Demons Dynasty
Draftee
- Jun 7, 2012
- 18
- 8
- AFL Club
- Geelong
After raising this issue on another forum, I thought it was also relevant to pose this question here as well to get a gauge on people feelings regarding this matter. I would be naive to think that a number of people don't have a second team, however I personally believe there is a limit to what can be tolerated.
I have it on good authority, and can have it validated, that a certain individual that is likely to play a major role in the final standings of Dream Team this year, could potentially have as many as 18 teams entered in this years competition under different names. This same person is a Fantasy Sport 'junkie' and has entered in this competition of which there is a prize for the most successful league, of which he has proudly created all 18 teams himself. And will be the likely winner. He has done the same thing in another Fantasy League also.
I guess my question is "At what point should the administrators intervene and investigate the winner and ensure that he/her has complied with the rules associated with the game, so as no legitimate contenders' prospects are compromised ? " This is indeed a topic for discussion and I guess is required to provoke debate and, if not least, bring it to the attention of the adminstrators to ensure that there are no tainted winners and, if not in the short term, we can eradicate these 'cheats' in the future.
I have it on good authority, and can have it validated, that a certain individual that is likely to play a major role in the final standings of Dream Team this year, could potentially have as many as 18 teams entered in this years competition under different names. This same person is a Fantasy Sport 'junkie' and has entered in this competition of which there is a prize for the most successful league, of which he has proudly created all 18 teams himself. And will be the likely winner. He has done the same thing in another Fantasy League also.
I guess my question is "At what point should the administrators intervene and investigate the winner and ensure that he/her has complied with the rules associated with the game, so as no legitimate contenders' prospects are compromised ? " This is indeed a topic for discussion and I guess is required to provoke debate and, if not least, bring it to the attention of the adminstrators to ensure that there are no tainted winners and, if not in the short term, we can eradicate these 'cheats' in the future.