Right, so the review process is correct because you feel in your extremely biased opinion that it was correct? Okay gotcha.
You are asking for some sort of evidence to back up these claims. Have you somehow missed the table that prompted the posting of this thread?
Very strong statistical evidence to be found there.
it's more that i'm not a conspiracy theorist, but sure.
As I've already explained in great detail, simply adding up differentials is not "strong statistical evidence". I have even analysed it against ladder position to find an absolute lack of effect size. Unfortunately, most AFL fans don't understand what constitute statistical analysis, or would just rather pretend that a spreadsheet counts.