Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will bring a new meaning to the term.From Brisbane times
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/na...with-a-hint-of-pineapple-20241121-p5ksh9.html
Or the web archive version https://archive.md/TBjvS
I "like" their suggestion for the Brisbane arena (where the gabba is currently)
View attachment 2177189
From the article / submission it would still involve a stadium at Vic Park. So I guess that would need to be built first unless they do the arena at the Gabba and Vic park at the same time (in which case we are stuffed).If they were building it for the Olympics it may mean that we can stay in the Gabba for a slightly longer period as it may not take quite as long to build as a new stadium on the site.
That may be why they also suggest it possibly not being built until after the Olympics and the swimming moving to the Gold Coast.From the article / submission it would still involve a stadium at Vic Park. So I guess that would need to be built first unless they do the arena at the Gabba and Vic park at the same time (in which case we are stuffed).
I don't think they realise that they will still need somewhere to play cricket in Brisbane during the games, given Vic Park would be for athletics.
I really like this part from the article as i have been an advocate for this to happen since the sad saga began.From Brisbane times
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/na...with-a-hint-of-pineapple-20241121-p5ksh9.html
Or the web archive version https://archive.md/TBjvS
I "like" their suggestion for the Brisbane arena (where the gabba is currently)
View attachment 2177189
Yes. Far too obvious and sensible for any government to ever take seriously, sadly.Sarcasm aside, the idea of either repurposing/refurbishing/modernising the existing Gabba stadium or replacing it with a smaller one for the Brisbane Arena makes THE most sense of any proposal and I can't understand why it wasn't considered from day 1.
The transport infrastructure is utilised, the foot print could be reduced, the school is saved, the specific sporting requirements are taken away...
And it frees up the "capital" both politically and financially to build a new stadium that's fit for purpose.
It's bloody obvious really.
Wow, a sensible plan and a unique design for an arena. I like it!From Brisbane times
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/na...with-a-hint-of-pineapple-20241121-p5ksh9.html
Or the web archive version https://archive.md/TBjvS
I "like" their suggestion for the Brisbane arena (where the gabba is currently)
View attachment 2177189
I really like this part from the article as i have been an advocate for this to happen since the sad saga began.
With terms of reference yet to reveal the scope of the review, there is even talk of Brisbane Arena, earmarked to host the swimming, being put off until after 2032, and the Gold Coast instead providing the pool for the Games.
Reading the article if all were put in place where is the money coming from.
The government can't afford to have 2 new venues now.
What is proposed would be super expensive. Nothing really wrong with the ideas though.
I prefer Brisbane Arena cancelled but over Wooloongabba station if feasible before the Gabba site.
He is kidding if he thinks a new stadium will be built first, so the Lions & cricket can move in before starting Brisbane Arena on The Gabba site. "[building it after the main stadium] makes so much sense "
It could make sense if it started June 2025 but that is extremely unlikely. It would be lucky if a validation report came back by that date.
His visual of Perry Park image below alone would be very expensive. I agree it is a better location than Ballymore.
Maybe a very reduced version but the same Olympic capacity of 10k as Ballymore
Perry Park is presently 5k. He has it increasing to 20k with a complete roof.
View attachment 2177244
.View attachment 2177257
You are forgetting the 2-year pulldown timeframe for the Gabba before anything can even start on the siteIf they were building it for the Olympics it may mean that we can stay in the Gabba for a slightly longer period as it may not take quite as long to build as a new stadium on the site.
Olympics may not be enough to bring rail and rapid buses all the way to Sunshine Coast
There are fears one of Queensland's biggest cities may end up without a train or fast bus network that can carry athletes and spectators to Olympic and Paralympic venues.www.abc.net.auWhat's next?
The newly elected Queensland government has vowed to lengthen the rail line and an update on the rapid bus project is due mid-2025.
Train must cross 'giant swamp'
The new LNP government has vowed to spend billions more to extend the rail link between Brisbane and Caloundra all the way to Maroochydore by 2032, a goal which is yet to receive federal support.
But Professor Burke said the new heavy rail line would need to cross "giant swamps" and required major tunnelling work.
"It's going to be really difficult for us to make 2032, and it's going to take billions, billions, and billions of dollars," he said.
View attachment 2176574
Crisafulli must have completely ignored this report (in opposition) if he thinks he will be able to do rail to Maroochydore by 2032.Interesting optics. If the gov say rail is the legacy from the olympics and it doesn't get built by 32 gotta think there will be blow back.
And has now passed Parliament just then.Legislation for the 100 Day review will be introduced to Parliament tomorrow
Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games Arrangements and Other Legislation Amendment Bill carries on the voices for all remaining stages.
I think that site is slightly larger than the current Gabba site, which would likely make it easier to work with.LNP sources revealed a new stadium would be considered above the Cross River Rail station being built opposite the Gabba.
The current stadium could be retained to avoid displacing AFL and cricket, and be used as a warm-up track for the Games in 2032 before being demolished for an education and housing precinct.
This has been discussed many times by many people. The response I've usually heard is that it's not possible because of security risks, plus it doesn't allow parking underneath the stadium. If the Courier Mail is running with this, then maybe the security concerns were overstated.Interesting new possibility raised in tomorrow's Courier Mail:
I think that site is slightly larger than the current Gabba site, which would likely make it easier to work with.
It's also already set up for construction as the Cross River Rail site, and wouldn't require a school to be torn down.
If it's feasible, building on top of the new station might actually be a perfect solution.
Interesting new possibility raised in tomorrow's Courier Mail:
I think that site is slightly larger than the current Gabba site, which would likely make it easier to work with.
It's also already set up for construction as the Cross River Rail site, and wouldn't require a school to be torn down.
If it's feasible, building on top of the new station might actually be a perfect solution.
Fascinating concept... In Sydney they spent a few years (on and off) talking about building a stadium directly above Central train station.This has been discussed many times by many people. The response I've usually heard is that it's not possible because of security risks, plus it doesn't allow parking underneath the stadium. If the Courier Mail is running with this, then maybe the security concerns were overstated.
Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner has been corralling business leaders to lobby for an open terms of reference that would allow consideration of a new stadium.
Stakeholders, including the powerful Brisbane organising committee, have previously hinted at the benefits of constructing a new stadium for athletics that would deliver a strong legacy for the Brisbane Lions AFL team and Queensland Cricket.
I thought that site would have more building restriction than the existing Gabba site, same width between the 2 streets, so no gain there and would need some decent suspension over the CRR.Interesting new possibility raised in tomorrow's Courier Mail:
I think that site is slightly larger than the current Gabba site, which would likely make it easier to work with.
It's also already set up for construction as the Cross River Rail site, and wouldn't require a school to be torn down.
If it's feasible, building on top of the new station might actually be a perfect solution.
Review chaired by a property developer with lots of other property/infrastructure type people on the board
Smells like Victoria Park
Premier David Crisafulli has revealed the list of directors who will conduct the 100-day Olympic Games review.
The Advisory board for the review into Olympic infrastructure will be chaired by Chaired by commercial property guru Stephen Conry AM.
Mr Conry will be joined by co-chair of the athletics and cross country Jill Davies, developer Laurence Lancini, Transurban’s Sue Johnson, entertainment entrepreneur Tony Cochrane, Property Council chief executive Jess Caire and prominent regional hospitality and tourism business owner Jamie Fitzpatrick.
...
A major election commitment from the LNP, the review will recommend which stadium project will be used as the main stage for Brisbane 2032.
Mr Crisafulli has previously asserted that the government would not build a new stadium, nor would it pursue the former Labor government’s $1.2bn QSAC upgrade.
The board will be given 100 days to assess all infrastructure projects before handing a report to the government by March 12.