- Mar 11, 2019
- 17,198
- 28,248
- AFL Club
- Geelong
AgreedFeels like 2 bad deals for WC.
12 and 14 should maybe get 6-8
And Baker isn't worth anything under 20
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AgreedFeels like 2 bad deals for WC.
The Oliver stuff was good at the start, the punches at the MFC kept landing, pity it was the MFC throwing them. Other then that I'd give it a solid meh/10.Honestly this has been the biggest bullshit trade period ever, there has literally been nothing happening for a week, hardly any news either, its stupid
Not enough would need more for 3
Damn that's good for GC
To be fair it has been crickets for a week regarding most tradesCrickets today with Oliver, if any potential deal was to be done you’d think the wheels would be getting into motion today.
More likely Frankie EvansOnly if one of Collingwood or Port absolutely bottle next year.
Also ends Narkle’s AFL career
"Why not both gif"More likely Frankie Evans
You know what mate?It's hard to know what their salary actually is, as best as I can find, I believe Macrae is on around 600k for the remaining 3 years of his deal. It's high next year, but low the final 2 years, whilst Daniel is on around 650k for the remaining 2 years.
I agree that it's impractical having those sorts of salaries in the VFL, but unless we're filling the pinch of the salary cap there's no real reason to trade them out for anything other than overs (given they're contracted). Next year we've got a few coming out of contract so who knows.
In an ideal world the salary cap floor would be dropped to 80% at most preferably around 50% but the AFLPA will never let that happen.You know what mate?
I've this forever.
The (then VFL) brought in a minimum salary cap so that they could boot Fitzroy. I have little doubt about that.
But I'd really like the min and max player numbers adjusted.
Let's say you're north Melbourne. Let them have up to 55 players (or so) and being able to spread that salary cap.
Let them find out which players will fit.
Dont make them pay 1.2 mil to someone who isn't worth it. Hell, dont pay 600k to someone who isn't worth it. Just because you have to meet the minimum cap.
The draft depth would increase massively. We'd see 100 being drafted. We'd see a lot more trades too.
And it would give clubs like North a chance to sort the wheat from the chaff rather than needing to nail draft after draft to get anywhere.
Daniel shouldn't be on 650k.
David BrownRe Atkins can't be too many players that have played for both Crows and Power. Matthew Bode the OG. Anyone else?
You can actually run at 90%.In an ideal world the salary cap floor would be dropped to 80% at most preferably around 50% but the AFLPA will never let that happen.
Hell even dropping it to 90% would help a lot.
They're talking about the prospect of him being in the draft.See this is what i *ing hate about trade week, talking about shit that will not happen, Smith has nominated Geelong, why the * would he want to go to St Kilda, he isnt going to do that to help the dogs get a better pick
It's really not. They need him (or someone like him) even more than we do.The saints midfield is pretty good.. They need some KPP they won't draft Smith top 10 if thr ND scenario played out..
Imagine us, we let it get to that point and he ends up a Saint, and we have to watch Atkins, Bruhn, Bowes and Clark next year. We won't let it get to that point , I just don't know why all the posturing, unless there's still a chance we can land Oliver why are we waiting until the last minute to get it done?Imagine dog supporters if the saints did draft Smith with 8..It would be hilarious!