Geelong on the peds...only idiots think so.

[A Cut Above]

Jimmy Bartel has certainly never been the same since he went off the juice. Went from being a Brownlow superstar to an average plodder in the space of a few years. Woewodinesque, but at least Jimmy didn't thank Shane Charters in his acceptance speech.

 

[Josh_hawk]

7 kilo in 7 weeks

*

McStabby did 6 in 3

 

[Mad_Hatter]

Essendon were looked at extremely closely by the AFL and ASADA and given the all clear.

How'd that pan out once WADA got involved?

Except we weren't "looked at" by the AFL and ASADA and weren't "looked at" after the fact.
So yeah nah.

 

[Josh_hawk]

Jimmy Bartel has certainly never been the same since he went off the juice. Went from being a Brownlow superstar to an average plodder in the space of a few years. Woewodinesque, but at least Jimmy didn't thank Shane Charters in his acceptance speech.

His diving career became exceptional though

 

[Josh_hawk]

Except we weren't "looked at" by the AFL and ASADA and weren't "looked at" after the fact.
So yeah nah.

So who were you looked at by?

You said the cats were constantly looked at since 2007

 

[Mad_Hatter]

So who were you looked at by?

Deloritte.

 

[kaiserchief13]

Dank + Thompson at Essendon? You know the results
Dank + Thomspon at Geelong? You bet they were on it

 

[Bandwagon2010]

Jimmy bartel is a glorified WoeWoedin and there I have said it and its true. We should call him Shane Bartel. What an overrated flanker he is.

#SoBraveShaneBartel

 

[Josh_hawk]

Deloritte.

Deloitte?

 

[Art Vandelay_]

We got a battler here.

So glad school holidays will be over in a couple of weeks.

 

[Mad_Hatter]

Deloitte?

Whatever their name is.

 

[Josh_hawk]

Whatever their name is.

What have they got to do with anything?

They're Business Management Consultants

Why were they investigating and who were paying the bills?

And they govern what?

And if they found anything wrong is it their responsibility to tell anyone?

 

[Paul Kersey]

Imagine being on HGH all year ripping sides apart and then losing the GF.

 

[chefmeister]

They investigated well after the fact, so they were never going to find anything.

So not finding something means there must have been something to find?
LOL, great logic there.

and you still don't know what drugs they took.

So you don't know what drugs they took but you know they took some...

Jeez the logic is strong with this one.

Everyone at the time knew they were on something but noone could prove it.

Well you've only had almost a decade to build your case so I'm looking forward to you changing that real soon.

 

[Josh_hawk]

So not finding something means there must have been something to find?
LOL, great logic there.

So you don't know what drugs they took but you know they took some...

Jeez the logic is strong with this one.

Well you've only had almost a decade to build your case so I'm looking forward to you changing that real soon.

James Hird is that you?

 

[Lethality]

So not finding something means there must have been something to find?

No, genius, it means the refutation that they didn't find anything means less than nothing.

So you don't know what drugs they took but you know they took some...

Nobody knows what they took, just that Dank was heavily involved in all 3 cups. Unfortunately, given Dank's reputation, (as well as The Weapon's, and other parties) this means there is clear suspicion on what Geelong took during that period. You can't be confident of the validity of those cups anymore as a Geelong supporter, it just can't be done.

 

[chefmeister]

No, genius, it means the refutation that they didn't find anything means less than nothing.

So now, they didn't find anything but you think they should have.
LOL, this sways from warped logic to overactive imagination.

Nobody knows what they took, just that Dank was heavily involved in all 3 cups. Unfortunately, given Dank's reputation, (as well as The Weapon's, and other parties) this means there is clear suspicion on what Geelong took during that period. You can't be confident of the validity of those cups anymore as a Geelong supporter, it just can't be done.

Don't even know what they took - check.
Don't even know if they took something at all - check.

You're on a roll.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

No, genius, it means the refutation that they didn't find anything means less than nothing.



Nobody knows what they took, just that Dank was heavily involved in all 3 cups. Unfortunately, given Dank's reputation, (as well as The Weapon's, and other parties) this means there is clear suspicion on what Geelong took during that period. You can't be confident of the validity of those cups anymore as a Geelong supporter, it just can't be done.

Again more bullshit from you. Not surprising.

"Heavily involved", he never worked for the club and when Robinson recommended him he got a thanks but no thanks from Hocking.

 

[Lethality]

So now, they didn't find anything but you think they should have.
LOL, this sways from warped logic to overactive imagination.

Yes, but it's your warped logic and overactive imagination. You can't even follow a simple position.

Don't even know what they took - check.
Don't even know if they took something at all - check.

Dank involved - check
Robinson involved - check
Remarkably similar physical outcomes as at Essendon - check

Might as well have had Lance Armstrong at the club while all the players' aerobic capacity suddenly increased. Now of course this wouldn't necessarily mean that anything was wrong, but you can't suspend disbelief either.

 

[Lethality]

"Heavily involved", he never worked for the club and when Robinson recommended him he got a thanks but no thanks from Hocking.

That's even worse. Dank was heavily involved despite Hocking officially knocking him back. Very similar to the complete disconnect that was going on at Essendon.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

That's even worse. Dank was heavily involved despite Hocking officially knocking him back.

More bullshit.

 

[Lethality]

More bullshit.

You said Hocking knocked him back, not me. If Hocking knocked him back officially then why was he heavily involved?

 

[Art Vandelay_]

You said Hocking knocked him back, not me. If Hocking knocked him back officially then why was he heavily involved?

Because he wasn't involved with the club nuff nuff, wasn't giving us PED's. We've been investigated and found to be clean. Looked at by Deloitte. Nothing.

All we got was actovegin from a Dank associated company which is a legal substance. Nothing untoward has occurred. We opened our doors and they found nothing amiss.

 

[Lethality]

Because he wasn't involved with the club nuff nuff

Please stop dodging the question. I'll repeat, did Hocking knock back Dank or not? Your claim was that he did.

Now, why was Dank heavily involved with the club if he was officially knocked back? Why was he even dealing with Robinson?

All we got was actovegin

Not at all. That was what was received in the report that the Herald Sun released, but it by no means suggests that it was the only drug that Geelong ever received from Dank by official or unofficial means. It only relates to that receipt that the Herald Sun reported on.

It's a simple syllogism that you have failed at here.

 

[Josh_hawk]

Because he wasn't involved with the club nuff nuff, wasn't giving us PED's. We've been investigated and found to be clean. Looked at by Deloitte. Nothing.

All we got was actovegin from a Dank associated company which is a legal substance. Nothing untoward has occurred. We opened our doors and they found nothing amiss.

You sound like James Hirds article in the HUN today

Who was paying Deloittes bills?