Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 3 * Coroner's Hearings Concluded

[Kurve]

Continued from PART 2

Criminal charges:

• Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
• 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
• 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
• Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty

TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Please type names out in full for those who are not covered by suppression orders.

For those covered by suppression orders, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:

BCR - Batar Creek Road
FA - Frank Abbott
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
CCR - Cobb and Co Road
GO - Geoff Owens
One even reduced bike riding to - BR
COG - Consciousness of guilt. Like WHO KNEW?

 

[31550]

You can't know what they believe. All you know is what their brief theory is but that's what they hope they can prove on evidence. They could highly suspect 9.37 is wrong but recognise they can't prove it so have instead sought to prove the lesser charges and with the 9.37 timeline.

There is a reason the police walk through of FGM is floating around and that's because I think they leaked it knowing how incriminating it is.

I didn't say I knew anything. I said "they do not seem to". That is of course just my opinion, but clearly they seem (i.e. from outward appearances) to accept the 9.37 time. I say this because if they genuinely thought otherwise, then they have a duty and obligation to pursue charges for (at least) tampering with evidence, and probably perverting the course of justice. They haven't done so and appear to have no plans to do so. It's a reasonable assumption to make that they accept the 9.37 time. Three lead detectives have had a chance to do otherwise. Third parties have examined the photos. The NSWCC has been involved. The coroner has also directed enquiries about the photographs.
Maybe there are one or two individuals in NSWPOL who think differently, but that is not, and cannot be the view of SFR or the entire investigation would be headed in a different direction: Who faked the photos and why?

You may well be correct about the FGM walkthrough. But it hasn't worked yet.

 

[passball]

I'm still wondering if CCTV guy was also used to get the photos.
Such a strange photo to put up of William with his chubby face and black eye.
I can't understand why the FM would use that or was it the Bios that gave that photo or even Young Hope.
The public were talking about that black eye and that the Bios had something to do with it.
That's the public's view at the time.
They should check it again but by different people, too important not to.

 

[Lady O]

I'm still wondering if CCTV guy was also used to get the photos.
Such a strange photo to put up of William with his chubby face and black eye.
I can't understand why the FM would use that or was it the Bios that gave that photo or even Young Hope.
The public were talking about that black eye and that the Bios had something to do with it.
That's the public's view at the time.
They should check it again but by different people, too important not to.

I thought I read recently, but can't find it now, that FM gave them the photo in the fire engine initially, but I can't back that up now.

 

[passball]

I thought I read recently, but can't find it now, that FM gave them the photo in the fire engine initially, but I can't back that up now. the black eye photo have been taken on an access visit with the Bios?

Can't imagine the perfect FM taking that imperfect photo for her perfect scrapbook and to give it to Police to use.

 

[Grassy_Knoll]

I think it was much earlier..perhaps it was 7.39

The photos were taken at 7:37am - 7:39am exact opposite to a magic Oswald single bullet theory that government tried to convince us with for 60 years. We've still got 50 years to go believing 9:37am proof of life. It won't take 50 years, trust me.

If anyone wants to say that XWays is the be all and end all, then put simply you know what side of the fence they're on.
The FACT remains the coroner asked for the timestamps to be cleared up at the conclusion of sittings several years ago. It was her last direction before the inquest went into recess. Upon resumption in 2024 it simply was NEVER was cleared up. Does Harriett Grahame think the general public are stupid? She gave a specific direction, I didn't see Mr Craddock in a hurry to remind her about it, why is that?

In case you have short memories Police Commissioner had issues with Ms. Grahame
NSW Police tried to exclude deputy coroner

Laidlaw didn't see eye to eye with her, Jubelin got on well with her. Interesting??

Moving on, you wouldn't want to overlook leaving a Photoshop red masking tool on any image that might be cause for concern. You know to remove reflections from certain windows. I'd like to ask who did leave the red dot above William's head, was it FACS, NSWPOL, or someone in Young Hope.

They do realize if you mess with evidence, that's perverting the course of justice.

A few might need to look it up,I'll save you under NSW Criminal Code I think it's 10 years in the can.

Good news, they've updated it from 10 to 14 years, it's their lucky day!

Section 319 — Perverting the course of justice. Section 319 provides: “A person who does any act, or makes any omission, intending in any way to pervert the course of justice, is liable to imprisonment for 14 years”

 

[Kurve]

I don't believe anyone 'corrected the time'. IMO that's a misleading question.
Yes the police established the 'corrected time', by examining the camera itself (particularly its internal clock), and the timestamp of the photograph. Noticing that the internal camera clock was approx 2 hours off AEST, they established that the photograph was taken at an actual time approx 2 hours off its 'time taken' timestamp (using precisely the difference between the actual internal camera time and true AEST). Hence 'corrected time'. Police didn't correct or change anything physically. I don't believe anyone did.
When police downloaded or copied images, they would have been copied exactly without anything changing - all the EXIF data would be preserved (except obviously, for e.g. 'time last accessed' if there was such a thing, or anything similar) ... but all the important stiff would be preserved otherwise forensic analysis of copied photographs would be futile.
I hope this makes sense. It seems folks have trouble with this, possibly because they don't understand the concept of 'corrected time' in this instance?

Okay. Who is responsible for the 'CORRECTED TIME' placed over the image?

Are you saying this 'CORRECTED TIME' we can see on the image, is not part of the image's internal metadata?