Enhanced Games

Remove this Banner Ad

Pretty sure like 7 of the 8 finalists in the 100m that Johnson won got busted at some stage in their careers. I don't see how the enhanced games will be any different to the regular olympics :straining:

Related to what I said earlier, if there’s no discernible difference in performance it will be interesting. They’ll have to claim PEDs are overrated, or the athletes were over the hill and the PEDs got them back to where they were. Either way I’m watching the shit out of this!
 

Log in to remove this ad.


Plenty of people have talked about it, now we actually get to see it.
It might just be the last bastion of a truly level playing field. What are the chances that in time this becomes a major international sporting event?
I'd argue a certain league already does this.

But talking about the article I'd be very concerned on a number of issues
  • Health and Safety - What regulations are in place and how far are they willing to take it.
  • Will all drugs be open to all athletes and therefore an even playing field or will technically better athletes suffer having the wrong medical team.
  • What effect will this have on the clean competition? Most likely negative.
  • Who will be responsible for increased incidence in medical conditions and deaths as a result of drug use?
  • How do we teach our children the values of hard work.
  • What happens when they start producing super-human body parts. Is that ok?
Personally I think it's bullshit and should not be allowed.
 
A friend mentioned this to me decades ago. Open slather. PED's, cybernetics, anything goes.

Need some pretty strong Legal Waivers though, and a willingness to lose a lot of people.
Human brain inside a t-1000 type cyborg. Is that ok?
 
Presumably they are talking about legal (as in a nation's own laws) PED's.

I wonder who will/would be held responsible for excessive quantity of doping leading to health issues, will it wholly be on each competitor to take 100% responsibility for what they put in their body, or will the organising committee have some duty of care to monitor the athlete's PED consumption.
 
I sense Magnussen's interest is a big clue as to where this is going. $1.5 million is nothing to sneeze at for most of us, or for the likes of Magnussen, five years into retirement and probably 10 years past his prime. So they'll get has-beens and the also-rans.

No-one knows how this will be viewed in the decades to come, it may be a permanent black mark against a career. If I'm already a medal fancy for Paris 2024, it's just not worth it as far as I'm concerned. I don't think I'd even be willing to give up a spot on the Olympic team for a shot at that amount, even if I was a huge outsider.

I'm no expert on what this stuff does to people, but I'd be amazed if someone like Magnussen came within a bull's roar of his PB, or someone who's like the 15th best 100 metre sprinter in the world gets anywhere near the world record. I think it will be a huge fizzer, people will immediately lose interest and that will be that.
Agreed, the genuine top athletes can turn Olympic success into a lifetime of brand recognition and marketing, doubtful they would risk that for something that may or may not succeed. Odds on no records get broken and the games disappear. If they can get just one elite athlete who juices up and smashes the world mark, then maybe it will go on a little longer.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Enhanced Games

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top