The AFL season fixture is inherently unbalanced. Some teams face each other twice, while others meet only once. In a competitive season like the one we've just seen, this imbalance can significantly impact a team's final position. For instance, playing a weaker team twice instead of a stronger one could be the difference between securing a top 4 spot or missing the finals altogether.
To address this imbalance, I've created an alternative ladder using the following method:
While this approach doesn't account for home/away advantages, I believe it offers a fairer representation of team performance compared to the standard ladder.
This method aims to minimise the impact of fixture inequality and provide a more balanced view of each team's season performance.
To address this imbalance, I've created an alternative ladder using the following method:
- For teams that played each other twice (duplicate matchups), I combined their scores from both games.
- The team with the higher cumulative score in these combined matchups was awarded the four points.
- For single matchups (teams that only played each other once), points were assigned as normal.
While this approach doesn't account for home/away advantages, I believe it offers a fairer representation of team performance compared to the standard ladder.
This method aims to minimise the impact of fixture inequality and provide a more balanced view of each team's season performance.