- Banned
- #26
I think we're all missing the point .
Why hasn't Carlton got a mascot ?
Why hasn't Carlton got a mascot ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you kidding? I was talking about marketing an AFL club in a place like the Gold Coast.
How did this become about the Melbourne Storm?
so the cycle of failure seen by the AFL in the northern states is destined to continue.
Initially I sided with you on this; being negative, thinking that they've shot themselves in the foot, but they've taken a gamble, made some I think good decisions (colours and no nickname decision when there was never an overwhelming name candidate [if Marlins was 91% on the GC Bulletin, why was it only 55% on the GC17 site?]) and I think that come 2011, the GCFC will be well placed to suceed in their first AFL season.
Admittedly, the Bulletin may not have been one supporter/one vote, but the GC17 site definitely was. Even at 55%, the GC17 bid team lacked the balls, as does Gary Clifford, to opt for the clear majority winner of Marlins. Apparently Vlad didn't approve.
As for our right to criticise heavily, please visit the GC17 site. Look under 'Ambassadors' and you will find that Roger Merrett (former BBears player and captain on GC) clearly is alarmed at the lack of nickname and choice of mascot.
If Titans were named after a 28% winning vote, then how the hell did Marlins miss out with 55% ????????????
As for the colours, no matter which way they go with their combinations or proportions, the GC colours will clash with another team or even their away strip. The predominant light blue (of GC Titans and Blaze) will clash with Kangaroos and Bulldogs. Red and gold clashes with Crows.
Marketing and merchandising are very important to any club. The Sept 4 announcement gave nought to either concept. We all knew the official name would be GCFC , the same as Freo is FFC, that wasn't a surprise.
A logo that looks mostly red and white is an invasion of Swans distinctive colours. Lastly , what is the point of conducting a GC17 poll survey and vote if its published findings are trashed by the same body? You guessed it, GC17 gets trashed. And quite deservedly so.
As for the colours, no matter which way they go with their combinations or proportions, the GC colours will clash with another team or even their away strip. The predominant light blue (of GC Titans and Blaze) will clash with Kangaroos and Bulldogs. Red and gold clashes with Crows.
I disagree . There is nothing stopping them having a plain gold jumper with the GC logo . No clashes .
Has anybody noticed Carlton has a pain blue jumper with a monogram
with no mascot and no imaginative nickname .They're bound to fail .
Well maybe they will one day have a nickname, but that Mascot is just one of the worst Mascots I have ever seen, ......
.....If it was me I would name the club Gold Coast Guards ......
Personally I would prefer Gold Coast Chargers or something...
The Gold Coast name and mascot have copped a caning here on BF. But they just might have actually got it right.
TO me, they will always be the Meter Maids. Hope the jumper is shiny gold...
Most intelligent comment I've seen for ages. Can you post any likely meter maid jerseys for us ????
My point about the GC colours and logo, is that no matter which way they go now re their jersey, they will clash with at least two other teams H and A jersey.
Its a conundrum which was completely avoidable, and will stand the test of time, as one of sporting Australia's worst marketing strategies.
As for the colours, no matter which way they go with their combinations or proportions, the GC colours will clash with another team or even their away strip.
Marketing and merchandising are very important to any club. The Sept 4 announcement gave nought to either concept.
A logo that looks mostly red and white is an invasion of Swans distinctive colours. Lastly , what is the point of conducting a GC17 poll survey and vote if its published findings are trashed by the same body? You guessed it, GC17 gets trashed. And quite deservedly so.
Exactly! All those who went to the trouble to post excellent non-clash colours & guernseys, marketable mascot names and entered polls have been given 'the bird' - big time. GC17 deserve all the flac they're getting.
Exactly! All those who went to the trouble to post excellent non-clash colours & guernseys, marketable mascot names and entered polls have been given 'the bird' - big time. GC17 deserve all the flac they're getting.
We are brothers (up) in arms, and cannot be the only BF posters miffed by this muffed opportunity. Speaking of muff, Carna your meter maid post is truly uplifting and inspiring. I can see now a gold top, blue shorts and red socks working a treat. Might look a bit like the Fitzroy strip though
By exclusively calling yourself the 'Gold Coast Football Club' you do two things. First, you claim ownership of the word 'football'. You present yourself in a way that makes you the footy team on the Coast.
Second, you're telling the locals that this club is all about you and your city. Whereas the NRL is about the Titans, the NBL is about the Blaze and soccer is about GC United, the AFL is all about the Gold Coast. It is the true Gold Coast team.
Im a gold coaster, and was very excited about the new club, but without a nickname or a decent logo im kind just off it now.
Exclusive??!! They are ALL called Gold Coast - what distinguishes them is there nickname - Titans, Breakers, Blaze, United
No - selling is about merchandise : kids wearing caps & T-shirts. No child is going to buy that ridiculous 'logo' with GC on it (for obvious reasons, 'GC' is all over the place up here) - they want a shark or a marlin. And let's be honest & practical, any young boy wearing a T-shirt with Gaylord the Lifeguard on it is cruisin' for a bruisin' (no, I'm not homophobic, but young boys are!!!).
The ridicule, embarrassment and 98% negative response shows they are not selling anything. They are not doing their job.
The Sharks was THE CLEAR early favourite - so GC17 said no! Then the Marlins had an approval rating of 91.1% in the GC Bulletin poll. These were standouts!!
So that means that kids hate the Tigers, Demons, Lions ... does it?
Yes, that's why he's looking at the ball as though he'd never touch such a gauche object and why his more popular name is Gaylord!
We are giving it (deserved) flak because we love the game and want our new local AFL to be less of an embarrassment.
Did you see Hutchie's live cross on the Footy Show? Being professional, he had the 'GC' logo (that looks red & white from any distance) in camera frame just over his right shoulder. However, as nobody their had the common sense to take advantage of this promotion to about 1 million viewers nation-wide, they allowed people in the backround to just stand in front of logo, completely blocking it from view. Amateurs!
I'm sorry to be so negative to your blog, but contructive criticism is badly require as is a decent Marketing Manager for GC17.
Bravo!!! Finally hear from someone that gets it! I'm not from Bay 13 and consider myself an average Gold Coaster. And I want a footy team that my family and I can get behind like I did as a child. Granted the whole merchanise thing can be bit naff but that what is so great about it. When I watch the Bombers play I wear the red and black scarf and hat and scream 'Go Bombers' with my tribe when normally I wear a suit to work. There is a real risk in being too clever about it. There is over a hundred years of tradition that shouldn't be ignored. For the sake of capturing a vast potential fan base, give us a name that we can talk about now and keep the momentum going. Sorry but GCFC sounds like a soccer team. And the huge anticlimax that happened on the footy show GC launch was embarrassing. Very GC is for the tourist campaign and they shouldn't get a free ride on the the back of our AFL bid.
To some it may not be a big deal and certainly, though frustrating, I will remain a supporter. The problem is that we are NRL country. We need to break onto to market Loud and Proud and capture the rugby fence sitters and imigrants and get them excited about what is ultimately the best game on the planet. We all know we will need them for membership numbers. There is no place for the white shoe brigade here. Please send us Sheedy, Barassi... even Matthews, to teach these guys that the fans are the heart of AFL.
Im a gold coaster, and was very excited about the new club, but without a nickname or a decent logo im kind just off it now. i just think it's an appauling decision,they have treated the gc community like idiots. why ask for everyones opinion if u have no intention of doing what the majority wants the logo just looks dull and boring, And why is a lifesaver mascot unique to the coast?? go to any coastal area in australia and they have lifesavers
This debate about having a respectable nickname and mascot in order to sell the club to the people on the Gold Coast will be laughable when they make their debut with all those high draft picks, uncontracted players and zone selections.
They will be an instant power, probably for the first 8 to 10 years and there is nothing more attractive and easier to sell than winning.
While the Titans, Blaze, United etc. will be battling it out with mid-table finishes (or worse) and all desperately trying to maintain their market share the Gold Coast Football Club will be winning flags and fans with relative ease.
You can call them anything you like, as long as they win people will support them, and if they become a dynasty, as looks like happening, then they will easily assume the mantle of the premier sporting club on the coast.