List Mgmt. FFS can we give Lynch a contract

Remove this Banner Ad

MrBarry said:
Both Fogarty and TT are AFL standard.

I'm not concerned about our KPF stocks at all. I'd be getting rid of Frampton, Berg and Lynch though and bringing in an additional tall.
Click to expand...
Fogarty at this point looks like a poor mans Stringer to me. Could come good but probably won’t. Sure we keep him but we need at least 2 more genuine KPFs on our list to have any chance of completing with the big boys.
 
Crowked said:
Fogarty at this point looks like a poor mans Stringer to me. Could come good but probably won’t. Sure we keep him but we need at least 2 more genuine KPFs on our list to have any chance of completing with the big boys.
Click to expand...

My view is he will end up being better than Stringer. Think you are being extremely harsh on him.

Got the potential to be an absolute A Grader.

We need midfielders not KPFs.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

jackster83 said:
Think he'll get a one year contract extension now. Walker being suspended means we don't have any senior players in the front half.
Click to expand...

the last thing we need is more of the same. The crutch of our club has always been that we need to not deviate from the norm, we need to train the newbies to be exactly the same. Best result is that Sloane is moved on and we don't re-sign anyone else and Doedee takes control.
 
If Tex doesn't play on then maybe.
 
Had a great game, best I've seen from Lynch in some time. Showcasing what he can provide to a contender that he should go to next year (unless he milks a team like GC to a longer deal).
 
I think Lynch's performance the other night pushed up his value to a respective club. Hoping we get a late 2nd rounder for him.
 
Hmm… A few weeks ago I didn’t want to see Tommy The Unready in a Crows guernsey again.

He has been one of our better players since his return though, and one of the few that look like kicking goals.

Also, I’m not sure who on the list currently looks like replacing him long term.

So long as we can finally get rid of #14, and he doesn’t try and play injured, I’m almost inclined to keep him on for another year.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
MrBarry said:
Both Fogarty and TT are AFL standard.

I'm not concerned about our KPF stocks at all. I'd be getting rid of Frampton, Berg and Lynch though and bringing in an additional tall.
Click to expand...
If they move out Walker and Hinmelberg they definitely will look to bring someone in. Riccardi and Coleman-Jones seem to get linked to us. Nick's would have known Riccardi from his time at gws. Weideman may be out of Melbourne as well and could be another option if he wants to get out of melb.
I think a forward line of Thilthorpe, Fogarty, Riccardi/Coleman-Jones, Gollant, Cook, Rankine(2023), Sloane could work. They may bring Wingard in cheap if he wants to come home and hawthorn want to clear salary. If the Hawks pay some of the salary they may have a look. I probably wouldn't go there but he would be an upgrade on Murphy or Rowe.
 
Last edited:
Murray2503 said:
If they move out Walker and Hinmelberg they definitely will look to bring someone in. Riccardi and Coleman-Jones get linked to us. Nick's would have known Riccardi from his time at gws. Weideman may be out of Melbourne as well.
Click to expand...
Or we just play either McAsey or Murray forward....
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

DJ75 said:
Or we just play either McAsey or Murray forward....
Click to expand...
Have to play at least one back and need cover for unjury. McAsey is a bit of a concern that a rookie has overtaken him. Probably why they are trying him forward.
 
Played ok, but he is 30 and he didn't do anything he hasn't already done. High pressure game, did some alright things, also some horrendous turnovers. Ship him out and see what we can get. We don't need a 30+ year old flat track forward with injury concerns.

Edit:

I want to say that Lynch has played some great games for us, and even if I think he enjoys the flat track a bit, he has added a lot to the side when we have been up and about. However, the value prospect of Lynch as a player is very different for Lynch at 30 compared to Lynch at 25, we aren't up and about and we won't be in time for Lynch to give the requisite value a new contract would warrant.
 
Last edited:
Deaneus! said:
Are we hoping to trade or delist? Correct me if I’m wrong, he just became worthless in a trade, right. Because we’re getting rid of him anyway?
Click to expand...

He's an out of contract free agent. No-one is going to bother trading for him which shows we know he doesn't have any significant trade value.
 
Deaneus! said:
Are we hoping to trade or delist? Correct me if I’m wrong, he just became worthless in a trade, right. Because we’re getting rid of him anyway?
Click to expand...
His value is unchanged because he's a free agent. Even if we wanted to keep him and he was offered a contract elsewhere, we'd be looking at a crappy compensation pick at best
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

adelaidecrows
Roast Roo has to go and he can take Nicks with him....Sloane, Murphy and Smith can go as well.
Replies
1
Views
463
craig crowing
C
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
  • Poll
Make the 8 and anything can happen
4 5 6 7 8
Replies
198
Views
7K
adelaidecrows
adelaidecrows
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Game Day Adelaide vs Brisbane: 4-5 Season alive or 3-6 Give us picks
61 62 63 64 65
Replies
2K
Views
22K
GreyCrow
GreyCrow
skam85
Do we lose again ??
Replies
16
Views
612
Golumless
Golumless
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
  • Poll
Will we have a debutant this season?
2 3 4 5
Replies
104
Views
4K
crows dude
C
B
giving non-Victorian teams a fair go
Replies
17
Views
1K
bigman
B
weekend at bernies
When do we ask the AFL for our priority pick??
Replies
19
Views
605
FR0GGY
FR0GGY

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top