Autopsy Hahahahahahahah

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

...I'm not even joking when I say that is the greatest single ruck performance by a Hawthorn player I think I've ever seen. (Could just be riding up on cloud 9 right now :D)
Calm down a bit or there'll be a couple of big fellas at your front door in a bit. The one named Dear probably just wants you to watch a DVD of the '91 Grand Final, but the other one named Scott might be there to beat the living crap out of you with his purse simply because he disagrees with you about the 'bestiness" of Big Boy's excellent performance!
 
But what about the culture...:rolleyes:

Absolutely no doubt that they haven't delivered when it matters since 1933.

However 2005,2006,2012,2014,2016 is a pretty good record. Finals every year also. They have had a wonderful run for a relocated side.

We seem to have the mental edge over them. Similar to what geelong have been doing to us.


KOLOKOTRONIS
 
To be fair I agree with his criticisms of it and he admitted to seeing it from a biased point of view. I was just glad one went in our favour. Until this season I felt like every score review was unfavourable no matter which end of the ground it occurred. Of course, I'm looking at it from a brown and gold point of view.
Umpires call was that it was a goal.

Review didn't provide conclusive evidence that it should be over-turned.

What is it, exactly, that he wanted to happen?

I agree with you - I always feel like any 50/50 will go in our opponent's favour: 90/10.

I didn't see his feedback, but from the above, I assume that he wanted people to side with him & over-rule the judge that was less than 2m away, despite the technology not supporting his desired outcome.

I live in Perth. Pilot's call is that it takes me 3.5 hours to get to Melbourne. I'd really like technology to over-rule that & to make it a 2.5hr flight; &, from my coach's box (see: couch, with google), I can support my perspective. Would he agree?
 
For any lurking CoLA flogs that say their outs hurt them more than ours....


IMG_0002_zps0mf31orc.png
2 of the Sydney missing 4 are certified potatoes btw....
 
Who the f@$k does this commentary? The man on the mark was a metre or so OUTSIDE fifty. Silk kicked a BOMB to get us going
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7582.PNG
    IMG_7582.PNG
    61.2 KB · Views: 3
Calm down a bit or there'll be a couple of big fellas at your front door in a bit. The one named Dear probably just wants you to watch a DVD of the '91 Grand Final, but the other one named Scott might be there to beat the living crap out of you with his purse simply because he disagrees with you about the 'bestiness" of Big Boy's excellent performance!

I was on cloud nine over the win mate. My senses were overloaded with the sight of the strapping #7 crashing every pack and clunking them like he was Carey. I've settled down a bit :p Fair to say I've calmed down a bit but what a performance it was from the Big Boy. Would be comfortably 2nd in the B&F.

Never got to see Scott play myself but I'm guessing he played a hell of a lot better than he dresses ;)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Umpires call was that it was a goal.

Review didn't provide conclusive evidence that it should be over-turned.

What is it, exactly, that he wanted to happen?

I agree with you - I always feel like any 50/50 will go in our opponent's favour: 90/10.

I didn't see his feedback, but from the above, I assume that he wanted people to side with him & over-rule the judge that was less than 2m away, despite the technology not supporting his desired outcome.

I live in Perth. Pilot's call is that it takes me 3.5 hours to get to Melbourne. I'd really like technology to over-rule that & to make it a 2.5hr flight; &, from my coach's box (see: couch, with google), I can support my perspective. Would he agree?
He pretty much said if you're gonna have a score review the technology needs to be better. He's right. I'd be happy with no score review until this garbage frame rate is fixed.
 
He pretty much said if you're gonna have a score review the technology needs to be better. He's right. I'd be happy with no score review until this garbage frame rate is fixed.
Agreed.
Wouldn't have helped him in this situation as the Goal Ump ruled it a goal.

I'm sure it is (not) just biased memory, but I'm sure the majority of our reviews the last 3 years have gone against what the majority of us would have seen during review. I don't have stats, but I know that I've seen some goals changed to points, based on footage that should have supported us the other way.
 
Calm down a bit or there'll be a couple of big fellas at your front door in a bit. The one named Dear probably just wants you to watch a DVD of the '91 Grand Final, but the other one named Scott might be there to beat the living crap out of you with his purse simply because he disagrees with you about the 'bestiness" of Big Boy's excellent performance!
Scotty'll tell you it's a manbag! :D

Wonderful effort from BB. He is having some sort of season. What a difference fitness makes to a ruckman. His strong hands and judgement have been superb, especially in his work around the ground.

Oh, what a night! While these close finishes are not the way to a healthy heart, they are certainly fine for the soul when we win! They are also great for the continuing education and backbone growth of our youngsters. But, they are proving terrible for my face muscles - I can't get rid of this grin. I have been quoting this thread's title quite a bit, too!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy Hahahahahahahah

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top