Jost Preis and Dr Jennifer Menzies. ...

The court was told the police believed that William died in an accidental fall and his foster mother disposed of his body in nearby bushland at the corner of Batar Creek Rd and Cobb and Co Rd.

Counsel assisting Gerard Craddock SC told the court that according to the police theory, the foster mother then returned to her mother’s home at Benaroon Drive and phoned triple-0."
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top