boncer34
Formerly "Dos23"
No I mean Celtic and Rangers.You mean Glasgow Celtic and Glasgow Rangers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
No I mean Celtic and Rangers.You mean Glasgow Celtic and Glasgow Rangers?
I always thought they were both called Glasgow. A quick Google search indicates I was wrong. Good oneCeltic and Rangers?
Geelong haven’t dominated for years, and even now that dominance is questionable. They’re really nothing like the Warriors...As a Cats fan, don't you agree that the Cats dominance of the AFL is very much like the Warriors dominance of the NBA?
Hence, AFL equalisation policies have failed.
Yeah a lot of people do.I always thought they were both called Glasgow. A quick Google search indicates I was wrong. Good one
lol. I hang my head in shame.Yeah a lot of people do.
Sidenote did you just happily concede an error? That's not how Bigfooty works
As silly as the comparisons are a salary cap loses its effectiveness when top end talent earn so much. Top end talent are easily able to set themselves up for life over multiple seasons and can then play for less money than other clubs are willing to pay for the chance of success. The problem is the players are people, not for profit companies, and hence money isn't the only objective when deciding which contract to sign.
It's not really fair to force players to go to the highest bidder but maybe players should be valued independently rather than using a dollar figure. This does however open up another can of worms entirely.
JeanLucGoddard said based ON a city/town, not based IN a city/town. He is quite right. Hence my example of Juventus, which is based in Turin but not named after a city, town or even any location at all.
Both based in Glasgow. Both called Glasgow Celtic and Glasgow Rangers I think?Celtic and Rangers?
lol, keep readingBoth based in Glasgow. Both called Glasgow Celtic and Glasgow Rangers I think?
Arsenal though would be one? I mean even GWS Giants would be one.
Celtic and Rangers?
Both based in Glasgow. Both called Glasgow Celtic and Glasgow Rangers I think?
Arsenal though would be one? I mean even GWS Giants would be one.
Ok so you're gonna keep shifting the goal posts here I see. Cool, thanks for the chat.Arsenal named after Arsenal Woolwich, very clear part of London innit.
Both based in Glasgow. Both called Glasgow Celtic and Glasgow Rangers I think?
Arsenal though would be one? I mean even GWS Giants would be one.
Has it ever been in their official name?The famous Glasgow Rangers? Not officially in their "current" name, but they do refer to themselves as that.
Celtic more accurate.
I'm 100% certain 17 other clubs are trying to get Cameron's signature. For mine, its lazy journalism when they do this whole "Geelong are in the race for Cameron's signature". You can say that about every club, and even if he doesn't go there doesn't mean you were wrong.Upon hearing the news of Geelong trying to lure Jeremy Cameron, I can't help but be reminded of Kevin Durant leaving the Thunder to go to the Golden State Warriors.
Funny enough while Geelong remind me of the Warriors, my followed AFL club the Giants remind me of my followed NBA team the Thunder.
This coupled with Geelong's phenomenal domination of the AFL much like the Warriors domination of the NBA, you can't help but feel that AFL equalisation policies have failed.
Do you agree that the AFL equalisation policies have failed, and what policies can be brought in to try and stop 1 team dominating year in, year out?
Oh be quiet. We have a few father son champs coming through. Wait until they have been picked up for cheap before you start gloating.Upon hearing the news of Geelong trying to lure Jeremy Cameron, I can't help but be reminded of Kevin Durant leaving the Thunder to go to the Golden State Warriors.
Funny enough while Geelong remind me of the Warriors, my followed AFL club the Giants remind me of my followed NBA team the Thunder.
This coupled with Geelong's phenomenal domination of the AFL much like the Warriors domination of the NBA, you can't help but feel that AFL equalisation policies have failed.
Do you agree that the AFL equalisation policies have failed, and what policies can be brought in to try and stop 1 team dominating year in, year out?
North Queensland CowboysThank you, Geelong and Perth education system products doing what they do earlier on.
And yes, Juve are one of the other examples in a thin list.
Canterbury CrusadersNorth Queensland Cowboys
Queensland Reds
NSW Waratahs
Geelong haven’t dominated for years, and even now that dominance is questionable. They’re really nothing like the Warriors...
Oh be quiet. We have a few father son champs coming through. Wait until they have been picked up for cheap before you start gloating.
Geelong are nothing like the warriors. Your forgetting that basketball is a team of 5 on the court, so getting a player like Durant when they already had 3 all stars made the comp uncompetitive
Western BulldogsThank you, Geelong and Perth education system products doing what they do earlier on.
And yes, Juve are one of the other examples in a thin list.
Ok so you're gonna keep shifting the goal posts here I see. Cool, thanks for the chat.
Geelong’s winning record after 2011 is approximately 69%. Very good, but hardly a dominant force. It’s actually astonishing that you’d think that you could include a period from a decade ago where they actually did dominate to boost numbers for your argument and not get picked up on it.Geelong have dominated since 2007 with a winning percentage of 75% over that time.
Further proves my point regarding equalisation failing, given Geelong are set to dominate indefinitely.
Geelong got Dangerfield though.