News Hawthorn Racism Review - No player name speculation - opposition posters tread very carefully

Remove this Banner Ad

Wrong. Hawks did what they had to do by the rules of the AFL.
Correct. For reference below, once the HFC had the report outlining serious allegations they were duty bound by the AFL’s protocol to hand over the report to the AFL integrity unit.

I will pin this post, as it seems to be a constant query.

3FB2C172-49CC-4619-8AE6-C93597A89870.jpeg
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Jeff needs to understand that just because you qualify for life membership doesn't mean you are entitled to it.

Entitled is definitely the word.

The awarding of life membership has been delayed FFS, not denied.
Any normal person would recognize the delicate predicament the club is in - or at least keep their powder dry. But not Jeff.

Like every other autocratic bozo (yes, like Trump), Jeff shows a complete lack of sensitivity to the feelings of others, while being incredibly sensitive about anything relating to himself.

Enough years in the job to qualify for life membership, but not long enough to learn how to be presidential, evidently.
 

Log in to remove this ad.


I know its off season and the footy media is looking for headlines but this is such a non-story its ridiculous.

$1.5M allowance in a turnover of $55M should hardly be headlines. Its about 3.6%.
Who else but an AFL club makes headlines for a 3.6% adjustment to their bottom line?

They don't mention that with cash on hand of $70M, @5% interest per annum it will take the club a whole 5 months to earn it back.
 
There's a monumental flaw in your response that's bigger than the Empire State Building, and you conveniently seem blinded to it.

An incoming president who demands that each director of the HFC must make a pledge to resign from the board if the president requests them to resign (presumably because they disagreed with president Kennett)??

If that's not proof of a dictator mentality, can you explain what is ??!!

The reason why Kennett is still a live issue (and not something dead and buried as you'd like it to be) is precisely the reason why the current president and board have elected to defer his award as a life member. Perhaps there are issues relating to the racism controversy - that occurred under Kennett's presidency - that the current board are wanting to be resolved, before the club confers honours on Kennett.
You have the monumentally flawed position,or a giant deflection.
You claim, by assertion with no proof, Kennett was a dictator because other directors agree to resign if asked to. Oh dear how dare you Jeff.
But you cannot point to a single occasion occasion where Kennett acted on this so called pledge.
 
I know its off season and the footy media is looking for headlines but this is such a non-story its ridiculous.

$1.5M allowance in a turnover of $55M should hardly be headlines. Its about 3.6%.
Who else but an AFL club makes headlines for a 3.6% adjustment to their bottom line?

They don't mention that with cash on hand of $70M, @5% interest per annum it will take the club a whole 5 months to earn it back.

Oh so it’s like good news then? Phew! 😂
 
Still struggling with what we did wrong. That’s important as there must be lessons in this for us.

With Jeff - deserves a life membership and would like to see him let the current team have a go. Give him the membership.

Keen to get the review mess behind us though and support the current team. We’ve got a great lot of indigenous and non-indigenous players - and they seem a happy and developing bunch.

GO HAWKS!
 
You have the monumentally flawed position,or a giant deflection.
You claim, by assertion with no proof, Kennett was a dictator because other directors agree to resign if asked to. Oh dear how dare you Jeff.
But you cannot point to a single occasion occasion where Kennett acted on this so called pledge.
I'm sorry but the "If you don't agree with my position then you have to leave" is dictator type behaviour. As pointed out previously a good Board should be allowed to have some tension and disagreement to ensure the best outcomes are achieved.
 
I didn't miss your point(s)
And you just regurgitated them.

In summary
Kennett was a dictator.
I have nothing to prove he acted like one.
I and others don't like Kennett.

I just do not understand why you and others want to keep attacking people who have done so much for the club over such a long period
Some of your finest work there Jeff.
It's almost as good as the column you write in the Hun, which is right up there with that right wing Liberal loving Murdoch Flogger Bolt's work.
 
Gowers is tight with the AFL (a selling point for his election, after all) and the AFL’s first mode of operation is back room negotiations and the heavy use of carpets for hiding the dust.

Yet we continue to get bent over with the FIXture year after year.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

This has been pretty much left “off-Broadway”, but the rejection of the summary dismissal application made by 2 of the 3 coaching staff (Fagan is in the clear now) means the matter will continue because…. there’s a claim which deserves to be determined.
 
This has been pretty much left “off-Broadway”, but the rejection of the summary dismissal application made by 2 of the 3 coaching staff (Fagan is in the clear now) means the matter will continue because…. there’s a claim which deserves to be determined.
The application to dismiss was based on time passed since the alleged incidents occurred. That was dismissed (correctly I think as many abuse victims dont report things quickly), the finding doesn't mean anything in relation to the valdiidty of the claims.

Fagan isn't in the clear, his lawyers probably were just smarter and knew the application was pointless and looked a little desperate.

On SM-A125F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Apart from this application by Hawthorn, is anything actually happening in regard to this issue?
Seems to be absolutely zero interest from any form of media in the country.

Did Australia's embarrassing referendum result simply show the media we don't give a ****?
It seems to have emboldened racist political parties.
 
Apart from this application by Hawthorn, is anything actually happening in regard to this issue?
Seems to be absolutely zero interest from any form of media in the country.

Did Australia's embarrassing referendum result simply show the media we don't give a *?
It seems to have emboldened racist political parties.
This post started well, I have the same questions… I even gave a ”like”,… but it quickly became your political opinion and had no relevance to the review… and so the “like“ was removed.
 
Last edited:
Apart from this application by Hawthorn, is anything actually happening in regard to this issue?
Seems to be absolutely zero interest from any form of media in the country.

Did Australia's embarrassing referendum result simply show the media we don't give a *?
It seems to have emboldened racist political parties.
I believe it was more about the predictable corporate response from the AFL and our own short memories. It is ridiculous how long this matter has gone on.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

News Hawthorn Racism Review - No player name speculation - opposition posters tread very carefully

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top