Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He had been convicted for theft... stole potatoes. While he didn't have priors, nor was ever convicted for sex crimes, it means only that he got away with them. His close associate that is absolutely linked to this case - attended the footy that day and was well aware of the movement of the two girls to the moment they disappeared - did have a child sex conviction and took part in hypnosis of children. Birds of a feather, you might sayDid Hart have any priors? For sex crimes or other?
I couldn't find anything.
He had been convicted for theft... stole potatoes. While he didn't have priors, nor was ever convicted for sex crimes, it means only that he got away with them. His close associate that is absolutely linked to this case - attended the footy that day and was well aware of the movement of the two girls to the moment they disappeared - did have a child sex conviction and took part in hypnosis of children. Birds of a feather, you might say
It was explained to me by Det Bob Sharpe, on more than occasion, that Hart's "activities" in and around Adelaide were well known. It was also suggested, and to a degree supported by police, that Hart's associates thought he was better off relocating to Yatina permanently to reduce the amount of explaining they had to do for his actions. A bit more, out of sight, out of mind.Was it the 'association' that led the cops to questioning Hart over the girls abduction or simply because of his connection to the house so close to Kirste? They were into him too fast iirc for it to be the artists image that pointed them his way.
could this have been done by phone? an internal phone line, perhaps? les ratcliffe spoke to ken wohling, who said "they're not here" at which both men realised what had happened, could it have been wohling who went the office and got the announcement made?Why were the Ratcliffes told to find a police officer outside of the secretary/announcer's box to report the girls missing when the most senior officer on site, the "match day control officer" was in that office throughout the whole time?
Who was the man that was, eventually, successful in getting an announcement made - far far too late - by going to the secretary's office... it was not Les Ratcliffe, who had neither his friend Frank out looking for the kids and had not been able to raise police interest in searching for them.
You are correct on both points but I'm aware that I wouldn't have written "final" as I know it not to have been a final. A sub-editor possibly, and picking it up from other misinformed articles.The article says 'routine' movements, I was under the impression that this was the first time KG had been to the footy and sat with the Ratcliffe's.
It also says a SANFL final, wasn't it a round 20 home and away game?
it wasnt a final, it was late in the minor round series, it was the first time kg had been to the football, and thus sat with the ratcliffes, kg's grandmother always sat with the ratcliffes whenever they were at games there, it was actually kg's second time at adelaide oval, her first time had been earlier that same year attending the military tattoo with her parents, who were involved in that sceneThe article says 'routine' movements, I was under the impression that this was the first time KG had been to the footy and sat with the Ratcliffe's.
It also says a SANFL final, wasn't it a round 20 home and away game?
You are correct on both points but I'm aware that I wouldn't have written "final" as I know it not to have been a final. A sub-editor possibly, and picking it up from other misinformed articles.
As for "routine", Joanne (the Ratcliffe's) definitely had a routine - Joanne was allowed to go to the toilet only at a certain time in each game etc - and both Rita Huckle and Frank Bone were well aware of this routine.... which Kirste followed in her first visit to the footy.
This detail has been explained to me by members of the Ratcliffe family themselves, on a number of occasions.
Ive been watching, as I’ve not had internet access for a couple of weeks, & I certainly appreciate the clarification and filling the gaps. Its been very eye opening indeed!Fair enough mate, I wasn't having a dig, just wanted to clear that up as like you said there has been a bit of misinformation over the years.
I think its fair to say you've had a bumpy start on here but i'd just like to say I appreciate your input.
SA Police presser, Mark Marshall gets a mention.
Questionable. After labelling MTM as a fantasist, disregarding the information provided to them by him regarding Yatina, missing children, location of evidence etc, it took a group of GJ’s and persistent following up with sapol by Suzie to have them search Yatina. Evidence gathered and handed to sapol also became ‘lost’. It was only from them handing in some evidence and Suzie’s pushing for a search did they attend and ‘scoured’ the area, which even then, it was said, they didnt search in the areas of interest.i dont think sapol are hiding anything
Jokers stepped in before connecting with Suzie. But you are right, they did move this forward.... so people may now understand why SAPOL ignore the very real evidence of the "private investigators". Cops don't want to be shown up by bikers.Wish Sapol were honest for once and tell the full story of how when and why they ACTUALLY ended up searching Yatina. P.S. A big shout out the the GJ’s who went and collected evidence BEFORE Sapol even thought about getting off their arses! Suzie Ratcliffe pushed and pushed for Sapol to act and they did nothing, until of course Jokers stepped in for Suzie! What are Sapol hiding - again..
SAPOL told me, when asked to confirm a yatina search in 2009, they had no interest. I showed them that video of their detectives there... they changed tuneQuestionable. After labelling MTM as a fantasist, disregarding the information provided to them by him regarding Yatina, missing children, location of evidence etc, it took a group of GJ’s and persistent following up with sapol by Suzie to have them search Yatina. Evidence gathered and handed to sapol also became ‘lost’. It was only from them handing in some evidence and Suzie’s pushing for a search did they attend and ‘scoured’ the area, which even then, it was said, they didnt search in the areas of interest.
Why would sapol lose valuable evidence, handed to them with a lawyer present, luckily enough, they were able to provide additions samples, which sapol labels inconclusive readings...
If you have ever heard of Yatina, the history and the victims stories, Im sure you would also suggest sapol are hiding the Yatala link.
It’s strange how sapol refers to mtm as a fantasist, yet he’s been able to draw maps and pin point relevant evidence, as discovered by suzies investigators, yet SAPOL disregard him.
There is a YouTube on the search by the GJ...you should have a look and then ask why sapol wouldnt be interested..
(I cant add the link)
Sorry, yes, they moved first and the YouTube they had up of their search of the area was mind blowing! A book with drug measurements to knock kids out, what appeared to be the very hat in question, of course the barrels, all information as provided by MTM - the fantasist! Sapol HAVE to label him a fantasist otherwise they need to investigate their own people and ask questions which have been avoided for years.Jokers stepped in before connecting with Suzie. But you are right, they did move this forward.... so people may now understand why SAPOL ignore the very real evidence of the "private investigators". Cops don't want to be shown up by bikers.
Sorry to disagree with you here, but Sapol NEVER showed an interest in Yatina, even with the evidence MTM gave them. It took the effort of the GJ’s to go there & as confirmed by Bogart above, Sapol would not allow themselves to be out done by the GJ’s. Sapol only attended Yatina because they were forced to & even then, they half heartedly searched & they didn’t even search in the locations of interest. Most of the evidence collected WAS HANDED TO THEM by the GJ’s. So how much interest did sapol have? Sapol suggested in 2016 the search was suspended for safety reasons & they would return and yet here we are 4 yrs later with......if you seriously believe or could possibly suggest that Sapol are not lacking in this search (one of many cases), please do research into WHAT Yatina actually is...its not a place...its a living hell for many survivors. There were high profiles involved, fly in fly out perps and lets also not forget the drug growing Hart kindly did for officers at the time to ensure his own protection. Did you notice the airstrip close by? Charlie20, have you researched this place and what it stood for? Are you aware of the dark history this place has and the elite perps involved?sapol are not hiding anything, they have paid some attention to yatina because of hart's alleged involvement, but they are not taking it further because they dont believe hart was the actual abductor, and i agree with them on that point