Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
JAMA said:No,
Low grade, in play, carelous not malicous, first offence and guilty plea
2 weeks
JAMA said:Got me there,
3 it is !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gotheroos said:They represent that club and anything like this reflects back on the club. I would it be handled at club level than handing it over to the police
aberdaberdo said:I was taking into account history carried over from previous posts.
JAMA said:Got me there,
3 it is !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My North said:They represent the club when playing, training, or when at the clubrooms not at a nightclub/bar where the fight took place. It has nothing to do with the West Coburg Football Club so how can they suspend pleyers for something they have no control over.
Gotheroos said:But there has been no mention of there names (which is of no interest to me) but the unfortunate thing is the club has been named. So I can understand there way of handling the situation. No football team wants there players fighting between each other.
I will ask you a question. Would you prefer the police handle it if it was you? Would you like to be charged over it? I know I wouldn't. It's an unfortunate thing to happen but we not only play and train for football clubs but we also represent them off the field.
I DON'T THINK ITS A MATTER OF THE PLAYERS BEEN SUSPENDED BY THE CLUB IT WOULD B MORE THE FACT THAT ONE OR THE OTHER MAY NOT WANNA PLAY ALONGSIDE THE OTHER PERSON ALBEIT WAYNE CAREYMy North said:how dare the football club suspend players when it had nothing to do with the football club. Who do they think they are?? So what if they play at the same club, there are other options available as making a compliant to police and let them handle it. If the fight happened at at the football club then fair enough suspend but not when its outside.
TonyCampbell06 said:jett, i reckon you still would have spent a fair bit to retain those blokes. i know for a fact that bloomfield still can't get over last year's gf loss (and he didnt even play) and by the sounds of it i think you're still gobsmacked that strathmore's 2005 "no-hopers" beat greenvale's 2005 "high-rollers" in the most important game of the season. you're only as good as your last fair dinkum game and last time i checked the mores took out the flag, running ALL OVER a tired greenvale line-up. hey jett remember this in extra-time...WINTER FROM 55.........GOOOOOOAAAAAAALLLLLLL!!!!!!! CAMPBELL 40 OUT, ON THE BOUNDARY. STRATHMORE ARE HOME!!!!!!!!!!!! music to my ears.
Dusters said:I wouldn't say Strathmore ran ALL OVER Greenvale - the game was a draw and from memory Greenvale came back in the last quarter from about 5 goals down - It still hurts that I had to barrack for Greenvale that day
bricksta said:And if paxman kicks the goal instead of hitting the post we wouldnt be talking about strathmore so much....
EDFL MAN said:Have to agree there bricksta, Keilor didn't even get out of second gear in the night comp while they rotated there bench like clock work.
The key this year for keilor: T.Paterson (When fit he is unstopable)
bricksta said:And if paxman kicks the goal instead of hitting the post we wouldnt be talking about strathmore so much....
sloth6 said:He didn't, Winter and Campbell banged them through the big sticks. Strathmore won, end of Story. It's 2006, lets move on.
My North said:They represent the club when playing, training, or when at the clubrooms not at a nightclub/bar where the fight took place. It has nothing to do with the West Coburg Football Club so how can they suspend pleyers for something they have no control over.
sloth6 said:He didn't, Winter and Campbell banged them through the big sticks. Strathmore won, end of Story. It's 2006, lets move on.
Aussie_dude said:Just a response to something that some said earlier. I'd doubt it if strathmore over ran greenvale it was more the other way around. Additionally, some one called Strathmore players duds, its a fact that strathmore spent alot more money than any other side in the edfl last year. Given an even administration the side with the most money should win.
But i agree move on to 2006 now.
aberdaberdo said:Mores well under budget last year. I doubt they spent the most, but if they did so be it.
aberdaberdo said:Mores well under budget last year. I doubt they spent the most, but if they did so be it.
Gotheroos said:But there has been no mention of there names (which is of no interest to me) but the unfortunate thing is the club has been named. So I can understand there way of handling the situation. No football team wants there players fighting between each other.
I will ask you a question. Would you prefer the police handle it if it was you? Would you like to be charged over it? I know I wouldn't. It's an unfortunate thing to happen but we not only play and train for football clubs but we also represent them off the field.
Jett said:That's right. They won fair and square. Tomorrow should be a cracking day of footy
Allears said:Seriously My North would want to play in a team or with a player that has King hit you!
The facts are player X, king hit player Y in the toilets at the spot night club. Player X has/will be charge with numerous offences in relation to this.
At the end of the day My North, no player/person deserves to be king hit. Simply if you ask me.
My North said:So the police are involved which is good to see.
I agree no one should be king hit.
mb2006 said:Strathmore vs Keilor tommorow.....do we have to pay for car parking???....supporters from there club say they are only spending $70k...were is the rest coming from??....they should put some back in to there facilities ie:Ground/Surface, Change Rooms, Opposition coaches box...