Everitt for Gartlett on the other hand, would be something worth considering.
I would set Visy Park on fire if that were to ever happen. What rubbish.
How about Judd for Williams?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Everitt for Gartlett on the other hand, would be something worth considering.
You want small forwards? Would you part with your first pick for Eddie Betts?
stefoid.....I wouldn't call Walker a tall. More a mid-size.
He is often asked to play on taller opponents so he can run off them. But he is never going to be a Key Position player forward or back.
He played as a defensive forward against Sydney and did well.
I don't think Carlton are going to trade out Walker because he has upside...but Everitt would suit their needs nicely. At his height, he tall enough to play Key Position and can play a utility role as well.
I would say Everitt fits the Blues needs more than Walker fits the Dogs needs. However if Harbrow goes, then Walker can play a back pocket role. However they still have Easton Wood coming through.
Perhaps they could use him more as a half forward with Johnson and Aka gone.
But purely from an outside point of view....trade currency is about even.
Walker perhaps has a bit more experience but has massive injury concerns...whilst Everitt has been given no opportunity so the Dogs can't demand too much. They nearly parted with him for Pick 25 last year.
thar you go... make the most out of your picks by trading the early ones... then use your later ones for the F/S... can't you do that...1st round = Wallis 2nd round libba
thar you go... make the most out of your picks by trading the early ones... then use your later ones for the F/S... can't you do that...
eg. trade your 1st and 2nd rounder and get gun players... then when someone nominates to take Wallis and Libba... use your next best pick, which is 3rd and 4th rounder.... I know there's a flaw somewhere in this logic... do you nominate your taking F/S with certain picks before trade week? if so, how can teams outbid the other???
ok... Carlton like the look of Wallis... Dogs will try to get him with the latest pick possible... when does the bidding begin? Before trade week?Take a few minutes to think about it, then post your conclusion.
ok... Carlton like the look of Wallis... Dogs will try to get him with the latest pick possible... when does the bidding begin? Before trade week?
and now that you have two... Carlton like Wallis with their number 1.... Essendon like Libba with their number 1 pick... what happens???
So even though Libba might be say worth top 10 and Essendon are willing to give top 10 for him... you would get him with pick 40 something... well out of all the draft to have F/S... dogs have hit the jackpot1st round = Wallis 2nd round libba
So even though Libba might be say worth top 10 and Essendon are willing to give top 10 for him... you would get him with pick 40 something... well out of all the draft to have F/S... dogs have hit the jackpot
with their next pick!!! my mistakeIf other teams had a chance to pick up a F/S before that team even had a pick it would be called - 'the draft'.
1st round = Wallis 2nd round libba
with their next pick!!! my mistake
the question relates to two F/S in the one draft... i would've thought that if two teams were prepared to offer first round picks for the players... and the rule is, if the team want to get the player under F/S... then they will need to nominate their next pick... in the example I gave, essendon want libba, carlton want wallis... Bulldogs nominate wallis... so essendon should be able to pick up libba... it's that part I don't understand the rule and hence asking the question.. and hence expect a non-sarcastic/non-ill-toned answer...
would do it but i would prefer giving away betts instead of walker
Walker's dad on the other Carlton site says his son isn't going anywhere. Looks like he'll fit nicely at half forward for us.A straight swap between the Western Bulldogs and Carlton, Everitt for Andrew Walker?
Why?. He was touted as an All-Australian near round 16. A few bad games happens to everyone, especially playing the position Betts does. Supporters need a memory span that lasts beyond a few games.would do it but i would prefer giving away betts instead of walker
would do it but i would prefer giving away betts instead of walker
Walker's dad on the other Carlton site says his son isn't going anywhere. Looks like he'll fit nicely at half forward for us.
After 1 game? Everitt is useless he should be only swapped with the Dowler's and Newton's. Walker for Jones?Walker's dad on the other Carlton site says his son isn't going anywhere. Looks like he'll fit nicely at half forward for us.
After 1 game? Everitt is useless he should be only swapped with the Dowler's and Newton's. Walker for Jones?
Carlton were rumoured to want to trade Walker last year.I've heard from another family member that he wants out but Carlton won't let him go.
I doubt that Everitt will develop into a KPP like Reid, Frawley, Pears and Brown. Even Waite isn't a genuine power KPP at his height and size. I see Everitt playing more the Gilbert, Goldsack and Bower role as a rebounding tall. Or possibly like Sam Fisher if he lives up to his draff position and talent. If Everitt wasn't a first round, you would be questioning why he hasn't cemented a spot in their best 22 in his fourth season.I don't think Carlton are going to trade out Walker because he has upside...but Everitt would suit their needs nicely. At his height, he tall enough to play Key Position and can play a utility role as well.
I would say Everitt fits the Blues needs more than Walker fits the Dogs needs. However if Harbrow goes, then Walker can play a back pocket role. However they still have Easton Wood coming through.
Perhaps they could use him more as a half forward with Johnson and Aka gone.
But purely from an outside point of view....trade currency is about even.
Walker perhaps has a bit more experience but has massive injury concerns...whilst Everitt has been given no opportunity so the Dogs can't demand too much. They nearly parted with him for Pick 25 last year.