Won't get used.minor point but we still hold 85 - thread title doesn't reflect that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Won't get used.minor point but we still hold 85 - thread title doesn't reflect that.
Won't get used.
It will be either a rookie upgrade or an academy pick.
I need hugs... and a birthday blowjob would be nice toNO worries, I can offer hugs too if you need one.
trade 5 & 15 for GC's 3 and 24, tell GC that will still get Louko & Rozee with St Kilda taking King, we take rankine
saints will trade 4 because they will get king at any pick from 5 to 8 anywayWhy bother then? They simply pick Luko and Rozee, Saints take King, we take Rankine???
If there taking Rozee and saints are taking King don’t need to downgrade 15 by 9 spots.trade 5 & 15 for GC's 3 and 24, tell GC that will still get Louko & Rozee with St Kilda taking King, we take rankine
I would be very happy if we got Smith at 5.I am all right with us trying to get the best talent we can. But the "we just wanna beat the Crows" rhetoric, is bull crap! At pick #5 we are assured of a great pick up, be it an SA boy, or not.
saints will trade 4 because they will get king at any pick from 5 to 8 anyway
When was the last time we had three picks in the top fifteen? When was the last time we had pick 5?
Rankine Lukosius and Rozee are outstanding SA kids and we will probably get one of them with 5. There are more players in the Draft than those three.
I would not go anywhere near the King twins because if we take one he will eventually want to return to Victoria to play with his brother.
NB Interesting that the AFL draft board has ranked the top 20 players and has Rankine at no5. I hope it works that out that way. They have also rated Jackson Hateley from Centrals at no 11 so we might have a shot at him.
saints will trade 4 because they will get king at any pick from 5 to 8 anyway
No, they might trade 4 because IF get a shizen load deal for it AND they get king at (say) the Crows #8 while getting the Crows 2019 1st or something crazy overs because the Crows are in some theories obsessed with getting to Rankine. Not at all because it's a favor to anyone else. The thing is if you're GC you pick Luko and Rankine anyway because the Crows might go Rozee - but they might as well go Smith to spite us and because he's more ready to go and then Rozee ends up with GC at 6 and GC have their "three SA amigos" retention strategy. So what's the point of the Crows massively overpaying for 4 again?
I don’t know what dogs are thinking but if max is there at 7 they should take him. Getting west as f/s, can get other types with later picks or another year. They still don’t have an established key forward. Saints won’t take that chance.
We had 3 in the first 16. Butcher 8, Moore 9 and Pittard 16. That was after trading out an absolute gun to Hawthorn. See where I am going with this?When was the last time we had three picks in the top fifteen? When was the last time we had pick 5?
Rankine Lukosius and Rozee are outstanding SA kids and we will probably get one of them with 5. There are more players in the Draft than those three.
I would not go anywhere near the King twins because if we take one he will eventually want to return to Victoria to play with his brother.
NB Interesting that the AFL draft board has ranked the top 20 players and has Rankine at no5. I hope it works that out that way. They have also rated Jackson Hateley from Centrals at no 11 so we might have a shot at him.
I don’t know what dogs are thinking but if max is there at 7 they should take him. Getting west as f/s, can get other types with later picks or another year. They still don’t have an established key forward. Saints won’t take that chance.