Beautifully put in both your posts, Ghost. Tall Poppy Syndrome is a chronically over-used term to explain the sometimes negative perceptions of a successful sportsman/sporting team in this country. And it 99 cases out of 100, the term is incorrectly used to offer a simplistic argument to justify the rah-rah-rah cheerleader mentality of the tabloids.GhostofJimJess said:Yeah, the likes of Don Bradman, Richie Benaud, Walter Lindrum, Dawn Fraser, Jack Brabham, Peter Brock, Ron Barassi, Lionel Rose and Hubert Opperman must have tired of all of that disdain piled on them after their "fleeting" successes!
Basically, your argument is questionable on many levels. The likes of Hewitt and Warne are not scorned because they are successful - they are ridiculed because they are flawed individuals who at times behave in ways that give ordinary people the sh*ts. The same people who had problems with these two sportsmen before they were successful are probably the same people who still have problems with their antics. Their success on the world stage is irrelevant.
And Pat Rafter certainly didn't disappear because he was successful. He voluntarily retired due to his tiredness with the whole tennis circuit. He retired, and remains for the most part, a much admired sportsman.
Greg Norman, again, is still very popular. The fact that he hasn't actually lived as an Australian in Australia for the better part of two decades might contribute to some not cheering him on like they would a local hero. I still think everybody acknowledges his remarkable contribution to Australian and world golf in his career.
So how about you overcome this persecution complex of yours about Australian sporting stars, and at least give people the credit that very often they make judgements of who they choose to idolise based upon factors other than simply what colour they wear ... or what colour they are.
For example, Hewitt is not disliked because he is successful. He is disliked because he is an a-hole. Not everyone thinks he is an a-hole, but those that like him should understand that those of us that can't stand him do not begrudge him his success or his millions: we just think he is a first-class a-hole. Ditto Brett Lee. We don't care if he is a multi-millionaire with sposorship deals coming out of his arse. We just don't like his chainsaw, or his gay little leap in the air, and we especially don't like the 5 runs an over he coughs up in test cricket more often than not. We don't begrudge Warney and his millions either. In fact, we admire the sheer brilliance of what he can do with a cricket ball. But some of us are not so naive that we believe that he took a steroid masking agent to make himself look thin, especially at a time when it took him 3 short weeks to recover from a dislocated shoulder in his bowling arm 2 months before the World Cup. We also don't believe that taking cash from an Indian bookie for "pitch and weather information" cuts the mustard. More than happy for him to have 10 Ferraris in the garage and get paid half a mill to quit smoking (even though he didn't). Doesn't mean we have to like him.
It is not because of Tall Poppy Syndrome that these sportspeople are disliked. Despite evidence to the contrary, most humans can actually process decisions rationally in their brain. These 3 examples offer plenty of reasons to be disliked, and similarly they also offer plenty of reasons to be liked and admired. The choice is ours quite simply.