Unsolved Girls that went missing from Adelaide Oval 1973

[Kurve]

Of interest.
- Arthur Brown - The Beaumont Children

 

[Billy Brainless]

Who says they havent looked at it?

And if Feds raided the place why dont they have the hat?

Detective Megan Kelly said they hadn't looked at it.

Stan Hart was most likely wearing the hat, and as far from his drug crop as he could get when fed police raided it.

Keep up!

 

[Billy Brainless]

Who says they havent looked at it?

And if Feds raided the place why dont they have the hat?

Dt Kelly's boss, Det Tanya Mason said they hadn't looked at it, at least not enough, that they still have to look at it some more, then added they don't know who will look at it and when they'll look at it.
And Mason doesn't know what Kelly learned from her very little looking at it... which consisted (she revealed) only of her contacting Akubra hats .... who are not the makers of the hat.

Some really simple investigation work would help both cops and yourself, I reckon

 

[GreyCrow]

Dt Kelly's boss, Det Tanya Mason said they hadn't looked at it, at least not enough, that they still have to look at it some more, then added they don't know who will look at it and when they'll look at it.
And Mason doesn't know what Kelly learned from her very little looking at it... which consisted (she revealed) only of her contacting Akubra hats .... who are not the makers of the hat.

Some really simple investigation work would help both cops and yourself, I reckon

I see you're a McIntyre

 

[Macka_321]

For whatever reason major crime don’t want to solve this well any cold case for that matter when was the last cold case that was solved in South Australia?

 

[Macca180]

For whatever reason major crime don’t want to solve this well any cold case for that matter when was the last cold case that was solved in South Australia?

Louise Bell

 

[Billy Brainless]

I see you're a McIntyre

You are THAT thick and narrow minded, then??? Surely you have to somehow be linked to cops with an approach like that.

No. Not a McIntyre buddy

 

[johnymac1]

You are THAT thick and narrow minded, then??? Surely you have to somehow be linked to cops with an approach like that.

No. Not a McIntyre buddy

We have to keep our options open, not focus on one specific POI. Producing a hat, does not solve the case.

It could be an unknown offender as far as I'm concerned. Not yet detected by police.
Nothing wrong with being linked to the Cops!

The McIntyres have definitely taken crime fighting to a new level.

 

[Billy Brainless]

We have to keep our options open, not focus on one specific POI. Producing a hat, does not solve the case.

It could be an unknown offender as far as I'm concerned. Not yet detected by police.
Nothing wrong with being linked to the Cops!

The McIntyres have definitely taken crime fighting to a new level.

Who is "we"?

Police have very little interest in this case... their actions have shown so.

Maybe it is the case they just don't think they can solve it... but there's also plenty of smoke hovering around sapol cops of the era to give them reason not to go digging now.

There were corrupt cops within the force then. Hopefully not now... but even good cops will protect the reputation of the force at all costs. More to the point, there were corrupt, powerful politicians then... who could, and did, get rid of the only cops who would strive to control those powerful politicians.

And there were greedy people who traded in the commodities of drugs and children.

for the record, the McIntyres have had sweet f-all commentary on this case. Actually take a look at it and you will realise that.

 

[johnymac1]

Who is "we"?

Police have very little interest in this case... their actions have shown so.

Maybe it is the case they just don't think they can solve it... but there's also plenty of smoke hovering around sapol cops of the era to give them reason not to go digging now.

There were corrupt cops within the force then. Hopefully not now... but even good cops will protect the reputation of the force at all costs. More to the point, there were corrupt, powerful politicians then... who could, and did, get rid of the only cops who would strive to control those powerful politicians.

And there were greedy people who traded in the commodities of drugs and children.

for the record, the McIntyres have had sweet f-all commentary on this case. Actually take a look at it and you will realise that.

Can't Generalise like that.
There are plenty of good cops
I worked with a police officer on the BC case. He was doing his own private digging. Wasn't assigned to the BC case, but still wanted to see it solved.

 

[Billy Brainless]

Can't Generalise like that.
There are plenty of good cops
I worked with a police officer on the BC case. He was doing his own private digging. Wasn't assigned to the BC case, but still wanted to see it solved.

Makes sense that the guy who likes to control the narrative on a crime forum uses the term "we need to keep our options open" then has a rebuttal to defend the reputation of people he is clearly aligned with of "can't generalise like that".
Who are you speaking for when you use the word "we"?
You have a lot to say for other people who dont exist it seems Johny boy

 

[Macka_321]

Can't Generalise like that.
There are plenty of good cops
I worked with a police officer on the BC case. He was doing his own private digging. Wasn't assigned to the BC case, but still wanted to see it solved.

Out of interest what did he come up with?