Not Important
never test the depth of water with both feet.
- Oct 4, 2016
- 9,703
- 15,529
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
yep, seems like their modus operandi.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yep, seems like their modus operandi.
Is it? I always thought the traditional (ie not MAGA) right-wing belief in small government argued that providing for the less well-off was the role of charity, not government.I mean, that's kind of the point: republicans haven't believed in the virtue of charity for a very long time. It's a tax writeoff for them, not a means by which they enrich the society around them.
This is behaviour long encouraged and abetted by the system they live in. If you're only noticing it now, you've been living in a dream world for a while.
I mean, that's kind of the point: republicans haven't believed in the virtue of charity for a very long time. It's a tax writeoff for them, not a means by which they enrich the society around them.
This is behaviour long encouraged and abetted by the system they live in. If you're only noticing it now, you've been living in a dream world for a while.
yep, seems like their modus operandi.
"Free speech absolutist"i posted a K-hole gif on a Elon tweet and within seconds got a bot warning, and had to verify my email. Same with a replied to a trump post, got a limited visibility notification
last sentence -I cringe whenever I read headlines of celebrities (or other rich folk) donating to causes, disaster relief or otherwise. To me, such donations should be made because you want to donate, not because you want to be slapped on the back for being so generous. Particularly when the amounts they donate are equivalent to finding the loose change that has fallen behind the sofa cushions.
So maybe Musk and Zuckerberg have made generous donations but just not bragged about them?*
*No, I do not think this is likely the case.
But ever since the Rockerfellers and Vanderbilts - which is a bloody long time ago now - the wealthy used charitable causes for things other than altruism or charity. One takes leave to question precisely how charitable you're being when on one hand you break unions and viciously apply scientific management wmin your factories and use your wealth to purchase political clout and on the other give significant amounts in charity that you can then recoup as a tax expense.Is it? I always thought the traditional (ie not MAGA) right-wing belief in small government argued that providing for the less well-off was the role of charity, not government.
Of course, that encompasses a form of power - the needy have to rely on the largesse of the more fortunate.
This guy really paid other actual gamers to play on his POE 2 account and pretended he is good at the game? The guy is peak loser