Dockerland

[dasler]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

I don't know to much about the wafl, only watched two games this year and they were WP games.
So it is good to here duffield to doing well.
I will look for his name in the best in the paper from now on.

I am not a particular fan of this website for its poorly written articles, however it can be informative at time with its WAFL Coverage match reports. Visit www.footygoss.com or alternatively http://www.footygoss.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=index&topic=7 for South Fremantle specific information if you are interested.

 

[oporto]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

The problem with a non club run supporters site like dockerland is that it is sponsored by the president of the Fremantle Football Club and visited regularly by other FFC officials, including Schwab. What do you expect?

That makes sense.....a bunch of "yes" men who are not objective, are not interested in anyone else's views (including their own members) and completely inwardly focussed. Is that what you mean ?

 

[dasler]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

So you are really a condecending opposition supporter having a sledge at the Coach and/or the recruitment officers and/or A player that has yet to play a senior game.

Sorry Dasler, I know you probably mean well, but it still looks like a troll to me.

Non consequential rubbish beating around the point. If I have anything to say I will come out and say it, not code it.

 

[hoss]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

Don't know why you'd even care. I couldn't think of anything worse than visiting a website dedicated to just one club, especially if it wasn't my own team.

 

[dasler]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

Don't know why you'd even care. I couldn't think of anything worse than visiting a website dedicated to just one club, especially if it wasn't my own team.

General football lover interested in all 16 clubs plight, not just their own. Makes for interesting reading when you view other's opinions other than your own and conversing.

 

[Borry]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

That makes sense.....a bunch of "yes" men who are not objective, are not interested in anyone else's views (including their own members) and completely inwardly focussed. Is that what you mean ?

That makes sense.

 

[hoss]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

General football lover interested in all 16 clubs plight, not just their own. Makes for interesting reading when you view other's opinions other than your own and conversing.

Fair enough.

 

[YAKUZA]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

banned for posting this under the Brett Peake

Fair call cougar, but I am telling you if his last name wasn't Peake you wouldn't look twice. How's the talent down at Fremantle Oval travelling atm?

in reply to this

"Obviously someone down at Fremantle reckon's he's got ability or he wouldn't be in the mix and they haven't done a bad job so far of identifying potential talent. They must be watching a different bloke to the one you guys are talking about?"

pathetic

He's not the first player that Fremantle has picked because of his name but I don't think he's as good as the other one despite being an entirely different type. It shouldn't be difficult for you dasler to work out who the other one was.

 

[dasler]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

He's not the first player that Fremantle has picked because of his name but I don't think he's as good as the other one despite being an entirely different type. It shouldn't be difficult for you dasler to work out who the other one was.

Not to difficult at all is it

 

[jarman]

Like many others I do not go there anymore. He can jam his site. I have never read anything ultra Derogatory or slagging that needed deleting. Just supporters who have a different views and opinions.

I guess he is frightened of offending the Freo board and CC. Also does not like anybody who has a different view to his.

 

[ThePope]

I guess he is frightened of offending the Freo board and CC. Also does not like anybody who has a different view to his.

I think it probably has more to do with protecting the players. Why risk offending a 22 year old who is yet to debut?
It's been sponsored by Rick Hart for about 2 weeks, so I don't think Big Rick has Murdoch style editorial control quite yet.

 

[masai]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

He's not the first player that Fremantle has picked because of his name but I don't think he's as good as the other one despite being an entirely different type. It shouldn't be difficult for you dasler to work out who the other one was.

Clem?.

 

[blockerhall]

Certainly wasn't Neesham the younger

 

[YAKUZA]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

Clem?.

Right, for that you have become the inaugural winner of the dasler medal, only joking.

 

[masai]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

Right, for that you have become the inaugural winner of the dasler medal, only joking.

I wouldn't be throwing too many barbs at Clem, he did ok and was cut down by injury. Maybe his application in his recovery could have been better, but he proved he could play.

 

[dugrene]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

I wouldn't be throwing too many barbs at Clem, he did ok and was cut down by injury. Maybe his application in his recovery could have been better, but he proved he could play.

Someone said the only games Freo won under Drum were the games Clem played in.

 

[Farrand]

Re: Banned from Dockerland

I wouldn't be throwing too many barbs at Clem, he did ok and was cut down by injury. Maybe his application in his recovery could have been better, but he proved he could play.

If Clem has stayed on at Freo, I have no doubt that he would have been a huge player. The guy was amazing.

Imagine if he still played now.

 

[Topdock65]

Onesided Views

http://www.dockerland.com/cgi-bin/t...pentopic&topic=13975&forum=Docker_Discussions


Excuses , did`nt expect to win ...its only round one etc etc ...




The comments in this are laughable ...

COME ON !!!!

 

[Kapow!!!]

Re: Onesided Views

Er...it's dockerland...they're never supposed to be taken seriously...ever!

 

[kanabar]

Re: Onesided Views

yup dockerlands a joke

thats why we all go to FreoFanatics.com

WWW.FreoFanatics.COM

 

[Topdock65]

Re: Onesided Views

The only post allowed on there will be post`s agreeing with Greg (sidekick of edited by shane")...Dockerland wont allow any other views who disagree with the post in question ...

What about Hawks killing us a Subi last year , surely being round 1 , with everything on the line this season , we could have been fired up ...and seek revenge on last year .. Not according to Dockerland ...They expect to lose Tassie ..

 

[Slacker]

Re: Onesided Views

Topdock, dockerland has been discussed a bit in the past here:
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=125956&highlight=dockerland

Dockerland, like the Dockers football team, don't appear to have changed much in the last few years.

 

[Dr Ralph Dagg]

Re: Onesided Views

That's not entirely true. Shane has allowed me quite a bit of licence to post my views. I don't think he likes them but he is letting me post them.

He doesn't like, and I can see his point, those posts that just hang "poop" on the club or the players. Especially given many of those comments are quite uneducated.

 

[Topdock65]

Re: Onesided Views

Well done Ralph , Great posts ...

 

[Lach72]

Okay people, I think I have just set new records by being banned, in the space of 3 posts, from above mentioned Stalinist site for questioning the regime over post deletions.

Shame, Shane, Shame!!

...and to think I defended you as a man with a sense of humour...
What the hell was I thinking?

You may reply here but I might have taken my bat and ball and gone home by then...

Strange goings on, i seem to be back in...I dunno, maybe freedom of the press is breaking through??

Spoke too soon, definitely banned...