Has Malthouse Been A Failure?

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

I don't understand in any sport why the blame is immediately put on coaches.

Whether you like Malthouse or not, we all know that he can coach and he has proven that many times.

Our team is full of inconsistent frontrunners, that's the problem. I actually think we have been playing much better footy under Malthouse, we just don't have the players to justify his coaching ability.
 
I don't understand in any sport why the blame is immediately put on coaches.

Whether you like Malthouse or not, we all know that he can coach and he has proven that many times.

Our team is full of inconsistent frontrunners, that's the problem. I actually think we have been playing much better footy under Malthouse, we just don't have the players to justify his coaching ability.


A major problem is the deficiencies in your list, which could of been addressed.

Was Mick even there early enough to help rectify this or still on his book tour?

For mine, it was fairly obvious you needed to be busy in trade week end of last year.
 
Agent Malthouse has completed his mission

Not quite, one more game against North in a fortnight to snag the Friday night quaddie.

Already got the extra double - Richmond on Thursday into St.Kilda on Monday.

Edit: Actually Carlton's already lost four Friday nights.
 
A major problem is the deficiencies in your list, which could of been addressed.

Was Mick even there early enough to help rectify this or still on his book tour?

For mine, it was fairly obvious you needed to be busy in trade week end of last year.



Carlton as a club over-rate that list. They think they have the wares when all they've is 1/3rd of a really good team. They have too high expectations and that is what led them to axe a much beloved son of the club.

Wake up to yourselves, you're shit.
 
doesn't have a plan for dane swann either allowed him to play 'loose man all over ground' tonight.

Funny that isn't it. Mick is playing so many players with defensive roles but can't send someone to Swan? The Pendlebury tag wasn't working, so switch it! Armfield, Cachia, Curnow and Robinson (at times) is to many negative players. What's worse is the tags aren't working!

To many players doing nothing tonight: Armfield, Cachia, Curnow, Robinson, Touhy, Betts, Garlett, Yarran and Casboult. Waite is inconsistent, Murphy is in horrible form and Judd can't carry them anymore. Not much depth either....
 
Funny that isn't it. Mick is playing so many players with defensive roles but can't send someone to Swan? The Pendlebury tag wasn't working, so switch it! Armfield, Cachia, Curnow and Robinson (at times) is to many negative players. What's worse is the tags aren't working!

To many players doing nothing tonight: Armfield, Cachia, Curnow, Robinson, Touhy, Betts, Garlett, Yarran and Casboult. Waite is inconsistent, Murphy is in horrible form and Judd can't carry them anymore. Not much depth either....
You forgot gibbs. What a joke of a number one draft pick
 
Looks to me like a clear case of the players not playing for their coach. Collingwood should of won by 70 points tonight, it was a genuine hiding.
 
Lyon also had a slow start at St Kilda and Fremantle...it's not unusual when you have to change the Ratten way.

Always have been happy to give MM one and half years to assess the list. We have too many of the same types and not enough of the others.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Eddie said he feared for Micks health at one stage, looked a bit like that tonight a couple of times as well.

Not a bad coach Mick, when he's doing it for the right reasons.
Eddie has zero credibility these days.
Carlton didn't shaft a club legend and pay over the odds for MM to miss the finals, he has been a failure.
Is it not obvious enough for you? Ratten and other Carlton football department members have damaged this club badly. Our recruiting has been terrible, development has been sketchy, the way in which they've been taught to a play as a team has been terrible, players haven't been accountable and so on.

Anyone that thinks you can fix recruiting, development, team play, being accountable and son on with the recruitment of one coach and in one season is being ridiculous.
 
Yes he has. Signed because power brokers thought they were close to a premiership. ...so so so far off. Carlton are crap. Overated by dumb people. ......
Footy changes quickly. Malthouse has two years left to make an impact.
Carlton as a club over-rate that list. They think they have the wares when all they've is 1/3rd of a really good team. They have too high expectations and that is what led them to axe a much beloved son of the club.

Wake up to yourselves, you're shit.
And Richmond don't?
Probably worth bumping each time they miss finals
They're probably going to miss the finals for the first time in his first year of his Carlton tenure. WHAT A FAILURE!
A major problem is the deficiencies in your list, which could of been addressed.

Was Mick even there early enough to help rectify this or still on his book tour?

For mine, it was fairly obvious you needed to be busy in trade week end of last year.
He kind of was. He couldn't do anything to the list though due to the AFL's ridiculous decision to add Judd's VISY deal to our salary cap.
 
Anyone that thinks you can fix recruiting, development, team play, being accountable and son on with the recruitment of one coach and in one season is being ridiculous.

Has Mick lost his mojo, though? Even the great coaches tend to lose it in their mid-50's. McHale coached well into his 67th year and reached 17 grand finals, but his last was at 56. Mick turns 60 next month.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top