- Jul 30, 2018
- 11,782
- 15,178
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Banned
- #1,751
“I stand with workers only on the occasion a loathsome individual is opposed to them” is not a political position.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
There is a politics outside of promoting or rejecting trans pronouns.If you need Peter Reith to exist before considering solidarity then your politics are formed in reaction, not from first principles.
I’m generally opposed to science denialism and rejections of reality, yes.There is a politics outside of promoting or rejecting trans pronouns.
No, you misread my point.“I stand with workers only on the occasion a loathsome individual is opposed to them” is not a political position.
No where in his post does he encourage anybody to discriminate against gay people. That is the problem with the rainbow brigade. They’ve taken the biblical verse he posted as if it’s a call to arms to exterminate the entire homosexual population.It's not about rugby, it's about his position of being of Rugby Australia's most influential employees and one of Australia's biggest sporting stars promoting the idea that not all people are equal, I.e. homosexuality is a sin and homosexual should all repent so they don't burn in hell.
Which is essentially promoting discrimination against the LGTBQI community and going against the work that his employer has done in promoting equal treatmemt of this group.
Lets not forget atheistsIt's not about rugby, it's about his position of being of Rugby Australia's most influential employees and one of Australia's biggest sporting stars promoting the idea that not all people are equal, I.e. homosexuality is a sin and homosexual should all repent so they don't burn in hell.
Which is essentially promoting discrimination against the LGTBQI community and going against the work that his employer has done in promoting equal treatmemt of this group.
What "rape shit"?I don’t know what game you are playing, but you need to grow up and shut your mouth with this rape ****.
You don’t know who on here has been r*ped or sexually abused. Can tell you they sure as hell aren’t all white dudes doing it. You piece of ****.
Leave it alone.
What "rape ****"?
Why are you being so insulting?
You and CheapCharlie have reacted in a ridiculous manner.
For your clarification, here was my post.It’s a discussion on Folau’s tweets about people going to hell....yet you thought it was appropriate to make the utterly irrelevant and offensive comment ‘the only ones defending Folau, are rapists, paedophiles and white men’....do you deny making that comment?
And as I said, you have no idea if contributors to this forum have been sexually abused, or by whom.
Bottom line, what you said is irrelevant and offensive. So shut your mouth.
Note to Mods - if someone was to post a comment like this ‘the only ones defending Folau are rapists, paedophiles and black men’ would you come down down on that poster like a ton of absolute bricks?
I know at least one of you would, so I would ask why this clowns post has been allowed to stand?
As you can see, I wrote "It would seem that the people defending Folau are pedophiles, rapists or white men."It would seem that the people defending Folau are pedophiles, rapists or white men.
We have a thread that's sole purpose is to catalogue crime committed by African Australians.Note to Mods - if someone was to post a comment like this ‘the only ones defending Folau are rapists, paedophiles and black men’ would you come down down on that poster like a ton of absolute bricks?
We have a thread that's sole purpose is to catalogue crime committed by African Australians.
You wanted untrammeled free speech, don't cry when you get it back.
There it is mods.
Plain as day, and still undeleted.
How can anyone say this is appropriate language for this forum?
What is your problem with my post?Don’t be a smart arse.
There is a thread that simply catalgogues crime potentially committed by African Australians. Post away.So if I start using general terms like ‘black men’ on here, Malifice isn’t going to come down on me thirty seconds later?
So why is it ok for people to generalise about whites, and don’t give me any of this intersectional disadvantage bollocks.
What is your problem with my post?
Try using your words.
Cm86, one of our resident bigotsWhat is your problem with my post?
Try using your words.
I'm very sorry to hear about your experience.My problem hero, is I am a ‘white man’ and when I was in high school, I had two older Aboriginal boys try and rape me on a camp.
Now I have to sit here and see people trivialising rape and inserting race into a discussion on Israel Folau’s use of social media, when I know full well, not all paedos and rapists are ‘white males’.
And while we are at it, where are all these paedos and rapists defending him? Direct quotes? Or was it just a grubby throwaway bit of trolling for the lulz?
So you feel that I am linking white men with rapists and pedophiles, because I used them in the same list?No, you just lumped white men alongside them in the same sentence.
Stop bitchingCm86, one of our resident bigots
I think you were deliberately trying to associate the groups. Yes.
What were you last banned for?Stop bitching
You know the rules
The owner of this site will do nothing about this as he agrees with the posters doing this
If anything you will get modded