Haha, I did about 4 weeks ago after he started to show some form in the magoos..Who else snuck on and checked Ben Ronkes availability? Wowee
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha, I did about 4 weeks ago after he started to show some form in the magoos..Who else snuck on and checked Ben Ronkes availability? Wowee
Was he bagging goals or getting touches?Haha, I did about 4 weeks ago after he started to show some form in the magoos..
I knew he was highly rated last year, but was injured.. Both games were good (from memory very high tackle numbers, 20+ touches and hit the scoreboard), but nothing like Friday night.Was he bagging goals or getting touches?
Tend to only visit pages of clubs I have players for.
Currently no swans, until yesterday no saints, no tigers, no port ect
We will see. I am happy to be short-price favourites if I winThere’s no playing the underdog anymore TW. You have to assume favourite status
Most UF relevant backline players are6 AFL debuts from the Sparrows this year!
Ridley is another tackle averse players for my backline!
Ok so it the rest of my team that's the issue? Losing tackles like 20-80 vs RockfordMost UF relevant backline players are
Re Tackles, Seedsman is top 10 in Tackles out of the regular best 22 Backs, and has an average of only 3.4 tackles a game. So if you are relying on Backs to increase your tackle numbers you are in strifeOk so it the rest of my team that's the issue? Losing tackles like 20-80 vs Rockford
You are a stats man arnt you tender!Re Tackles, Seedsman is top 10 in Tackles out of the regular best 22 Backs, and has an average of only 3.4 tackles a game. So if you are relying on Backs to increase your tackle numbers you are in strife
Ok so it the rest of my team that's the issue? Losing tackles like 20-80 vs Rockford
Haha, well it is a stats gameYou are a stats man arnt you tender!
It looks like it will be a tight finish!Pick and choose which players fit your strengths. You only need to win 5 categories (which I think you probably will in our matchup). It doesn’t matter if I win tackles 110-20 if you end up winning score, %, marks, hit outs and FAs
Shhh was not saying anything about that fact hahaPick and choose which players fit your strengths. You only need to win 5 categories (which I think you probably will in our matchup). It doesn’t matter if I win tackles 110-20 if you end up winning score, %, marks, hit outs and FAs
That is a great result! Who needs tackles!Biggest upset of my career!
Was one I wouldn't win often though imo, Degoey kicking 6 obviously being the difference , doubt I dent Rockford s season to much though.
Biggest upset of my career!
Was one I wouldn't win often though imo, Degoey kicking 6 obviously being the difference , doubt I dent Rockford s season to much though.
Bugger meAssuming they run an audit or something like that when they process the results I think we're going to end up with a draw!
They've counted Jack Martin's stats though he was a late out.. which, in theory, means that Stringer's 1.0 ties us up on score.
Also bloody Petracca kicked one out on the full yesterday from about 40 on a 45 degree angle.....
Got Cam Sutcliffe here for you aka as the Rolls Royce of backs. You don't need to check his stats or games played, we've made a fair few deals over the last 18 months have i ever done you wrong? Didn't think so. Happy to take Charlie Cameron, we good ye?Warriors are interested in potentially trading two (or three?) of the following in a package (with picks used to even it up) for a top quality back.
- Jack Watts
- Charlie Cameron
- Brandon Matera
- Sam Lloyd
- Patrick Wilson
It is not a fire-sale, but looking to even up squad a bit if there is value in doing it!