Not unless the bid comes in top 5. Gettable today said they are likely to trade one or both early on draft night.
It sounded like once he gets thru to a certain point they would contemplate trading…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not unless the bid comes in top 5. Gettable today said they are likely to trade one or both early on draft night.
That's what I'm saying, I agree.The only way we get Reid is with 3+ first rounders unless we trade an A grade talent which we have very few if any of that would even entertain going to WCE.
Now in 2-3 years time that may be different as player like Humphries or Edwards could become A grade but if they did why would we push them out?
If you could tell me that it would guarantee us getting Gerreyn and Clarke, I'm all in.
That's what I'm saying, I agree.
Just noting the idea that people seem to think Edwards will play a part, or that we should draft and develop WA kids for the in preparation for the "inevitable" Reid trade.
It's a pointless idea. We'd need these kids to not just have talent, but look like genuine future stars for it to make any difference...and even if that did happen, we'd want to hang onto them in that case (like Humphries).
You either get a kid like Edwards who's got talent, but won't move the needle on a trade, or someone like Humphries who will help get a trade done, but you won't want to do it.
Even if we are Reids' destination, we're better off working something out with picks than making plans years in advance and prioritising WA talent.
The payoff just isn't worth it.
I like the look of Jobe Shanahan.
Not sure if we would be able to get a back into the draft early enough to snag him… could be borderline a chance if he is someone we are keen on.
Shanahan + Neale young key forwards.
SDK + COS young key backs.
Conway + Edwards young rucks.
We’d all of a sudden look reasonably set for key position players all over the ground if we could get Shanahan.
He's not really like Jezza, but more a traditional forward I reckon. I like his aerial capability tbh. Looks a bit classy. You wouldn't hesitate at around Pick 20 that's for sure.I like the look of Jobe Shanahan.
Not sure if we would be able to get a back into the draft early enough to snag him… could be borderline a chance if he is someone we are keen on.
Shanahan + Neale young key forwards.
SDK + COS young key backs.
Conway + Edwards young rucks.
We’d all of a sudden look reasonably set for key position players all over the ground if we could get Shanahan.
If we are to use our F1 to trade up what are our targets for a trade? My take is
Richmond (maybe our F1 plus 45 for 18),
Essendon (F1 for 28, 31 or 40) or
Brisbane (F1 for 27, 34).
Any of those have legs?
If we are to use our F1 to trade up what are our targets for a trade? My take is
Richmond (maybe our F1 plus 45 for 18),
Essendon (F1 for 28, 31 or 40) or
Brisbane (F1 for 27, 34).
Any of those have legs?
You either get a kid like Edwards who's got talent, but won't move the needle on a trade, or someone like Humphries who will help get a trade done, but you won't want to do it.
If we are to use our F1 to trade up what are our targets for a trade? My take is
Richmond (maybe our F1 plus 45 for 18),
Essendon (F1 for 28, 31 or 40) or
Brisbane (F1 for 27, 34).
Any of those have legs?
Is there any point in watching on Wednesday night?
I think there’s close to zero chance we trade up to the first round
Just went back and had a look at Nicholls… moves well and has a nice pair of hands…but I think Josh Walker was a better kick than him. The ball drop is a football version of Ipecac syrup ..Id think he would have to improve his kicking out of sight to make it as a a forward.. probably ends up as a intercepting backman..
Just went back and had a look at Nicholls… moves well and has a nice pair of hands…but I think Josh Walker was a better kick than him. The ball drop is a football version of Ipecac syrup ..Id think he would have to improve his kicking out of sight to make it as a a forward.. probably ends up as a intercepting backman..
I know mine will not be a common view but I think the ceiling on Humphries could be higher than Reid. Humphries could reach the level of Andrew McLeod. My concern with Reid is that he is going to spend the next 2 years developing amongst a poor list and may develop some poor football habits that could then take a couple of years to iron out when he goes to a side with a good list around him.I think most would to do that trade if it means Reid plays in the hoops.
We're talking about a generational talent versus future 250 gamers.
28 plus either 31 or 40Do you mean 28+31, or 28+40... for F1?
Unless we had a recruiter banging the drum for a certain prospect, we would be crazy to trade a future 1st for anything over pick18 . Future 1sts are like crack to recruiting teams. Mainly as it provides list mgmt teams with time and space, they can bomb a draft, then look ahead and highlight their ‘two 1sts next year’. I could see us using a future 2nd to get a pick in the early 30’s, other than that I predict a quiet draft, with some absolute Wells knuckle balls late or in rookie draft.If we are to use our F1 to trade up what are our targets for a trade? My take is
Richmond (maybe our F1 plus 45 for 18),
Essendon (F1 for 28, 31 or 40) or
Brisbane (F1 for 27, 34).
Any of those have legs?
Any interest in Tom Gross?
Extremely competitive, explosive speed, physical. Not the best disposal wise, but neither is danger.
Only 181cm, but likened to toby greene in the way he plays as a mid/fwd
Boards seem to have him sliding. Was 10-15 earlier in the year, but now looking more like 20-30.
Could give us another injection of speed at the stoppage if we were to trade up. Strong chance GWS or the doggies nab him with their late 1st/early 2nd
what makes people think that Reid wants to come to Geelong?
also would you trade
I would not take any of these.
- Humphries and Edwards and our future first for him? or possibly
- Holmes, Humphries and our future first
I'd be extremely surprised if we paid up for a ruck again this year with Edwards and Conway on the list. It feels like lazy reporting. They look at our list and see we need a ruck and don't check that we've already invested big time in developing rucks.