Essendon/AFL in secret talks [The Age, 21/8]

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Where have I said we would be found innocent? We deserve some punishment, but not every punishment in the book combined. A fine, yes. Draft picks, yes. We can start litigation if we feel the punishment is excessive and that is what the court proceedings will focus on if it gets that far. I am hopeful there will be no need for this and both parties should wake up and get it done.

ASADA will punish infractions at their discretion, 2014 & beyond.
 
No. He can thank the AFL and ASADA for this. These ******* pigs knew all along and in a sad attempt to justify 'the blackest day in Australian sport' - they ******* hid it. These same assholes allowed Essendon to administer the drug to its players.
If I didn't love my club do much and if my brother wasn't about to be drafted I would never support this disgustingly run code ever again.
All I can do is continue to do what I've been doing for the last 3 weeks - refuse to support anything AFL that is not Essendon related.
Has there ever been a code that brought its own brand into massive disrepute the way the AFL have done?

Your club apparently had approval from ASADA to clear your name - did they show it to stop all this speculation?
 
To Wilson right now, any scheduled meeting or conversation with an Essendon official it either 'secret' or 'an emergency meeting'.

The woman is deranged. :thumbsu:

You don't think there's back room dealings going on during all this, she isn't the only one deranged.
 
That's extremely interesting. Little happy to throw the staff under the bus if it means that the club get off lightly?
How very un Essendon like.

Fancy putting the interests of the club and players above James Hird.
Hirdy is God.

The fans will be furious.
Time to sack Little and find a new Hirdy sycophant.
 
Like I have been saying all along that they are only going to get a 2 mill fine have been having that way for a long time.
 
This is how I would summarise things:

1. AFL want a 2014 season 100% clear of the ASADA matters (including no players being charged).
2. AFL knows it has to be seen to be doing something.
3. AFL wants the bombres to cop their clip over the ear now to be able to start the 2014 season with clear air.
4. Bombres understand this, but are a little bit doubtful about copping a clip over the ear just because the peanut gallery demand it of the AFL.
5. AFL need to do some fast talkin'. They can't actually promise that no players will escape an infraction notice, but they can promise to do everything within their power to engineer such an outcome (and I believe they'd have a few tricks up their sleeve to give them a good shot at precisely that).
6. Bombres have to weigh it up - ultimately, might depend on severity of the punishment and being convinced of what the AFL can deliver for the health of the competition in 2014.

In light of the most recent revelations - I think we can re-visit no. 5.

You'd have to think that there now will be no infraction notices against any Essendon player - so it's now a matter of the AFL and Essendon sitting down, coming up with something which will please the peanut gallery, allowing the four individuals to pretty much escape all punishment, and planning for 2014 in clear air.

The government, ASADA, WADA and the ACC can then go please themselves in which ever way they want. It would now appear they are the most culpable of all.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Like I have been saying all along that they are only going to get a 2 mill fine have been having that way for a long time.

That might be a good call - but Essendon then have to weigh up: why are we paying a $2 mill fine when the ACC, Government, WADA, ASADA, the AFL and a rabid media have done much, much more to bring about the present situation then we ever did.

The pragmatist in me hopes that the end outcome is something similar - and we move on - let the media frenzy descend on the Government, ACC, ASADA and WADA.
 
what outcome is suitable for the other 17 teams, what outcome is suitable for the players who were injected with god knows what? what outcome is suitable for the good of the game?

It's now clear that the "god knows what" was very little and nothing worth worrying about.

It's now clear that we have had a frenzied media response over nothing.

It's now clear that ASADA and the AFL bear some responsibility for allowing this endless speculation when they could have provided greater clarity from the outset.

It's now clear that the Government and the ACC contrived a major issue where there was none.
 
It's now clear that the "god knows what" was very little and nothing worth worrying about.

It's now clear that we have had a frenzied media response over nothing.

It's now clear that ASADA and the AFL bear some responsibility for allowing this endless speculation when they could have provided greater clarity from the outset.

It's now clear that the Government and the ACC contrived a major issue where there was none.
Sorry, have come late to the party. Did Essendon establish what drug was injected into unsuspecting players? You know, the one from New Mexico.
 
You don't think there's back room dealings going on during all this, she isn't the only one deranged.


I think it is more the use of language to discredit again. She could say they were in talks, or negotiating etc, but 'Secret Talks' implies something sinister etc, when it would be standard for anyone in this position. Courts are always the last alternative.
 
Can't you show us where so that we can share your outrage? And "lots" is generally considered more the one.
If you are that interested - search through the many threads on the topic. I can't remember which one. I know it was when some article mentioned thymosin being used to treat cancer and from there the jokes about Hird and players having cancer started.
There has also been many posts that state James Hird is worse than Hitler.

I'm not searching for these disgusting posts - you can do that
 
No
because Dank has it. The club inquired with Federal police months ago how to force Dank to provide the document. All they could do in the meantime is constantly tell the public that they had the all clear on AOD9604 but none of you would listen because Carowhine and Phatprick told you not to

You don't think dank would have shown this if he actually had it? Let your club AND his reputation get flushed down the toilet, all the while hanging on to vital evidence that would clear you both? That is hilarious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top