Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Suppression orders are in force, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:

BCR - Batar Creek Road
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
One even reduced bike riding to - BR :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

You are describing the Coronial inquest watching a 4 hour video.
The DC did not actually INQUIRE into anything?
Why do they call it an inquest?
Should be called the Coronial video show.
Yep a 4hr video about the interrogation of the FM , how is that not relevant for the coroner? Who was Mr Craddock going to inquire of, it was a video screen. We still have 1 more week left, maybe.

Again, the Coroner has everyone's statements, including the people have been re interviewed after the inquest was closed back in 2020. She knows what's been done by the police. She was shown the NSW CC video.

It's her job to weigh all the testimony & come to her findings.
 
Why is it necessary to spend 4 hours of Inquest time watching a video when the DC could just watch it in private?

If the public didn't see the intensive grilling that the crime commission gave the FM, they would probably want to know why they couldn't see it and what was being hidden.

Crime commission hearings are very secretive. They must have got some special permission to show that.
 
Yep a 4hr video about the interrogation of the FM , how is that not relevant for the coroner? Who was Mr Craddock going to inquire of, it was a video screen. We still have 1 more week maybe left.

Again, the Coroner has everyone's statements, including the people have been re interviewed after the inquest was closed back in 2020. She knows what's been done by the police. She was shown the NSW CC video.

It's her job to weigh all the testimony & come to her findings.
No doubt it's relevant. But why waste court time viewing it? For whose benefit? Why not just watch it privately and make better use of the limited inquest time by actually 'inquesting'?
 
If the public didn't see the intensive grilling that the crime commission gave the FM, they would probably want to know why they couldn't see it and what was being hidden.

Crime commission hearings are very secretive. They must have got some special permission to show that.
True, the Coroners Court was given a transcript in March 2022 & in Sep 2024 was given permission to use the video from the NSW CC.
 
I am trying to figure out why the bio parents of William are still being named in Episode 2 of Witness. Nothing has changed since the Coroner spoke about adhering to the orders for William’s biological family at the recent tranche of the inquest. The suppression orders are still being breached for:

Bio grandma
Bio mum
Bio dad

Why has no one stepped in and told them to stop or take it down?

Those orders are in place to protect children who are in care! They’re not in place to protect bio mum or bio dad or bio grandma, those orders are in place to protect children who are in State care.

Why is no one doing anything about it?

The fact that Ban Dox and crew have never breached the suppression orders for the foster parents in the very same podcast is a huge indicator of bias and of whom they believe has value and ought to be protected.

And that tells me I need to know when considering the info that this podcast presents.

It’s totally biased and some of it (the parts that breach Coronial orders) should be edited or taken down.
 
Did we know this?

Deputy State Coroner Harriet “(Dept Coroner Harriett) Grahame was asked to disqualify herself from cases involving police after video emerged of her mother being handcuffed in a nursing home while suffering from dementia in 2020. CREDIT: YIANNI ASPRADAKIS”

 
No doubt it's relevant. But why waste court time viewing it? For whose benefit? Why not just watch it privately and make better use of the limited inquest time by actually 'inquesting'?
Who's saying it was a waste of court time?. Obviously not the Coroner or Mr Craddock or the police?

Do you also object to what was shown in closed court & was that also wasting court time?

Maybe there is not any more witnesses.

I think we will hear from something about missing persons procedures in December


I don't think the next round will be the full week IMO
 
Did we know this?

Deputy State Coroner Harriet “(Dept Coroner Harriett) Grahame was asked to disqualify herself from cases involving police after video emerged of her mother being handcuffed in a nursing home while suffering from dementia in 2020. CREDIT: YIANNI ASPRADAKIS”

Yes I do
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I am trying to figure out why the bio parents of William are still being named in Episode 2 of Witness. Nothing has changed since the Coroner spoke about adhering to the orders for William’s biological family at the recent tranche of the inquest. The suppression orders are still being breached for:

Bio grandma
Bio mum
Bio dad

Why has no one stepped in and told them to stop or take it down?

Those orders are in place to protect children who are in care! They’re not in place to protect bio mum or bio dad or bio grandma, those orders are in place to protect children who are in State care.

Why is no one doing anything about it?

The fact that Ban Dox and crew have never breached the suppression orders for the foster parents in the very same podcast is a huge indicator of bias and of whom they believe has value and ought to be protected.

And that tells me I need to know when considering the info that this podcast presents.

It’s totally biased and some of it (the parts that breach Coronial orders) should be edited or taken down.

I’m hoping the bios sue. Not just the podcast but there’s plenty of slander out there.
 
Who's saying it was a waste of court time?. Obviously not the Coroner or Mr Craddock or the police?

Do you also object to what was shown in closed court & was that also wasting court time?

Maybe there is not any more witnesses.

I think we will hear from something about missing persons procedures in December


I don't think the next round will be the full week IMO
I contend that an inquest which doesn't ask any questions is a waste of time.

The public wants answers not a video show.

How can the inquest 'find' anything without asking any questions itself?
 
Did we know this?

Deputy State Coroner Harriet “(Dept Coroner Harriett) Grahame was asked to disqualify herself from cases involving police after video emerged of her mother being handcuffed in a nursing home while suffering from dementia in 2020. CREDIT: YIANNI ASPRADAKIS”

Yeah, I was aware of this.
 
I am trying to figure out why the bio parents of William are still being named in Episode 2 of Witness. Nothing has changed since the Coroner spoke about adhering to the orders for William’s biological family at the recent tranche of the inquest. The suppression orders are still being breached for:

Bio grandma
Bio mum
Bio dad

Why has no one stepped in and told them to stop or take it down?

Those orders are in place to protect children who are in care! They’re not in place to protect bio mum or bio dad or bio grandma, those orders are in place to protect children who are in State care.

Why is no one doing anything about it?

The fact that Ban Dox and crew have never breached the suppression orders for the foster parents in the very same podcast is a huge indicator of bias and of whom they believe has value and ought to be protected.

And that tells me I need to know when considering the info that this podcast presents.

It’s totally biased and some of it (the parts that breach Coronial orders) should be edited or taken down.

Maybe because the BM outed herself on Channel 7's Sunday Night, and I don't think Dan Box has ever named the BGM or BF. I think BGM named the BF?

If you google "THE birth mother of kidnapped toddler William Tyrrell has spoken for the first time about what she thinks happened to her missing son." you will see a news.com article by Liz Burke and Candace Sutton that names the BM and links a preview of the TV show. I won't put it here so that her name doesn't show here.

The podcast has a lawyer involved. They probably haven't stepped over the legal line.
 
I contend that an inquest which doesn't ask any questions is a waste of time.

The public wants answers not a video show.

How can the inquest 'find' anything without asking any questions itself?
There were many questions asked, by proxy
Maybe like 2 or 3 days… amirite?
I don't know, will have to wait & see I guess. The Coroner did say the week of 16-29th is "reserved"
 
Maybe because the BM outed herself on Channel 7's Sunday Night, and I don't think Dan Box has ever named the BGM or BF. I think BGM named the BF?

If you google "THE birth mother of kidnapped toddler William Tyrrell has spoken for the first time about what she thinks happened to her missing son." you will see a news.com article by Liz Burke and Candace Sutton that names the BM and links a preview of the TV show. I won't put it here so that her name doesn't show here.
Vis a vis Sunday night programme: That was shown on TV before the suppression orders were issued for the bio family.

And since those orders were handed down, every news company has followed them, apart from Dan Box and his team at Witness.

Candace might have some historical articles floating around from when she was at News.com but since the orders were in place, she and all other Australian journalists have been abiding by them.

*No names
*No faces
*No identifying features

The bio grandma has been named by Dan and Dan has also named the bio father. He’s also said the name of the bio mother what seems like 100 times in that episode and he’s got her name in the episode title, just in case we missed who she was.

He’s also published photos of their faces for the promotional online material and linked articles for the podcast.

If you listen to or view the transcript of Witness Ep 2, it’s all there.

I’m not going to link it, because it breaks the law and I don’t want to share it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top