Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone
 
Last edited:
Now anyone else that comes on and reveals that they were there, and was actually there, is going to be hard to be believed! :laughing:

Eddie Murphy GIF by Coming to America
They will have to verify by posting a photo of themselves outside the Court House with the FP's
 
I thought you were old like me?

I remember the good old days, when journalists were held to very high standards, and even a minor typo or spelling error was frowned on.

It was strictly facts that were reported and a journalists opinion was never hinted at, unless it was clearly marked an opinion piece.
Note: Will try to act older henceforth. 😂
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Spot on. Her affect is really off.
So was Lindy Chamberlain, or so most folks said. It was half the reason she was found guilty. There turned out to no evidence that she killed her child at all, none. It was all rubbish, speculation, conjecture and bad forensic science. People respond to loss and grief in very different ways.
 
So was Lindy Chamberlain, or so most folks said. It was half the reason she was found guilty. There turned out to no evidence that she killed her child at all, none. It was all rubbish, speculation, conjecture and bad forensic science. People respond to loss and grief in very different ways.
No one liked her.
 
No one liked her.
Perhaps. The media painted a rather unflattering picture of her combined with outrageous speculation. I still remember the myth that they spread, 'Azaria means sacrifice in the desert'. What BS. Katherine Folbigg was another women whose affect seems to have got her wrongly convicted despite not one skerrick of evidence she murdered her children.
Added - in both cases there was a lack of interest looking at alternative explanations.
 
Perhaps. The media painted a rather unflattering picture of her combined with outrageous speculation. I still remember the myth that they spread, 'Azaria means sacrifice in the desert'. What BS. Katherine Folbigg was another women whose affect seems to have got her wrongly convicted despite not one skerrick of evidence she murdered her children.
Same with Kate McCann and Patsy Ramsey.
 
Dan Box has dropped Ep5 (1 hour) of his William Tyrrell podcast series summing up the weeks inquest hearings.


 
On a different note. In 2018, I moved to the Upper North Shore from a Regional centre. Long story, but I was watching the news and the William Tyrrell inquest came on in 2019. There was footage of the FM at our local shops. I soon realised after Sleuthing they lived just around the corner from us and wondered whether WT was in a preschool a few doors down from us.

Their house was super close to a bush track. My dog who I walked would always go off and try and find something down there in a ravine.

Every time I walked the dog, I wondered is that where William is. Evidence says he is north of Newcastle.

True story.
🤐 I am not going to say a word
 
Dan Box has dropped Ep5 (1 hour) of his William Tyrrell podcast series summing up the weeks inquest hearings.



Nothing in the podcast at all about the photos. I think this podcast is quite good.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

On a different note. In 2018, I moved to the Upper North Shore from a Regional centre. Long story, but I was watching the news and the William Tyrrell inquest came on in 2019. There was footage of the FM at our local shops. I soon realised after Sleuthing they lived just around the corner from us and wondered whether WT was in a preschool a few doors down from us.

Their house was super close to a bush track. My dog who I walked would always go off and try and find something down there in a ravine.

Every time I walked the dog, I wondered is that where William is. Evidence says he is north of Newcastle.

True story.
That is a very good point, and the Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park is massive.

It’s been a thought that’s flashed through my mind when I’ve puzzled over where William might be or where he could be found.
 
who is the "they" you are referring to ? ?

******************************

which photo ?
which exact time ?
Sophie Callan SC
Not sure this has been reported yet today.


By Candace Sutton for Daily Mail Australia
Published: 19:34 AEDT, 7 November 2024 | Updated: 20:50 AEDT, 7 November 2024


'In a further bombshell development on Thursday, NSW Police asked for the foster mother to be recalled for questioning before the inquest for the first time since she testified in 2019.'
Correct, the coroner has already denied re-calling her. Told Mr Casselden SC for NSWPF to make another application. The same with Mr Meek
NSW Police wants the Foster Mother to take the witness stand again sometime between 16-20 Dec 2024. (reports the DM tonight)
Correct
alwaysintrigued, are you able to tell us if there was an explanation given for why the photos are now "accepted" or who decided? Thanks for giving us the news when none of the reporters have bothered.
No explanation given. But Clearly they were working on the time from the last photo taken @ 9:37am 12/9/2014
Lets see what Dan Box's podcast tomorrow has to say on this.
Am not going to blindly believe someone without the detail to back it up.
Looking forward to it too.
What was the context that it came up in. What question was asked and by whom. They appear to be very evasive in the answers. “Just believe me”. If this was only confirmed electronically then there are still issues imho. Just because the police say something does not mean they are correct. If they were correct would we have “spedding in jail”. I want to see evidence.

Too much face saving imho.
There were many questions. I have you one example. I don't think the NSW CC would be putting incorrect information to the witness. Again, the photos are correct
The above question is for you alwaysintrigued.
Along with some questions Eaglette01 post in reply to you here
If you are unable to tell us because of any non-publication order related to this matter, that's understandable.
Sorry I was not able to reply, I have a life, work & sleep. This is the first time I've been back on the forum
The speculation is supposedly what the abductor would have done. Her filling the gaps that it is perhaps land that currently has bush/ trees but which is capable of being rezoned and cleared is HIGHLY incriminating from statement analysis. She shouldn't know anything about where he may or may not be including he may even be 3 hrs north in some farmland paddock. It's indicative of where she placed him imo. He could be In a creek or river. He could be down a ravine in national park or buried in someone's backyard

No he is placed not buried in bushland that is capable to be cleared for residential use one day. Flat.

If I were SFR I would be going I over her history at Kendall with FGM to determine whether there were any regular places she went in and around the bush which became well known to her..People do what is familiar to them from their past experiences. Somewhere flat but high bush but still capable of navigating into from car access......and within 7.5 min drive of Benaroon drive.

Wherever it was imo it was thick enough that she snagged her hand penetrating to the point of placement.

What was that place that FA said there was cadaver stench at ? Was it within 7.5 min drive? Logan's crossing was it? How far away?
Off Misty Way Logan's Creek on the hill
The police case to this point is nonsense. I agree people are clutching every nuance of her testimony and are turning an anthill into a mountain.

The only aspect I see as important is the warm bonnet and that she omitted the drive in her first statement. I think this is the only red flag imho.

We have two weeks of hearings in December. Are we going to hear any real evidence? As others have suggested are they clearing the decks? I guess we will have to wait a month.
Not correct. It's one week. 16 - 20th Dec 2014
alwaysintrigued, can I just add we're not trying to harass you (I hope not; I'm not). If you can't give any other information about the photos or just don't want to, no problem, thanks for what you told us already.

Just explaining my own questioning: for an answer to be presented along the lines of "just trust us, you don't need to know" sounds more like something the police would say, not the counsel or coroner.
Could of fooled me :rolleyes:
I’ve wondered this too, but surely that area would have been included in the initial search area.

Not sure if I’m misremembering, but wasn’t FF washing cars on the afternoon of the 12th? Or was that later.

I do wonder how accessible the other part of Benaroon drive is. Many have said you need a 4wd, but I’m wondering if under certain conditions you could drive a certain distance in a Mazda. I remember taking my besties barina on supposed 4wd only roads.
No evidence has even been given about Male Foster washing his car that I know of
It's quite rugged. I think anybody wanting to dispose of a body would stay out of anywhere that might damage the vehicle or kick up a heap of dirt and dust where it would look obvious the car had been taken off road.
True. It has like huge speed humps. A police car actually got stuck the first day.
Agree. But there does appear to be foot access, and it's only a very short distance between the end of Ellendale and the open part of the cemetery, to which there is easy vehicle access from the main entrance.
It would seem if someone entered from Ellendale with William, they would need to hide him temporarily somewhere close by and move him later, or hand him over to someone with a vehicle, or both.
I believe he would have been found that day. It was extensively searched.
She could drive the car up to a point where it becomes more dense, then carry him a certain way, using the bush as cover so that no one would see her carrying a small child.
Nope. See above reply
Who said what in court?

That poster who claimed they were present in the inquest yesterday hasn’t put up when asked.

They just shut up.
Maybe "that" poster was at work & than sleeping, But is now awake & replying.
:huh:
I think there's at least two tracks to the cemetery. One clearly visible on maps and one behind the houses through the forest. One I can't see on a map, but it goes from the end of the bitumen on Benaroon Dr behind the Ellendale Dr houses. I think there is also another one that goes from the end of the bitumen at Ellendale Dr.
Correct
Oh.. there was an exchange between TCP and another poster where they said it was discussed in court as 9.37 was fact and they were present. I'll look back over posts
It is a fact
Well I was there and no such confirmation was made.
Great. Than you know the photos are correct!
It’s like posters are on here to control the narrative and mislead. You wonder who you are talking to sometimes.
Just me, I'm not anyone you think I might be ....geez
When people post factually inaccurate stuff yes. Or when they post opinion dressed up as fact, yes.
But I have no issue with people posting opinions and theories as long as they are prepared to justify them and defend them when challenged.
It is not helpful when people keep bringing up things which have already been discussed ad infinitum - unless there is new information not previously considered. It's exhausting and distracting to keep going over old ground when there's nothing new.
What I have posted is fact. But if this is the way I am treated , I just won't post anymore, no skin off my nose really.
No, I would pick up on that if it was the case.
Thanks
I’m lying. I was not there. But I wanted to show that anyone can come on here and say anything.

I’m also blonde, slim and very attractive.
:rolleyes:
Yes we do TCP
:huh:
They will have to verify by posting a photo of themselves outside the Court House with the FP's

With a peace sign. Or they weren’t there.
:huh:

So, I think I have replied to you all, sorry you obviously missed me ( sarcasm )

Not sure I'll bother posting anymore as I clearly can't meet your demands in a timely fashion, or you try to ridicule me.
 
Sophie Callan SC

Correct, the coroner has already denied re-calling her. Told Mr Casselden SC for NSWPF to make another application. The same with Mr Meek

Correct

No explanation given. But Clearly they were working on the time from the last photo taken @ 9:37am 12/9/2014

Looking forward to it too.

There were many questions. I have you one example. I don't think the NSW CC would be putting incorrect information to the witness. Again, the photos are correct

Sorry I was not able to reply, I have a life, work & sleep. This is the first time I've been back on the forum

Off Misty Way Logan's Creek on the hill

Not correct. It's one week. 16 - 20th Dec 2014

Could of fooled me :rolleyes:

No evidence has even been given about Male Foster washing his car that I know of

True. It has like huge speed humps. A police car actually got stuck the first day.

I believe he would have been found that day. It was extensively searched.

Nope. See above reply

Maybe "that" poster was at work & than sleeping, But is now awake & replying.
:huh:

Correct

It is a fact

Great. Than you know the photos are correct!

Just me, I'm not anyone you think I might be ....geez

What I have posted is fact. But if this is the way I am treated , I just won't post anymore, no skin off my nose really.

Thanks

:rolleyes:

:huh:



:huh:

So, I think I have replied to you all, sorry you obviously missed me ( sarcasm )

Not sure I'll bother posting anymore as I clearly can't meet your demands in a timely fashion, or you try to ridicule me.

So sorry for the apparent attacks. This has been a sticking point to all posters in the thread for a long time. We appreciate you responding and posting as you have. Hopefully you continue to post.

Apologies on behalf of the thread
 
No explanation given. But Clearly they were working on the time from the last photo taken @ 9:37am 12/9/2014
So the questioning of the NSW Crime Commission 3 years ago was based on a verbal or written timeline given to the Foster Mother, that had the last photo of William was taken at 9:37am.

That's all?

And the basis for your claim that the last of the photos of William on the deck was taken at 9:37am
 
Sophie Callan SC

Correct, the coroner has already denied re-calling her. Told Mr Casselden SC for NSWPF to make another application. The same with Mr Meek

Correct

No explanation given. But Clearly they were working on the time from the last photo taken @ 9:37am 12/9/2014

Looking forward to it too.

There were many questions. I have you one example. I don't think the NSW CC would be putting incorrect information to the witness. Again, the photos are correct

Sorry I was not able to reply, I have a life, work & sleep. This is the first time I've been back on the forum

Off Misty Way Logan's Creek on the hill

Not correct. It's one week. 16 - 20th Dec 2014

Could of fooled me :rolleyes:

No evidence has even been given about Male Foster washing his car that I know of

True. It has like huge speed humps. A police car actually got stuck the first day.

I believe he would have been found that day. It was extensively searched.

Nope. See above reply

Maybe "that" poster was at work & than sleeping, But is now awake & replying.
:huh:

Correct

It is a fact

Great. Than you know the photos are correct!

Just me, I'm not anyone you think I might be ....geez

What I have posted is fact. But if this is the way I am treated , I just won't post anymore, no skin off my nose really.

Thanks

:rolleyes:

:huh:



:huh:

So, I think I have replied to you all, sorry you obviously missed me ( sarcasm )

Not sure I'll bother posting anymore as I clearly can't meet your demands in a timely fashion, or you try to ridicule me.

Yet you haven't been here for long and 'like' reacts to your posts are better than two to one. It most often takes posters well over a year of engagement to get there. :wink:
 
Yet you haven't been here for long and 'like' reacts to your posts are better than two to one. It most often takes posters well over a year of engagement to get there. :wink:
I just thought it would be good to post some factual things that it seems you guys weren't aware of, maybe I was wrong?
 
I just thought it would be good to post some factual things that it seems you guys weren't aware of, maybe I was wrong?

They're just testing you. Very naughty but putting you through Trial by Fire.
 
So the questioning of the NSW Crime Commission 3 years ago was based on a verbal or written timeline given to the Foster Mother, that had the last photo of William was taken at 9:37am.

That's all?

And the basis for your claim that the last of the photos of William on the deck was taken at 9:37am
A lot of the questions were centered around when the last photo was taken, which was stated @ 9:37, the famous "roar" photo.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top