ha ha. Double-r Garry had a REAL tea towel number on last night 
FTA-TV Footy Classified
- Thread starter voodooguru
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Jun 23, 2008
- 33,486
- 27,235
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Norwood, Everton, Detroit Red Wings
ha ha. Double-r Garry had a REAL tea towel number on last night
Looked like a display tea towel, amirite Shell?
on second thoughts, more like kitchen curtains
Someone's takin the piss. I can't believe for a second that those shirts are really in fashion.
Last edited:
The Velvet Sledge was rocking a fine-checked, red tea towel number last night, and Hutcho had more height in his foofed-up, combed-forward shag
WALDENPOND
Club Legend
- Jan 17, 2014
- 2,010
- 1,741
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Anyone know why it's not on tonight and on tommorow instead.
Chicken Parma
Team Captain
It might have something to do with Nine conceding tonight to the MasterChef grand final ratings wise (Seven's doing something similar)
^ yeah, they did that earlier in the year
Shell
Premium Platinum
It was a long show tonight (~1hr 7m), and no tea towel shirts.
I suppose the Hardwick interview took up some time.
I suppose the Hardwick interview took up some time.
Nah the Adam Goodes thing did also I enjoyed hutchys moral high ground too
Oh crap. Richmond won. That'll be the first 20 minutes of this week's show taken. Because everyone knows Richmond winning is "good for football".
Essendon smashed again, so a bit about that, "but taking nothing away from the Bulldogs, who were magnificent", etc.
There was a draw and Hutchy hates those, so they'll be a bit about him wanting extra time or a shootout, etc.
Some Adam Goodes stuff, the gift that never starts giving, and another Melbourne false dawn should round things up.
This show practically writes itself. Only a bombshell with some fallout between now and 9:37pm can save it this week.
Essendon smashed again, so a bit about that, "but taking nothing away from the Bulldogs, who were magnificent", etc.
There was a draw and Hutchy hates those, so they'll be a bit about him wanting extra time or a shootout, etc.
Some Adam Goodes stuff, the gift that never starts giving, and another Melbourne false dawn should round things up.
This show practically writes itself. Only a bombshell with some fallout between now and 9:37pm can save it this week.
Ha ha. Good predictions but, as you say, it ain't hard to forecast what's gunna be on.
However, I reckon there'll more than "some" Goodes stuff, coz Caro loves it
However, I reckon there'll more than "some" Goodes stuff, coz Caro loves it
Last edited:
Ah, jeez! Really? That'll go forever.
Let's guess how long. Hmmm, I can't see it going for more than one segment (not separated by an ad-break), so I reckon it'll be a big 24 mins, and maybe it will even open the show after a short intro. If not, then definitely the 2nd segment, after a short first one
Last edited:
Caro is going to go in on Gill.Ah, jeez! Really? That'll go forever.
Let's guess how long. Hmmm, I can't see it going for more than one segment (separated by an ad-break), so I reckon it'll be a big 24 mins, and maybe it will even open the show after a short intro. If not, then definitely the 2nd segment, after a short first
Second segment I reckon, which generally is the norm for guests.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk
- Thread starter
- #1,068
Gil in the Hot Seat!
- Thread starter
- #1,069
"Maybe" on that whack-arsed, half baked score review? Meh.
Gil's a cool cucumber. I appreciate that after that idjit Demetridoh.
Gil's got a nice line in "semi-crazy eye" and "lower lip-only smirk". He gave Craig the crazy eye a couple times and sneaky smirked when they were discussing Tan Man Hird.
Gil's a cool cucumber. I appreciate that after that idjit Demetridoh.
Gil's got a nice line in "semi-crazy eye" and "lower lip-only smirk". He gave Craig the crazy eye a couple times and sneaky smirked when they were discussing Tan Man Hird.
- Oct 7, 2013
- 750
- 1,039
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Seattle Supersonics
I will never bother to watch this craap again. Critiquing Gil's response to a BS question on radio related to a BS media created issue does not maketh good tv. 'Footy Tedium' would be a more apt title.
- Thread starter
- #1,071
Ohhhhh! Rohan C. calls Hutchy a "nupty" for frothing over last weekend's draw.
Tick.
Tick.
- Thread starter
- #1,072
Caro's Arrow flies through the air and hits Clarko right in the top of his pointy, angry ant head.
Ouch!
Solid ep even though they forgot to ask Gil-Mac about his Year of the Fan initiative.
7.5-10
Ouch!
Solid ep even though they forgot to ask Gil-Mac about his Year of the Fan initiative.
7.5-10
- Apr 27, 2008
- 65,930
- 80,413
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Chael Sonnen: Moral Champion
Did Gary really say that Gil was getting shirty with them?
- Thread starter
- #1,074
Yeah, three-quarters in jest but.
Garry tried to go in hard with a "story" about a Swans supporter, of South Melbourne stock I believe, suggesting online that Swans supporters throw eggs at the boo-sies. Gil said that he'd heard about it, but it was shut down by other Swans supporters. Garry tried to plow ahead by asking why Gil didn't come out and say if you throw an egg, you're banned for life.
Gil repeated himself and added that no eggs were thrown and that there was never any danger of eggs being thown.
I was on the original Swans fansite, RedandWhiteOnline, while this was all happening - egg throwing never, not for one wee moment, had a chance of getting up. After Gil's original answer I was thinking that this is lazy headline "journalism", Double R. A story was there but it wasn't the one you're ragdolling around the scrubby front yard.
The Real Story (Of KTigers' Tees) - link
The forum and KTigers get a mentch here : http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...ay-adelaide-crows-at-scg-20150801-gipeik.html
Last edited:
- Jun 5, 2014
- 1,393
- 3,195
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Wellington Phoenix, Blackcaps
Dontcha wish they'd spent more time discussing the yes/no questions with him earlier and less time going Spanish Inquisition on him for the nuances of how he responded to the Goodes circus?
