Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone
 
Last edited:
I can’t believe the police have acted in this tenuous evidence. If they have they need to be sacked.

Nah, they didn't suspend the Coroner's inquiry to launch a massive dig on Peter the truckdriver's non-evidence. IMO.
 
Well the truck driver did not see her.
So the truck story is a lie IMO.
Where did she go in the car?
The FGM may have mentioned that the excavator was being picked up by a truck. She kept her thumb on the Kendal pulse.
How thorough was the neighbours house examined? Did the Pol have a search warrant to enter the premises?
Was this the ONLY TRUCK to drive down that road on that morning?
 
Nah, they didn't suspend the Coroner's inquiry to launch a massive dig on Peter the truckdriver's non-evidence.
This is really getting farcical.
FM sees two cars. (actually three)
Ron Chapman sees two completely different cars.
Peter sees two more completely different cars.
Not one out of these 7 cars or their drivers have ever been identified.

What is the actual likelihood that an abductor would use TWO cars? Two people, yes. One to snatch, and one to drive and keep lookout. Two cars means TWICE the chance of getting caught or recognised. Two cars to acquire and dispose of.

And don't give me the "two cars for two kids" excuse. That's even more far-fetched. Do you know how rare double abductions actually are? (If you don't then Google Evansdale, Iowa). They are extremely rare because they are extremely difficult to pull off, and again, two cars makes it more difficult than one car.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Could only be sister or FGM told sister something when she was banished or chose to leave her home. Families can become the harshest of enemies where wills are concerned. That is why FM was there to protect what she wanted. 😉
 
There are wonderful amazing people who look after and give unconditional love to foster children. They have my greatest respect. They can truely be considered parents.

Unfortunately there are people who take children into care to fulfil their needs.

It is extremely difficult to care for a child but millions of parents achieve it.

FM and FF lost William.

So looks like the family who cared for William for two and a half years till 2014 through evasive answers have protected themselves.

William was cared for by the government the public are entitled to love William. We have a right to have answers.

I will only be referring to these people as carer female and carer male. And female owner of 48 BDv.

These people are now just members of the public to me.
 
The reported inquest Agenda for tomorrow (Thursday) is (or includes) the FM's NSW CC "grilling" (four hours of it).

'A four-hour grilling of the foster mother before the NSW Crime Commission will be played on Thursday before the inquest comes to a close.'
 
Did Michelle White attend to support the FM today? (I think that is her, pictured far right?)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9372.jpeg
    IMG_9372.jpeg
    202.2 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
Is there anything we can identify and speculate regarding that would explain this evidence.? As stands it's useless to totally irrelevant.. I agree the police are playing a game of some sort because without forensics, cadaver nor witness testimony the drive to Cobb & co is worthless. Indeed it more supports FM.

And yet they serious had a throw at the stumps because of Cobb & co.. we are not getting the true evidence. Why?
 
Are the police going to allege FM drove William to BCR and handed him over to these people?

Maybe.

But that’s not the theory they’ve been working on at great expense to the taxpayers.

Police have claimed William died accidentally and FM disposed of his body.

Why the big dig if they actually thought he was handed over?

And if he was handed over does that mean William might still be alive?
 
Wouldn't be surprised if the Inquest is pulling up stumps tomorrow until a later date (hopefully the currently scheduled December 2024 week) to allow time for NSW Police to start/finish investigating all those person's yesterday's NSW Police witness said she had not finished doing her Intelligence Analyst data analysis on yet.

Or that there is more Police investigations work to do into 2025 before the Inquest convenes again in 2025.
 
I should hope not.

I would say it’s the sister. The smoking gun.

Didn’t the police say they were acting on specific information? Not speculative at all…

That’s what they said leading into the big search.

I don’t think I believe a word the NSW police say anymore. It seems more and more likely they’ve been full of :poo: this whole time.
 
Was this the ONLY TRUCK to drive down that road on that morning?
Maybe it's the only one police could find? Perhaps they are trying to discredit the FM account of her drive to show she went somewhere else or did something else. But still don't understand why Peter was required to give evidence rather than just furnish his police statement. Could have been done years ago.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hope it was not done just to send big footy on a wild goose chase.
It's like everyone went to sleep at the end of the last inquest session and have just woken up, like "Where am I? How did I get here?"
There seems to be no direction or purpose, just calling random witnesses who provide nothing of value, and then lecturing the public about things which are supposed to be 'beyond doubt' but in fact are very doubtful, and telling us there is "no proof of xxx" when there is ample evidence of xxx if they would only look at the evidence and ask the right questions.

Did ANYONE think to ask what time Peter was on BCR?

It's a circus.
 
Distraction of what though?
Exist Supreme Court GIF by Creative Courage
 
Hope it was not done just to send big footy on a wild goose chase.
I am afraid they are hopeless. I wonder if they looked at the photos properly. I bet you they have not.

Persecuting people on hunches rather than evidence.

Bill Spedding
Savage
FM

I think I need to talk to my local member of Parliament. There needs to be an open independent enquire into both the case and the Police. Problem is no accountability.
 
I think I need to talk to my local member of Parliament. There needs to be an open independent enquire into both the case and the Police.
You can do that, but they will ask you what is your interest in the case, and they may think you’re a little bit mad.

No offence, I just think it’s a bit futile.
 
Specific information might simply be the FM saying she drove her mother's car down BCR. No smoking gun witness.
Obviously if they are (finally) pursuing the cover-up angle, this drive is the ideal opportunity (possibly the only opportunity) to dispose of a body and/or other evidence.
Say 'something' happens between 9:45 and 10:00. FM bundles William into the boot of the FGM car, tells FGM she thinks William may have gone to look for FF, just popping down to look for him, watch L and make a cup of tea or two ... drives down BCR ... WAY down BCR where the bush is thick, could be waterways etc. by the side of the road. Maybe a 5 minute drive gets her 5km away - well beyond the search area. 10 minutes hiding William. 5 minutes back. She doesn't see any other cars and nobody sees her - Then coming back she gets stuck behind 'Peter' weaving across the road doing 40kmh near the riding school. He doesn't see her - she's behind him, but she worries he might have seen her so she works his 'semitrailer' into the narrative. She arrives home around the same time as the 'home in 5'. FD asks where is William, "Oh, he's gone to look for Daddy's car". Sits down, drinks still-warm tea. FF arrives home. "Have you got William?" (Because I told L he'd gone to look for you).
i'm exhausted
 
Right???!!! JFC.

If anything it points to the finger away from FM and towards this mysterious overweight blonde woman that Ron Chappell also described.

I’m not sure if it’s the daily mail article or if I’m a bit thick, but I can’t see what was so suspicious about this woman.

People make stupid manoeuvres on the road all the time, doesn’t mean they are disposing of a body.

And she browsed an op shop? What’s suspicious about that?

I can only surmise that the blonde overweight woman is known to the fosters and the police know this and who she is. Perhaps she’s the person some claim William was looking at during the infamous roar photo.

Either that or the suggestion is FM donned a blonde wig and a fat suit.
It was big mommas house.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top