KermitJagger
Professional Thread Derailer
- May 17, 2017
- 16,411
- 53,854
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Slobbo catastrophising?The Tackle: Umpiring needs ‘royal commission’ response
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Slobbo catastrophising?The Tackle: Umpiring needs ‘royal commission’ response
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Slobbo catastrophising?
I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
He might get some pushback from his Geelong supporting mate.Slobbo catastrophising?
I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
No current season stats available
I would say that they will lose their Tassie zone with the inclusion of the Devils in the competitionDo they get to keep Tassie too? Massive slap for the hawks that
Some nice trolling of the Eagles by Freo fans...
Northern Kangaroos sounds like an ok name.Sounds like the AFL are setting the groundwork to actively encourage North to relocate to the N.T. in some shape or form in the near future by giving them carte blanche to all Indigenous kids throughout the territory.
There should be one condition.
They must play 11 home games each year in the NT.
Sounds like the AFL are setting the groundwork to actively encourage North to relocate to the N.T. in some shape or form in the near future by giving them carte blanche to all Indigenous kids throughout the territory.
Far Far North Melbourne?Sounds like the AFL are setting the groundwork to actively encourage North to relocate to the N.T. in some shape or form in the near future by giving them carte blanche to all Indigenous kids throughout the territory.
If an opposition player is within 9m (goal square) of the goals then you can rush it with no penalty.It's been a while since I have posted anything, but I am astounded by the hee-haw around some of the decisions in the Essendon/Geelong game. Just watched AFL 360 (and here I am 14 hours behind) and to hear Brad Scott say that the AFL told him that the rushed behind ruling was an error left me flabbergasted. I thought watching it that it was clearly a free kick and it had been so since they changed the rule after our (carn'n the Hawks) 08 grannie. Some of those holding the ball decisions being debated, I thought with the new interpretation, were also correct decisions.
Certainly not worth the airtime or the debate (and yes sorry, I am contradicting myself by making this post).
100%It's been a while since I have posted anything, but I am astounded by the hee-haw around some of the decisions in the Essendon/Geelong game. Just watched AFL 360 (and here I am 14 hours behind) and to hear Brad Scott say that the AFL told him that the rushed behind ruling was an error left me flabbergasted. I thought watching it that it was clearly a free kick and it had been so since they changed the rule after our (carn'n the Hawks) 08 grannie. Some of those holding the ball decisions being debated, I thought with the new interpretation, were also correct decisions.
Certainly not worth the airtime or the debate (and yes sorry, I am contradicting myself by making this post).