Art Vandelay_
TheBrownDog
- Oct 28, 2012
- 108,147
- 150,166
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers - Tottenham
Nothing gets past you SJ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and as expected now we have the 1937 Premiership.
http://www.geelongcats.com.au/video/2015-09-28/magic-moment-1937-premiership
Also any guesses as to the funny quirk with the 1916 VFL season. Quite a rare feat.
Melbourne clubs still moan about having to travel to Geelong for games Seems like nothing has changed!The AFL Record Season Guide (official statistical history of the AFL) has taken to placing Richmond last in 1916 to remove the apparent anomaly of Fitzroy being both the Premier and the so-called 'wooden-spooner' (a position with no actual official status). The convention is that the team that finishes last of the ladder after the first round of matches ('home and away' or 'home and home' as they were called in 1916) is the recipient of the 'wooden spoon'*. However, in 1916 with only 4 teams competing, the season results after the finals put Fitzroy on 5 wins and a draw ahead of Richmond with just 5 wins for the season.
The 1916 season nearly didn't go ahead as a majority of the clubs believed that it was not 'patriotic' to continue the competition while the Empire was at war** (the concept of 'Australia' was not very developed at the time and most people saw their primary allegiance to the King and the British Empire). Some of the clubs also believed that the rising toll of lives in the war would mean that they would have more difficulty in fielding a team as more players enlisted.
The four clubs that wanted to continue (Carlton, Collingwood, Fitzroy and Richmond) threatened to form a breakaway competition if the League would not agree to them playing under the auspices of the League. A compromise was reached for a limited season of 12 rounds with gate-takings going to 'patriotic' (war) funds with the premiership decided by a finals series with all 4 teams competing.
There was also some feeling in the community that working class and particularly Irish Catholic connections influenced the clubs that kept playing. Only weeks before the start of the 1916 football season, republicans in Ireland had staged a rebellion against British rule and oppression. The rebellion was brutally put down with troops from Australia among those used by the British.
Fitzroy had played in the 1915 finals and started the season with a win over reigning premiers Carlton, but after another win and a draw, lost its nine remaining matches before the finals. Carlton was easily the best-performed team of the first round of matches and finished on top of the ladder three and half games clear of Collingwood.
Under the finals system of the time only the team on top of the ladder had a double chance and to win the flag, you had to beat them. In its first final Fitzroy reversed an 18-point loss to Collingwood in last round of the season to a 6-point win, while Carlton struggled to overcome Richmond by 3 points. Fitzroy now had to defeat Carlton in consecutive matches to win the premiership. As Carlton faded (they also had some injury worries), Fitzroy grew in confidence to win comfortably in the preliminary final by 23 points and in the grand final by 29 points. Fitzroy and Carlton each won three matches against each other during the season with Carlton in combined results scoring 25 more points - but Fitzroy won when it mattered. (There have been quite a few premiers with weaker season results against the runners-up than Fitzroy 1916.)
See: http://www.users.on.net/~rogersresu...rs_Runnersup_Season/Prem_RU_season_result.htm
* Has its origin as a 'booby prize' awarded by the students of Cambridge University to the man who achieved the lowest exam marks but still earned a third-class degree.
** This was Geelong’s primary reason for withdrawing but they came back in 1917 when it was feared that it they didn’t, they might not ever get back. (A number of the Melbourne clubs resented having to travel to Geelong for matches.)
If you click on it, those overtones get even eerierthejester your sig has eerily familiar overtones of J Nicholson in "A Few Good Men"
Seeing as it is GF week how about having a look at our 1931 GF highlights. Hope they show highlights of our other flags this week, good for a bit of a nostalgia.
http://www.geelongcats.com.au/video/2015-09-28/magic-moment-1931-premiership
"Counted"? "Counted" to what?Being this about History, can some one tell me why VFA premierships are not counted. The reason surely couldn't be because it would be unfair to teams that joined in the VFL, if this was the reason then surely they would scrub out all the VFL Premierships on the same grounds that it would be equally unfair on the clubs that joined when they called it the AFL. The VFA was a genuine competition with many G/Fs, that now mean nothing to the AFL. this is very disrespectful to all those players who are probably forgotten by many. I bet if you asked a younger Cats fan how many G/Fs the Cats have won they would answer 9, when the real answer is 16, which would by the way put the Cats 3rd on the list of most G/F wins. I believe Carter is fighting the Afl on this, hope he never stops reminding them.
It's similarly why it's laughable when Port in particular scream about their SANFL flags being included. Can't happen as there'd be years with 2 official premiers. No question we as a club should recognise them and I'd even like them displayed on the stands like our VFL/AFL ones are."Counted"? "Counted" to what?
They are (or should be) "counted" by all clubs that participated in the VFA at the time.
They should not be "counted" by a rival organisation (the VFL/AFL) as they have nothing to do with that competition.
I have posted about this a number of times before. It doesn't help that the AFL these days wears two hats simultaneously:
1. It runs the competition known as the Australian Football League. Under this umbrella, Challenge Cup premierships (1870-1876) and VFA premierships (1877-1896) should never be included as a part of VFL/AFL history.
2. It also now runs the sport of Australian football via the AFL Commission. Under this umbrella, it should be doing far more to acknowledge the history of Australian football everywhere outside the VFL/AFL est. 1897.
Note that the drivers of each of these responsibilities are actually conflicting, and that the AFL often picks and chooses when it wants to wear them.
But "included" in what? History?It's similarly why it's laughable when Port in particular scream about their SANFL flags being included. Can't happen as there'd be years with 2 official premiers. No question we as a club should recognise them and I'd even like them displayed on the stands like our VFL/AFL ones are.
Ok I'll rephrase I was meaning on the official VFL/AFL premierships list from which Carlton and Essendon have 16. It can't be included in that yet I have seen that argument being made.But "included" in what? History?
There were two official premiers.
1914 SANFL premiers: Port Adelaide
1914 VFL premiers: Carlton
We could keep going!
1914 VFA premiers: North Melbourne
Agree completely on the Premiership Stand. I have actually heard from the club that they are rectifying it.
TY for your imput M, very informative, I still tell my son that the GFC have won 16 G/Fs"Counted"? "Counted" to what?
They are (or should be) "counted" by all clubs that participated in the VFA at the time.
They should not be "counted" by a rival organisation (the VFL/AFL) as they have nothing to do with that competition.
I have posted about this a number of times before. It doesn't help that the AFL these days wears two hats simultaneously:
1. It runs the competition known as the Australian Football League. Under this umbrella, Challenge Cup premierships (1870-1876) and VFA premierships (1877-1896) should never be included as a part of VFL/AFL history.
2. It also now runs the sport of Australian football via the AFL Commission. Under this umbrella, it should be doing far more to acknowledge the history of Australian football everywhere outside the VFL/AFL est. 1897.
Note that the drivers of each of these responsibilities are actually conflicting, and that the AFL often picks and chooses when it wants to wear them.
Send them my details mate... I'll fix those numbers upBut "included" in what? History?
There were two official premiers.
1914 SANFL premiers: Port Adelaide
1914 VFL premiers: Carlton
We could keep going!
1914 VFA premiers: North Melbourne
Agree completely on the Premiership Stand. I have actually heard from the club that they are rectifying it.
Although it is generally accepted that the 1896 Victorian Football Association premiership was the first decided by a final 'play-off' after Collingwood and Sth Melbourne ended the season on equal wins, in 1878 there was a similar situation.16 premierships. Not 16 grand finals.
Ok I'll rephrase I was meaning on the official VFL/AFL premierships list from which Carlton and Essendon have 16. It can't be included in that yet I have seen that argument being made.
Yeah, it's a combination of different traditions trying to fit into one history.
We look at 1897 as "year 0" probably because it's been reported that way forever. In a similar way, for a long time all finals 'records' were anchored from 1931 when the McIntyre final four came into effect*. If we're talking VFL/AFL as you say, it's fair enough. But each club's history is a different thing.
Geelong VFL premierships: 6
Geelong AFL premierships: 3
Geelong VFL/AFL premierships: 9
Geelong Football Club premierships: 16
(* The culmination of this amalgam of laziness and absence of research was the 1985 Grand final. The commentators were quite chuffed to see Brereton break the record for most goals in a Grand final, except of course his 8 goals was still short of Gordon Coventry's 9 goals in 1928. But that was before 1931, so, out of sight, out of history. It's a great thing that fans care enough now to actually research the history.)
Fire was the night of 30 May 1928. A search on Trove reveals that it was news all around Australia from the Cairns Post to the Sunday Times in Perth which included it in its 'World's News in Brief' section (they were only a few years away from voting in favour of seceding from the Australian Federation).With thanks to Boyle's Football Photos: